INTRODUCTION: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) triggers a series of reactions resulting in cytoskeletal-related changes varying between focal and diffuse injuries. METHODS: The patients (n=38) were divided into group of diffuse axonal injuries (DAI, n=10) and focal (n=28) injuries. Serum hyperphosphorylated neurofilaments (NF-H) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) were measured by Biovendor immunoassay, and serum S-100B protein was measured by Cobas e411 (Roche) by immunoassay. Immunohistochemistry was performed with monoclonal antibodies (Chemicon, USA). RESULTS: The median serum S-100B concentration was higher in patients with focal mass lesions (1.72±0.4 μg/l vs. 0.37±0.1 μg/l, p<0,05) compared to patients with DAI during 10 days of hospitalisation. With respect to all patients, the highest peak of serum S-100B values (4.21±1.1 μg/l) and GFAP (8.58±2.4 μg/l) were found in expansive lesions. The median serum NF-H was higher in DAI compared to focal TBI (0.625±0.14 vs 0.139±0.02 ng/l, p<0.05) during all 10 days after admission. Further, immunohistochemical investigation, in deceased patients with DAI , using NF-H antibody proved positive varicose and waving axons, and retraction balls. Time-dependent profile of serum NF-H demonstrated the increase of values within 4th up to 10th day in both groups. Values ranged from 0.263 up to 1.325 ng/l in DAI, and from 0.103 up to 1.108 ng/l in focal injuries. Patients with expansive contusions had similar levels of serum NF-H as patients without expansive lesions. Immunohistochemistry of cytoskeletal proteins presented strong positive staining of vinculin, vimentin in vessels, GFAP, and S-100B in DAI compared to weak staining in expansive lesions. CONCLUSION: The time-profile kinetics of all markers may reflect different types of pathophysiological changes of the BBB or axonal damage in focal and diffuse injuries. KEYWORDS: brain contusions - diffuse axonal injury - S-100B protein - GFAP - hyperphosphorylated neurofilaments.
INTRODUCTION:Traumatic brain injury (TBI) triggers a series of reactions resulting in cytoskeletal-related changes varying between focal and diffuse injuries. METHODS: The patients (n=38) were divided into group of diffuse axonal injuries (DAI, n=10) and focal (n=28) injuries. Serum hyperphosphorylated neurofilaments (NF-H) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) were measured by Biovendor immunoassay, and serum S-100B protein was measured by Cobas e411 (Roche) by immunoassay. Immunohistochemistry was performed with monoclonal antibodies (Chemicon, USA). RESULTS: The median serum S-100B concentration was higher in patients with focal mass lesions (1.72±0.4 μg/l vs. 0.37±0.1 μg/l, p<0,05) compared to patients with DAI during 10 days of hospitalisation. With respect to all patients, the highest peak of serum S-100B values (4.21±1.1 μg/l) and GFAP (8.58±2.4 μg/l) were found in expansive lesions. The median serum NF-H was higher in DAI compared to focal TBI (0.625±0.14 vs 0.139±0.02 ng/l, p<0.05) during all 10 days after admission. Further, immunohistochemical investigation, in deceased patients with DAI , using NF-H antibody proved positive varicose and waving axons, and retraction balls. Time-dependent profile of serum NF-H demonstrated the increase of values within 4th up to 10th day in both groups. Values ranged from 0.263 up to 1.325 ng/l in DAI, and from 0.103 up to 1.108 ng/l in focal injuries. Patients with expansive contusions had similar levels of serum NF-H as patients without expansive lesions. Immunohistochemistry of cytoskeletal proteins presented strong positive staining of vinculin, vimentin in vessels, GFAP, and S-100B in DAI compared to weak staining in expansive lesions. CONCLUSION: The time-profile kinetics of all markers may reflect different types of pathophysiological changes of the BBB or axonal damage in focal and diffuse injuries. KEYWORDS: brain contusions - diffuse axonal injury - S-100B protein - GFAP - hyperphosphorylated neurofilaments.
Authors: Linda Papa; Salvatore Silvestri; Gretchen M Brophy; Philip Giordano; Jay L Falk; Carolina F Braga; Ciara N Tan; Neema J Ameli; Jason A Demery; Neha K Dixit; Matthew E Mendes; Ronald L Hayes; Kevin K W Wang; Claudia S Robertson Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2014-09-12 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Hanuma Kumar Karnati; Joseph H Garcia; David Tweedie; Robert E Becker; Dimitrios Kapogiannis; Nigel H Greig Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2018-10-25 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Linda Papa; Manoj K Mittal; Jose Ramirez; Michelle Ramia; Sara Kirby; Salvatore Silvestri; Philip Giordano; Kurt Weber; Carolina F Braga; Ciara N Tan; Neema J Ameli; Marco Lopez; Mark Zonfrillo Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2015-06-03 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Faiez Al Nimer; Eric Thelin; Harriet Nyström; Ann M Dring; Anders Svenningsson; Fredrik Piehl; David W Nelson; Bo-Michael Bellander Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-07-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Eric Peter Thelin; Frederick Adam Zeiler; Ari Ercole; Stefania Mondello; András Büki; Bo-Michael Bellander; Adel Helmy; David K Menon; David W Nelson Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2017-07-03 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Benjamin Ondruschka; Michael Bohnert; Simone Bohnert; Christoph Wirth; Werner Schmitz; Stefanie Trella; Camelia-Maria Monoranu Journal: Int J Legal Med Date: 2021-04-24 Impact factor: 2.686