BACKGROUND: Much recent research effort in traumatic brain injury (TBI) has been devoted to the discovery of a reliable biomarker correlating with severity of injury. Currently, no consensus has been reached regarding a representative marker for traumatic brain injury. In this study, we explored the potential of epithelial/endothelial tyrosine kinase (Etk) as a novel marker for TBI. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: TBI was induced in Sprague Dawley (SD) rats by controlled cortical impact. Brain tissue samples were analyzed by Western blot, Q-PCR, and immunofluorescence staining using various markers including glial fibrillary acidic protein, and epithelial/endothelial tyrosine kinase (Etk). Results show increased Etk expression with increased number and severity of impacts. Expression increased 2.36 to 7-fold relative to trauma severity. Significant upregulation of Etk appeared at 1 hour after injury. The expression level of Etk was inversely correlated with distance from injury site. Etk and trauma/inflammation related markers increased post-TBI, while other tyrosine kinases did not. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The observed correlation between Etk level and the number of impacts, the severity of impact, and the time course after impact, as well as its inverse correlation with distance away from injury site, support the potential of Etk as a possible indicator of trauma severity.
BACKGROUND: Much recent research effort in traumatic brain injury (TBI) has been devoted to the discovery of a reliable biomarker correlating with severity of injury. Currently, no consensus has been reached regarding a representative marker for traumatic brain injury. In this study, we explored the potential of epithelial/endothelial tyrosine kinase (Etk) as a novel marker for TBI. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: TBI was induced in Sprague Dawley (SD) rats by controlled cortical impact. Brain tissue samples were analyzed by Western blot, Q-PCR, and immunofluorescence staining using various markers including glial fibrillary acidic protein, and epithelial/endothelial tyrosine kinase (Etk). Results show increased Etk expression with increased number and severity of impacts. Expression increased 2.36 to 7-fold relative to trauma severity. Significant upregulation of Etk appeared at 1 hour after injury. The expression level of Etk was inversely correlated with distance from injury site. Etk and trauma/inflammation related markers increased post-TBI, while other tyrosine kinases did not. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The observed correlation between Etk level and the number of impacts, the severity of impact, and the time course after impact, as well as its inverse correlation with distance away from injury site, support the potential of Etk as a possible indicator of trauma severity.
The discovery of a reliable biomarker correlating with severity of injury has been the focus of much of the recent research effort in traumatic brain injury (TBI). An ideal biomarker would exhibit a rapid change signifying sensitivity to disease, tissue specificity, and diagnostic value for the disease. For TBI, the biomarker would have added value if it could also be used to predict neurological condition and serve as a surrogate endpoint for evaluation of treatment. Currently, no consensus has been reached regarding a representative marker for traumatic brain injury [1]. Previous studies show significant post-TBI increases of S-100, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), neurofilament polypeptides, and tau. However, while these markers demonstrate potential as indicators of TBI [2], [3], [4], the study results showed a lack of correlation of these markers with clinical trauma severity [5], [6], [7], [8] and suggested limitations in the discriminative powerof some of these biomarkers alone [9].
Etk is up-regulated after TBI. (A, B) Extracts of rat brains treated without impact (Normal), impacted once (impact1) or impacted twice (impact2) were subjected to real- time PCR analysis.
Expression of GAPDH mRNA was used as internal control. The relative Etk level of the impact1 rat was used as the fold increase compared to left brain of normal rat. L = left brain. R = right brain. (C) Western blots were done with antibodies to Etk and actin (loading control).Although the general pathophysiology of TBI is still unclear, recent research has revealed several possible mechanisms underlying TBI [1], [10]. While some studies suggest the disruption of the blood-brain barrier as a main cause of secondary injury [11], much of the literature focuses on mechanisms involving lipid peroxidation and the activation of calpain by the increase of intracellular calcium [12], [13], [14], [15]. Calpain is also known to activate Hsp70 and lysosomal release of cathepsin which results in axonal beading and diffuse axonal injury after TBI [16], [17].Many therapeutic targets involving the cascade triggered by lipid peroxidation are currently under investigation for use in the treatment of TBI. Therapeutic strategies suggested include the reduction of mitochondrial free radical production [14], [15], [18], [19] and the scavenging of peroxynitrite-derived free radicals with tempol and melatonin [18], [20], [21]. The use of estrogen, progesterone, telmisartan and wogonin has also been suggested to limit damage secondary to TBI [22], [23], [24], [25]. Calpain activates many injury pathways with its proteolytic activity on myelin basic protein [26]and mediation of collapsin mediator proteins−1, −2, and −4 [27], and has been suggested as a potential target for TBI treatment [13], [14], [15], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32].Many peptides produced by proteolytic reactions caused by calpain activation, such as alpha-spectrin derivatives, have been considered as markers for TBI [33]. The elevation of calpain-derived alpha-spectrin among other markers in cerebrospinal fluid was observed at 24 hours after TBI with peak levels not reached until 48–96 hours [34]. As early detection of TBI severity is desirable [34], we sought to find other factors which may underly the initiation of injury.
