Literature DB >> 22729059

A prospective study of endoscopist-blinded colonoscopy withdrawal times and polyp detection rates in a tertiary hospital.

Gary Lim1, Sharon K Viney, Bruce A Chapman, Frank A Frizelle, Richard B Gearry.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies have suggested that a colonoscopy withdrawal time of at least 6 minutes is associated with an increased adenoma detection rate in patients undergoing colorectal cancer screening. AIMS: We aimed to determine colonoscopy withdrawal time and rate of polyp detection in a blinded study--conducted at Christchurch Hospital (Christchurch, New Zealand)--to determine if there was a relationship.
METHODS: All 16 consultant endoscopists performing colonoscopy in a tertiary hospital had their withdrawal time from the caecum prospectively timed over 208 consecutive procedures between 11 April 2007 and 19 May 2007. The following data was collected: indication for procedure, final diagnosis, polypectomy rate, procedures performed and withdrawal time were recorded. Histology results were reviewed for all patients.
RESULTS: 111 (53%) of colonoscopies were performed for symptom assessment and 97 (47%) for surveillance. There was significant heterogeneity between colonoscopists' withdrawal times (p<0.001). Polyps were diagnosed in 65 of all colonoscopies (31.3%). Of the screening colonoscopies polyps were found in 38 (39.1%) of which 14 were adenomas (adenoma detection rate of 14%). The median colonoscopy withdrawal time was 3 minutes 16 seconds when no polyps were found (range 5 seconds to 11 minutes 50 seconds). The median colonoscopy time when polyps were found was 8 minutes 31 seconds which included time taken for procedures (range 2 minutes 7 seconds to 35 minutes 40 seconds), p<0.001. COCNLUSIONS: This study confirms that more adenomas were found by those endoscopists who had slower withdrawal times. Also colonoscopy withdrawal times are inherently much faster than recommended and highlights the importance of regular adenoma detection rate and withdrawal time auditing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22729059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Z Med J        ISSN: 0028-8446


  8 in total

1.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Philip S Schoenfeld; Jonathan Cohen; Irving M Pike; Douglas G Adler; M Brian Fennerty; John G Lieb; Walter G Park; Maged K Rizk; Mandeep S Sawhney; Nicholas J Shaheen; Sachin Wani; David S Weinberg
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  In response to: Singh S, "Colonoscopy withdrawal time and adenoma detection rates for trainees".

Authors:  M A Gromski; S H Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Individual polyp detection rate in routine daily endoscopy practice depends on case-mix.

Authors:  R J L F Loffeld; B Liberov; P E P Dekkers
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Evaluation of the combined effect of factors influencing bowel preparation and adenoma detection rates in patients undergoing colonoscopy.

Authors:  Hassan Tariq; Muhammad Umar Kamal; Binita Sapkota; Fady ElShikh; Usman Ali Pirzada; Nanda Pullela; Sara Azam; Aiyi Zhang; Ahmed Baiomi; Hafsa Abbas; Jasbir Makker; Bhavna Balar; Ariyo Ihimoyan; Myrta Daniel; Anil Dev
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-01-24

5.  Quality indicators for colorectal cancer screening for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Philip S Schoenfeld; Jonathan Cohen
Journal:  Tech Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-04

6.  Withdrawal time in excellent or very poor bowel preparation qualities.

Authors:  David Widjaja; Manoj Bhandari; Vivian Loveday-Laghi; Mariela Glandt; Bhavna Balar
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-05-16

7.  Predicting the risk of recurrent adenoma and incident colorectal cancer based on findings of the baseline colonoscopy.

Authors:  Kimberly J Fairley; Jinhong Li; Michael Komar; Nancy Steigerwalt; Porat Erlich
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 4.488

Review 8.  New endoscopes and add-on devices to improve colonoscopy performance.

Authors:  Paraskevas Gkolfakis; Georgios Tziatzios; George D Dimitriadis; Konstantinos Triantafyllou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.