Literature DB >> 22727285

Variations in image optical quality of the eye and the sampling limit of resolution of the cone mosaic with axial length in young adults.

Marco Lombardo1, Sebastiano Serrao, Pietro Ducoli, Giuseppe Lombardo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the variation in higher-order ocular wavefront aberrations and the Nyquist limit of resolution of the cone mosaic (N(c)) in a population of young healthy subjects and the relation to axial length (AL).
SETTING: Fondazione G.B. Bietti IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
DESIGN: Case series.
METHODS: An adaptive optics retinal camera prototype (rtx1) was used to image the cone mosaic. Cone density and N(c) were calculated at fixed eccentricity between 260 μm and 600 μm from the foveal center. Ocular higher-order wavefront aberrations were measured using the OPD Scan II device. The coefficient of variation (CoV) was used to analyze the variation in optical and retinal parameters. The correlation of optical and retinal parameters with AL was performed using Pearson analysis.
RESULTS: Twelve subjects (age 24 to 38 years; AL 22.61 to 26.63 mm) were evaluated. A high interindividual variation in the higher-order wavefront aberrations was found, ranging from 26% for corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) to 41% for intraocular HOAs. The CoV of cone density and N(c) were 16% and 5%, respectively. The decline in cone density and N(c) with AL was statistically significant at all retinal eccentricities (R(2) > 0.44, P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Although there appeared to be random variation in the eye's optical wavefront aberration from subject to subject, the cone-packing density and N(c) were highly correlated with AL. Although the eye's overall image optical quality in the emmetropic group and the myopic group was comparable, the spatial sampling of the cone mosaic decreased with increasing AL. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Copyright © 2012 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22727285     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.02.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  21 in total

1.  Assessment of Different Sampling Methods for Measuring and Representing Macular Cone Density Using Flood-Illuminated Adaptive Optics.

Authors:  Shu Feng; Michael J Gale; Jonathan D Fay; Ambar Faridi; Hope E Titus; Anupam K Garg; Keith V Michaels; Laura R Erker; Dawn Peters; Travis B Smith; Mark E Pennesi
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Influence of sampling window size and orientation on parafoveal cone packing density.

Authors:  Marco Lombardo; Sebastiano Serrao; Pietro Ducoli; Giuseppe Lombardo
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Registration of adaptive optics corrected retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) images.

Authors:  Gomathy Ramaswamy; Marco Lombardo; Nicholas Devaney
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Variations in the cone packing density with eccentricity in emmetropes.

Authors:  S Dabir; S Mangalesh; K A Kumar; M K Kummelil; A Sinha Roy; R Shetty
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  In vivo imaging of a cone mosaic in a patient with achromatopsia associated with a GNAT2 variant.

Authors:  Shinji Ueno; Ayami Nakanishi; Taro Kominami; Yasuki Ito; Takaaki Hayashi; Kazutoshi Yoshitake; Yuichi Kawamura; Kazushige Tsunoda; Takeshi Iwata; Hiroko Terasaki
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Wavefront error correction with adaptive optics in diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  Ali Kord Valeshabad; Justin Wanek; Patricia Grant; Jennifer I Lim; Felix Y Chau; Ruth Zelkha; Nicole Camardo; Mahnaz Shahidi
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 7.  Adaptive optics: principles and applications in ophthalmology.

Authors:  Engin Akyol; Ahmed M Hagag; Sobha Sivaprasad; Andrew J Lotery
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 8.  Adaptive optics technology for high-resolution retinal imaging.

Authors:  Marco Lombardo; Sebastiano Serrao; Nicholas Devaney; Mariacristina Parravano; Giuseppe Lombardo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Axial length and cone density as assessed with adaptive optics in myopia.

Authors:  Supriya Dabir; Shwetha Mangalesh; Jan S A G Schouten; Tos T J M Berendschot; Mathew Kummelil Kurian; Anupama Kiran Kumar; Naresh K Yadav; Rohit Shetty
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  Detailed Morphological Changes of Foveoschisis in Patient with X-Linked Retinoschisis Detected by SD-OCT and Adaptive Optics Fundus Camera.

Authors:  Keiichiro Akeo; Shuhei Kameya; Kiyoko Gocho; Daiki Kubota; Kunihiko Yamaki; Hiroshi Takahashi
Journal:  Case Rep Ophthalmol Med       Date:  2015-08-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.