Correlation of Etk and S100 expression with severity of impact.
(A, B) Western blots revealing expression of Etk was upregulated nearly 2-fold in rats receiving controlled cortical impact at 2.5 M/s and was further increased to 2.7-fold when impact speed was increased to 5M/s. S100 was increased to more than 2.5 fold after impact at these speeds.A tyrosine kinase of interest is the tec kinase bone marrow tyrosine kinase gene in chromosome X (Bmx) which is also known as epithelial/endothelial tyrosine kinase (Etk) [35]. Most literature thus far regard Bmx/Etk as a modulator of apoptosis and cancer cell growth, and its cell-specific function has been characterized in various cancer cells [36]. Studies have also shown the Bmx/Etk-dependent pathway to be crucial in ischemic brain injury for the recruitment of inflammatory cells and angiogenesis at the site of injury [12], [37], [38]. Genetic profiling suggests that an increased expression of Bmx/Etk induces chronic inflammation and angiogenesis via cytokine-mediated recruitment of inflammatory cells [39]. In addition, Bmx/Etk was reported to regulate Toll-like receptor-induced IL-6 production, a cytokine closely related to traumatic brain injury [40], [41]. The possible role of Etk in post-traumatic neural injury and in the inflammation cascadeis the focus of this study.
Triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining of brain having received CCI.
(A) Figure indicating location of site of induced trauma. (B) Size of injured cortex was also increased proportionally to the speed of impact using triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining.Some studies have implicated GFAP, S-100b, cleaved tau, and IL-6 as potential trauma markers [42], [43], [44], [45]; however, other reports have documented their limitations in clinical use [9], [46], [47]. An ideal biomarker should respond rapidly to the onset of disease and be diagnostic of the condition. Furthermore, an ideal biomarker should possess tissue specificity and be useful as a surrogate endpoint to address therapeutic efficacy [34]. Since our initial experiments with genetic profiling showed a moderate increase in Etk expression levels of 1.8 to 2.5 fold in rats with induced TBI compared to naïve rats (data not shown), we sought to clarify the correlation between level of Etk expression and degree of cranial trauma. In this study, we demonstrated the potential of Etk as a neurotrauma biomarker based on its expression correlating with the location and the degree of traumatic brain injury.
Time course of changes in Etk and GFAP levels after controlled cortical impact.
(A) Western blot of Etk and GFAP expression at 1 hour, 3 hours, 6 hours, 4 days and 7 days after impact. (B) Densitometric analysis of Etk and GFAP western blot results revealing a significant increase at 3 hours after impact for Etk and at 4 days for GFAP. Values are expressed as mean±SD of three different experiments. *P<0.05 vs sham.
Methods
Western Blot
Brain tissue samples were lysed in RIPA buffer. 50–100 µg of cell lysates were resolved on 8% to 15% SDS/PAGE gel and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. Subsequently, blots were incubated with antibodies raised against the following proteins: anti-Bmx, anti-Stat3 (1∶1000, Transduction Laboratories), anti-Tec, anti-Btk, anti-Src, anti-FAK, anti- Bcl2, anti-LC3 (1∶1000, Cell Signaling) and Actin (1∶1000, Sigma). Donkey peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit or anti-mouse antibodies (1∶1000, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) were used and binding was revealed by chemiluminescence (1∶1000, ECL; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
Immunofluorescence of Etk and GFAP at the injury site after controlled cortical impact.
(A,B) Both Etk and GFAP was detectable near the injury site, and the intensity of the immunofluorescence signal for both proteins decreases as distance increases away from injury site. (C) Etk exhibits colocalization with neurofilament immunostaining.
