Literature DB >> 21669576

Predictive value and main determinants of abnormal features of intraoperative cholangiography during cholecystectomy.

Shahram Yousefpour Azary1, Heshmat Kalbasi, Ali Setayesh, Mirhadi Mousavi, Asad Hashemi, Mahsa Khodadoostan, Mohammad Reza Zali, Amir Houshang Mohammad Alizadeh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The major issue with intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) is whether its diagnostic accuracy for common bile duct (CBD) stones matches that of other diagnostic procedures, and thus, whether it will become a routine diagnostic procedure. The current study aimed to address the main determinants of CBD stone diagnosis in IOC among an Iranian population.
METHODS: In a retrospective review database-based study conducted in Taleghani Hospital in Tehran between 2006 and 2008, baseline data and perioperative information of 2060 patients (male to female ratio 542:1518, mean age 53.7 years) who were candidates for cholecystectomy and underwent concomitant IOC for confirming CBD stones were reviewed. The predictive power of this procedure for diagnosis of abnormal biliary ducts with the focus on biliary stones was determined.
RESULTS: Overall mortality and morbidity following cholecystectomy in the study population were 0.6% and 2.6%, respectively. Both early mortality and morbidity due to cholecystectomy were higher in male than female. The prevalence of CBD stones in IOC was 3.4% (5.2% in male and 2.8% in female, P=0.008). Among those without gallstones, 8.7% had CBD stones and only 3.1% had concomitant gallstones and CBD stones. The main predictors of stone appearance as an abnormal feature of IOC during cholecystectomy were: advanced age (OR=1.022, P=0.001), male gender (OR=1.498, P=0.050), history of abdominal surgery (OR=1.543, P=0.040) and preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (OR=5.400, P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: IOC is a safe and accurate method for the assessment of bile duct anatomy and stones. Therefore, the routine use of IOC within cholecystectomy seems reasonable and is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21669576     DOI: 10.1016/s1499-3872(11)60051-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int


  9 in total

1.  Is endoscopic ultrasound needed as an add-on test for gallstone diseases without choledocholithiasis on multidetector computed tomography?

Authors:  Byoung Wook Bang; Ji Taek Hong; Young Chul Choi; Seok Jeong; Don Haeng Lee; Hyung Kil Kim; Shin Goo Park; Yong Sun Jeon
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Real-time near-infrared (NIR) fluorescent cholangiography in single-site robotic cholecystectomy (SSRC): a single-institutional prospective study.

Authors:  Giuseppe Spinoglio; Fabio Priora; Paolo Pietro Bianchi; Francesco Saverio Lucido; Alessio Licciardello; Valeria Maglione; Federica Grosso; Raul Quarati; Ferruccio Ravazzoni; Luca Matteo Lenti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  ERCP and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a combined (one-step) procedure: a random comparison to the standard (two-step) procedure.

Authors:  Maris Jones; Matthew Johnson; Edward Samourjian; Karen Schlauch; Karen Slauch; Nathan Ozobia
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus intraoperative cholangiography for diagnosis of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Vanja Giljaca; Yemisi Takwoingi; David Higgie; Goran Poropat; Davor Štimac; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-26

Review 5.  Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Vanja Giljaca; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Yemisi Takwoingi; David Higgie; Goran Poropat; Davor Štimac; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-26

Review 6.  Ultrasound versus liver function tests for diagnosis of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Vanja Giljaca; Yemisi Takwoingi; David Higgie; Goran Poropat; Davor Štimac; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-26

7.  A scoring system for the prediction of choledocholithiasis: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Bilal O Al-Jiffry; Samah Khayat; Elfatih Abdeen; Tasadooq Hussain; Mohammed Yassin
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.526

8.  Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for secondary common bile duct stones compared with laparoscopic trans-cystic common bile duct exploration.

Authors:  Peixin Li; Zhongtao Zhang; Jianshe Li; Lan Jin; Wei Han; Jie Zhang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-06-04

9.  Combination of serum gamma-glutamyltransferase and alkaline phosphatase in predicting the diagnosis of asymptomatic choledocholithiasis secondary to cholecystolithiasis.

Authors:  Yong Mei; Li Chen; Peng-Fei Zeng; Ci-Jun Peng; Jun Wang; Wen-Ping Li; Chao Du; Kun Xiong; Kai Leng; Chun-Lin Feng; Ji-Hu Jia
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2019-01-26       Impact factor: 1.337

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.