BACKGROUND: To date, no study has presented results of photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) cystoscopy compared with white-light cystoscopy (WLC) in daily practice. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of hexylaminolevulinate hydrochloride (Hexvix(®)) PDD cystoscopy compared with standard WLC used in daily practice. METHODS: An observational, open-label, comparative, controlled (within patient), multicenter study was carried out on 96 consecutive patients with suspected or confirmed bladder cancer. All patients had standard WLC followed by blue-light cystoscopy (BLC). Positive lesions detected using WLC and BLC were recorded. Biopsies/resection of each positive lesion were taken after the bladder was inspected. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value with each method were calculated. RESULTS: Overall, 234 suspicious lesions were detected; 108 (46.2%) were histologically confirmed to be bladder tumors/carcinoma in situ (CIS). The sensitivity of BLC biopsies was significantly higher than for WLC technique (99.1 vs 76.8%; p < 0.00001). The relative sensitivity of BLC versus WLC was 1.289, showing superiority of BLC of 28.9%. The specificity of BLC biopsies was not significantly different compared with WLC (36.5 vs 30.2%). Positive predictive value for BLC- and WLC-guided biopsies was 54.9 and 50.9%, respectively. Negative predictive value per biopsy for BLC- and WLC-guided biopsies was 97.4 and 64.8%, respectively. BLC and WLC reached the correct diagnosis in 97.9 and 88.5% of patients, respectively. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.0265). The lack of a random biopsy protocol was the major limitation of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Hexvix(®) PDD cystoscopy used in daily practice enhances the diagnostic accuracy of standard cystoscopy with higher negative predictive value, potentially permitting an improvement in patient prognosis.
BACKGROUND: To date, no study has presented results of photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) cystoscopy compared with white-light cystoscopy (WLC) in daily practice. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of hexylaminolevulinate hydrochloride (Hexvix(®)) PDD cystoscopy compared with standard WLC used in daily practice. METHODS: An observational, open-label, comparative, controlled (within patient), multicenter study was carried out on 96 consecutive patients with suspected or confirmed bladder cancer. All patients had standard WLC followed by blue-light cystoscopy (BLC). Positive lesions detected using WLC and BLC were recorded. Biopsies/resection of each positive lesion were taken after the bladder was inspected. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value with each method were calculated. RESULTS: Overall, 234 suspicious lesions were detected; 108 (46.2%) were histologically confirmed to be bladder tumors/carcinoma in situ (CIS). The sensitivity of BLC biopsies was significantly higher than for WLC technique (99.1 vs 76.8%; p < 0.00001). The relative sensitivity of BLC versus WLC was 1.289, showing superiority of BLC of 28.9%. The specificity of BLC biopsies was not significantly different compared with WLC (36.5 vs 30.2%). Positive predictive value for BLC- and WLC-guided biopsies was 54.9 and 50.9%, respectively. Negative predictive value per biopsy for BLC- and WLC-guided biopsies was 97.4 and 64.8%, respectively. BLC and WLC reached the correct diagnosis in 97.9 and 88.5% of patients, respectively. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.0265). The lack of a random biopsy protocol was the major limitation of the study. CONCLUSIONS:Hexvix(®) PDD cystoscopy used in daily practice enhances the diagnostic accuracy of standard cystoscopy with higher negative predictive value, potentially permitting an improvement in patient prognosis.
Authors: D Zaak; M Kriegmair; H Stepp; H Stepp; R Baumgartner; R Oberneder; P Schneede; S Corvin; D Frimberger; R Knüchel; A Hofstetter Journal: Urology Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Marko Babjuk; Willem Oosterlinck; Richard Sylvester; Eero Kaasinen; Andreas Böhle; Juan Palou-Redorta; Morgan Rouprêt Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2011-03-22 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Ahmedin Jemal; Freddie Bray; Melissa M Center; Jacques Ferlay; Elizabeth Ward; David Forman Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2011-02-04 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Yves Fradet; H Barton Grossman; Leonard Gomella; Seth Lerner; Michael Cookson; David Albala; Michael J Droller Journal: J Urol Date: 2007-05-11 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Savino M Di Stasi; Francesco De Carlo; Vincenzo Pagliarulo; Francesco Masedu; Cristian Verri; Francesco Celestino; Claus Riedl Journal: Ther Adv Urol Date: 2015-12
Authors: Zachary Klaassen; Kathy Li; Wassim Kassouf; Peter C Black; Alice Dragomir; Girish S Kulkarni Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 1.862