RT-PCR and Q-PCR
Total RNA was extracted from brain tissue by utilizing Trizol reagent (Invitrogen). Prior to RT-PCR, 1 µg of RNA was initially treated with DNase I (Ambion Inc., Austin, TX) to degrade genomic DNA. Thereafter, 50 ng of treated RNA was used for each one-step RT-PCR reaction (QIAGEN OneStep RT-PCR Kit, Valencia, CA). Gene expression was quantified by QRT-PCR using SYBR Green dye. All QRT-PCR reactions were performed on a 7900 HT ABI platform (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) as previously described [48]. The sequences of primers were as follows: GAPDH forward 5′-GCACCGTCAAGGCTGAGAAC-3′ and reverse 5′-ATGGTGGTGAAGACGCCA-3′. GAPDH was used to normalize the expression levels in the quantitative analyses. The forward primer for mEtk was 5'-CACACCACCTCAAAGATTTCATGG-3' and the reverse primer was 5'-CATACTGCCCCTTCCACTTGC-3'.
Western blot analysis for other proteins at various times after impact.
Other tyrosine kinases (Tec, Btk, Src, FAK)and signal transduction proteins (Stat3, Bcl2, LC3 ) were analyzed after impact, Etk was uniquely upregulated after injury.
Controlled-Cortical Impact
Animals were sedated prior to impact and treated according to a Taipei Medical University Laboratory Animal protocol. Animal studies were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of National Defense Medical Center Laboratory Animal Center (NDMCLAC). Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (weight 280–300 g) were used for this study. The surgical procedures were modified from the Lin CM et al. (2009) method. Under chloral hydrate (40 mg/kg, intraperitoneal, i.p., injection, Kanto Chemical Co., Inc.) anesthetized, SD rats were placed in a stereotactic frame. A craniotomy of 5 mm diameter was performed at the right parietal cortex between bregma and lambda, and 1 mm lateral from the midline. TBI was made by a controlled cortical impact (CCI) device at a velocity of 2.5 or 5 m/sec with 1 mm depth. Body temperature was maintained at 37°C ±1°C with a heating pad. Rats were sacrificed at appropriate times for analysis, and assignments of groups were blinded to observers. For TTC staining, animals were killed at 24 hours after impact, the brains were removed and a series of 2-mm coronal slices were obtained and stained in 2% triphenyltetrazolium chloride (Sigma) in 0.9% saline, then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. The injury area, which was not stained, was measured using a digital scanner as previously described [49].
Immunofluorescence
Twenty-four hours after TBI, rats were perfused through the ascending aorta with 100 mL of cold normal saline followed by 100 mL of 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS. Brains were removed and post-fixed in the same fixative for 3 days followed by 30% sucrose for 1 week. Sections were cut at a thickness of 12 microns in a freezing microtome and stored at −20°C. For immunostaining, tissue sections were fixed with 4% PFA for 10 minutes. After several washes in PBS, the sections were incubated with blocking buffer containing 0.3% Triton X−100 and 4% bovine serum albumin for 1 hour at room temperature, and were then stained with the desired primary antibody reconstituted in PBS, 2% goat serum at 4°C for 14–16 hours. Dilutions of the anti-Etk (Cell Signaling), anti-neurofilament M (NF), anti-GFAP (Transduction Laboratories) antibodies were 1∶100. After three rinses in PBS, sections were incubated with goat anti-rabbit IgG FITC conjugate (1∶100 Jackson Immunoresearch) and goat anti-mouse IgG Rhodamine conjugate (1∶100; Jackson Immunoresearch) for 1 hour at room temperature. 1mg/mL DAPI was added to the mixture during the last 15 minutes. After several washes in PBS, sections were mounted with Crystal Mount (Sigma) and analyzed using a Leica microscope, a SROT RTTM CCD camera (Diagnostic Instruments) or laser-scanning confocal microscope (Bio-Rad, MRC-1000).
Statistics
Data are presented as mean ± SD. Oneway ANOVA and post-hoc Newman-Keuls tests were used for statistical comparison. A statistically significant difference was defined at p<0.05.
