Literature DB >> 22723409

Implementing the new U.S. dual-use policy.

Carrie D Wolinetz1.   

Abstract

After a decade of intensive policy discussions on the topic of dual-use research of concern (DURC) in the life sciences, there has been a lack of consensus on how to practically define DURC; whether it is feasible to identify and regulate DURC experiments; how to address the risks associated with DURC; and how to balance this risk with the necessity of fostering life sciences research for public health and biodefense. The publication of two avian influenza studies has brought the DURC issue back into sharp focus and has resulted in a new set of federal guidelines. However, the new DURC policy raises questions regarding whether this is the best policy solution to a complicated biosecurity concern.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22723409     DOI: 10.1126/science.1223995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  5 in total

1.  Protecting society. Biological security and dual-use dilemma in the life sciences--status quo and options for the future.

Authors:  Christine Uhlenhaut; Reinhard Burger; Lars Schaade
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  The concept of governance in dual-use research.

Authors:  Alex Dubov
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2014-08

3.  H5N1 avian flu research and the ethics of knowledge.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 2.683

4.  Exposing participants? Population biobanks go geo.

Authors:  Jasper Adriaan Bovenberg; Bartha Maria Knoppers; Anna Hansell; Kees de Hoogh
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Dual use research: investigation across multiple science disciplines.

Authors:  Shannon Oltmann
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.777

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.