Literature DB >> 22729595

Is endoscopic ultrasound needed as an add-on test for gallstone diseases without choledocholithiasis on multidetector computed tomography?

Byoung Wook Bang1, Ji Taek Hong, Young Chul Choi, Seok Jeong, Don Haeng Lee, Hyung Kil Kim, Shin Goo Park, Yong Sun Jeon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Choledocholithiasis commonly occurs in patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis. Although the recently developed multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) scan enhances the ability to diagnose choledocholithiasis, this technique is considered to have some limitations for evaluating the common bile duct (CBD). AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the necessity for performing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) as an add-on test to detect choledocholithiasis in patients who were diagnosed with gallstone disease without choledocholithiasis based on MDCT.
METHODS: Three hundred twenty patients with gallstone disease and no evidence of CBD stones according to MDCT underwent EUS between March 2006 and April 2011. If CBD stones were suspected based on the EUS results or clinical symptoms, a final diagnosis was obtained by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The patients' medical records were retrospectively analyzed based on clinical symptoms, biochemical findings, and results of the imaging studies.
RESULTS: CBD stones were not detected with MDCT in 41 (12.8 %) out of 320 patients with gallstone disease. The causes for these discrepancies could be attributed to small stone size (n = 19, 46.3 %), isodensity (n = 18, 43.9 %), impacted stones (n = 1, 2.4 %), and misdiagnosis (n = 3, 7.3 %). If EUS were used as a triage tool, unnecessary diagnostic ERCP and its complications could be avoided for 245 (76.6 %) patients.
CONCLUSIONS: MDCT may not be a primary technique for detecting CBD stones. EUS should be performed instead as an add-on test to evaluate the CBD for patients with gallstone-related disease. In particular, EUS should be routinely recommended for patients with abnormal liver enzyme levels, pancreatitis, and dilated CBD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22729595     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-012-2261-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  24 in total

1.  Accuracy of MDCT in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Stephan W Anderson; Brian C Lucey; Jose C Varghese; Jorge A Soto
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector-row computed tomography for common bile duct calculi: is it necessary to add non-contrast-enhanced images to contrast-enhanced images?

Authors:  Woo-Suk Chung; Mi-Suk Park; Sang-Wook Yoon; Jeong-Sik Yu; Ki Whang Kim
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Costs and utilization of intraoperative cholangiography.

Authors:  Edward H Livingston; Jordan A G Miller; Brian Coan; Robert V Rege
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-06-30       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Guidelines on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS).

Authors:  E J Williams; J Green; I Beckingham; R Parks; D Martin; M Lombard
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Predictive value and main determinants of abnormal features of intraoperative cholangiography during cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Shahram Yousefpour Azary; Heshmat Kalbasi; Ali Setayesh; Mirhadi Mousavi; Asad Hashemi; Mahsa Khodadoostan; Mohammad Reza Zali; Amir Houshang Mohammad Alizadeh
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int       Date:  2011-06

6.  Detection of choledocholithiasis: comparison of unenhanced helical CT and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  J D Neitlich; M Topazian; R C Smith; A Gupta; M I Burrell; A T Rosenfield
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Detection of common bile duct stones: comparison between endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiography, and helical-computed-tomographic cholangiography.

Authors:  Shintaro Kondo; Hiroyuki Isayama; Masaaki Akahane; Nobuo Toda; Naoki Sasahira; Yosuke Nakai; Natsuyo Yamamoto; Kenji Hirano; Yutaka Komatsu; Minoru Tada; Haruhiko Yoshida; Takao Kawabe; Kuni Ohtomo; Masao Omata
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  Selective cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  P A Grace; A Qureshi; P Burke; A Leahy; N Brindley; H Osborne; B Lane; P Broe; D Bouchier-Hayes
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Randomized clinical trial of routine on-table cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  O A Khan; S Balaji; G Branagan; D H Bennett; N Davies
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Predicting common bile duct lithiasis: determination and prospective validation of a model predicting low risk.

Authors:  R Houdart; T Perniceni; B Darne; M Salmeron; J F Simon
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  4 in total

1.  Detection of gallbladder stones by dual-energy spectral computed tomography imaging.

Authors:  An-Liang Chen; Ai-Lian Liu; Sheng Wang; Jing-Hong Liu; Ye Ju; Mei-Yu Sun; Yi-Jun Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  For biliary dilatation, a negative endosonography needs additional image studies in weight loss suggesting malignancy.

Authors:  Chien-Hua Chen; Chi-Chieh Yang; Yung-Hsiang Yeh
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  The role of intraductal ultrasonography in pancreatobiliary diseases.

Authors:  Bo Sun; Bing Hu
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.628

4.  Diagnostic Value of Endoscopic Ultrasonography in Symptomatic Patients with High and Intermediate Probabilities of Common Bile Duct Stones and a Negative Computed Tomography Scan.

Authors:  Tae Joo Jeon; Jae Hee Cho; Yeon Suk Kim; Si Young Song; Ji Young Park
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 4.519

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.