Results
Impact Increased Etk Expression Compared to the Contralateral Hemisphere
PCR product (Figure 1A), real-time PCR analysis(Figure 1B), and Western blot analysis(Figure 1C) demonstrated that Etk expression is increased post-impact injury when compared to the normal cortex. Upregulated Etk expression levels were observed after trauma by both PCR and Western blot analyses (Figure 1A, C). The expression of Etk increased in the single impact groups by 2.36-fold (Figure 1B). Expression increased up to 7fold when impact was performed twice. (Figure 1B, *p<0.05, One-Way ANOVA, posthoc Newman-Keuls test).
Figure 1
Etk is up-regulated after TBI. (A, B) Extracts of rat brains treated without impact (Normal), impacted once (impact1) or impacted twice (impact2) were subjected to real- time PCR analysis.
Expression of GAPDH mRNA was used as internal control. The relative Etk level of the impact1 rat was used as the fold increase compared to left brain of normal rat. L = left brain. R = right brain. (C) Western blots were done with antibodies to Etk and actin (loading control).
Expression of Etk is Related to Trauma Severity as shown by Western Blot Analysis
Since an increase in Etk level was observed upon impact with a marked further increase observed upon second impact, the correlation of the expression of Etk with trauma severity was examined. Differing degrees of cortical injury were induced using the CCI model with 2.5m/s and 5m/s speed settings. Although S100 increased after impact, the level of increase did not vary among the different trauma severity groups. Conversely, the increase in the level of Etk upregulation upon impact showed statistically significant differences between groups with varied trauma severity (Figure 2A, 2B, *p<0.05, One-Way ANOVA, posthoc Newman-Keuls test). Western blot analysis of Etk correlated with the degree of injury severity revealed by TTC staining. (Figure 3).
Figure 2
Correlation of Etk and S100 expression with severity of impact.
(A, B) Western blots revealing expression of Etk was upregulated nearly 2-fold in rats receiving controlled cortical impact at 2.5 M/s and was further increased to 2.7-fold when impact speed was increased to 5M/s. S100 was increased to more than 2.5 fold after impact at these speeds.
Figure 3
Triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining of brain having received CCI.
(A) Figure indicating location of site of induced trauma. (B) Size of injured cortex was also increased proportionally to the speed of impact using triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining.
Etk and GFAP Increase with Respect to Time after TBI shown by Western Blot Analysis
The expression of Etk and GFAP increased with respect to time after injury. GFAP responded at a later stage and lasted for up to 7 days. In contrast, Etk upregulation appeared significant at 1 hour post-injury and continued to increase until 4 days after injury (Figure 4A, 4B, *p<0.05, One-Way ANOVA, post hoc Newman-Keuls test).
Figure 4
Time course of changes in Etk and GFAP levels after controlled cortical impact.
(A) Western blot of Etk and GFAP expression at 1 hour, 3 hours, 6 hours, 4 days and 7 days after impact. (B) Densitometric analysis of Etk and GFAP western blot results revealing a significant increase at 3 hours after impact for Etk and at 4 days for GFAP. Values are expressed as mean±SD of three different experiments. *P<0.05 vs sham.
Location of Etk and GFAP with Respect to Injury Site shown by Immunofluorescence Analysis
Etk and GFAP were localized in the impacted hemisphere receiving mild CCI evidenced by increased fluorescence signals for Etk and GFAP near the injury site. Levels of expression decreased as distance from the injury site increased (Figure 5A, 5B). Etk also exhibited colocalization with neurofilament immunostaining (Figure 5C), suggesting the increase in Etk occurs in neurons. These findings suggest the increase in Etk level arises from direct injury to the neurons at the injury site.
Figure 5
Immunofluorescence of Etk and GFAP at the injury site after controlled cortical impact.
(A,B) Both Etk and GFAP was detectable near the injury site, and the intensity of the immunofluorescence signal for both proteins decreases as distance increases away from injury site. (C) Etk exhibits colocalization with neurofilament immunostaining.
Only Etk and Trauma/inflammation Related Markers, but not Other Tyrosine Kinases, Increased after TBI
Western blot analyses at various times after TBI in rats revealed increased levels of only trauma related markers and Etk. Other tyrosine kinases and signal transduction proteins such as Tec, Btk, Src, FAK, Stat 3, Bcl2, LC3 appeared unchanged after trauma (Figure 6). The increase in Etk, but not other proteins, suggests that induction of Etk is specific for traumatic brain injury.
Figure 6
Western blot analysis for other proteins at various times after impact.
Other tyrosine kinases (Tec, Btk, Src, FAK)and signal transduction proteins (Stat3, Bcl2, LC3 ) were analyzed after impact, Etk was uniquely upregulated after injury.
Discussion
Etk may be an Indicator for Trauma Severity
Our results support the correlation of Etk upregulation with trauma severity in rats. Based on the increase in Etk expression in the injured cortex post-impact demonstrated by Western blot, PCR, and RT-PCR, we postulate that Etk is associated with traumatic brain injury. The correlation between the levels of Etk expression with severity of injury was demonstrated by using different degrees of controlled cortical impact. Furthermore, the level of Etk increased as early as 1 hour after injury and a gradual increase continued for 3 days or more. These increases in Etk expression were further demonstrated by immunostaining and correlated inversely with distance from the injury site. Taken together, the increase in Etk observed with the increased number of impacts, the severity of impact, and its time course after impact as well as its inverse correlation with distance away from injury support the possible role of Etk as a potential indicator for traumatic neural injury severity.
Comparison to Other Markers
S100 and GFAP are two of the more accepted markers for neural injury. Although both Etk and S100 increased after trauma, a difference in degree of increase with respect to injury severity was not observed for S100, yet was clearly demonstrated in the expression of Etk. Furthermore, although both Etk and GFAP expression demonstrated a timedependent increase after trauma, the increase in Etk expression levelwas statistically significant at 3 hours after trauma. In contrast, the level of expression for GFAP was not significantly different at 1 day post-trauma but increased nearly 2- fold at 4 days post-trauma. With immunostaining of GFAP and Etk, the difference between the two was equally apparent at the site of injury, and both exhibited decreasing expression at distances further away from the injury site.
Etk is Uniquely Upregulated by TBI and may be a Potential Neurotrauma Biomarker
The upregulation of Etk is both temporally and spatially correlated with injury. The upregulation responded more rapidly to injury compared to GFAP.Similar post-trauma upregulation was not observed with other tyrosine kinases of the same class or with several other major signal transduction proteins in our study. Thus, Etk appears to be uniquely upregulated after trauma and may be a marker indicating trauma severity.There are still several obstacles to be overcome before Etk can be developed into a clinical biomarker for TBI severity. As current detection of Etk in serum still has unresolved problems, we are currently investigating the possibility of detecting substrates of Etk as an alternative. In addition, while the expression of Etk is present in other tissues such as bone marrow, and may be elevated even in the absence of neuronal injury, its unique increase after TBI may still provide pertinent information when used in combination with other nerual or non-neural trauma markers.In conclusion, unique Etk upregulation with respect to traumatic neural injury severity suggests a possible role of Etk as a neurotrauma marker.Its feasibility as an indicator for neurotrauma severity in human clinical settings warrants further clinical investigation.
Authors: Jane Topolovec-Vranic; Mary-Ann Pollmann-Mudryj; Donna Ouchterlony; David Klein; Julie Spence; Alexander Romaschin; Shawn Rhind; Homer C Tien; Andrew J Baker Journal: J Trauma Date: 2011-11
Authors: Yun He; Yan Luo; Shibo Tang; Iiro Rajantie; Petri Salven; Matthias Heil; Rong Zhang; Dianhong Luo; Xianghong Li; Hongbo Chi; Jun Yu; Peter Carmeliet; Wolfgang Schaper; Albert J Sinusas; William C Sessa; Kari Alitalo; Wang Min Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2006-08-24 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Andrea Gyorgy; Geoffrey Ling; Daniel Wingo; John Walker; Lawrence Tong; Steve Parks; Adolph Januszkiewicz; Richard Baumann; Denes V Agoston Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2011-05-25 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Christine D Palmer; Brenda E Mutch; Sarita Workman; John P McDaid; Nicole J Horwood; Brian M J Foxwell Journal: Blood Date: 2007-11-19 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Andrew K Ottens; Erin C Golden; Liliana Bustamante; Ronald L Hayes; Nancy D Denslow; Kevin K W Wang Journal: J Neurochem Date: 2007-11-22 Impact factor: 5.372
Authors: Diana G Hernandez-Ontiveros; Naoki Tajiri; Sandra Acosta; Brian Giunta; Jun Tan; Cesar V Borlongan Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2013-03-26 Impact factor: 4.003