Literature DB >> 22723010

Aneuploidy screening for embryo selection.

Elpida Fragouli1, Dagan Wells.   

Abstract

Chromosome abnormalities are extremely common in human oocytes and embryos and are associated with a variety of negative outcomes for both natural cycles and those using assisted conception techniques. Embryos containing the wrong number of chromosomes (aneuploidy) may fail to implant in the uterus, miscarry, or lead to children with serious medical problems (e.g., Down syndrome). Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) is a method that seeks to improve the outcomes of assisted reproductive treatments, such as in vitro fertilization (IVF), by ensuring that the embryos chosen for transfer to the uterus are chromosomally normal. Here we summarize published and novel data concerning the frequency and variety of chromosomal abnormalities seen in oocytes and embryos at the cleavage and blastocyst stages of development. Clinical outcomes of studies using PGS are presented, and the controversy over the use of chromosome screening as a tool for embryo selection is discussed. We describe validation and preliminary clinical data from the new generation of methods being used for PGS, including comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), microarrays (aCGH and single nucleotide polymorphism arrays), and quantitative polymerase chain reaction. These methodologies allow comprehensive chromosomal analysis, provide high accuracy, and have yielded encouraging preliminary clinical data. The combination of advances in genetics and embryology seems poised to usher in a new era in the treatment of infertility. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22723010     DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1313908

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Reprod Med        ISSN: 1526-4564            Impact factor:   1.303


  12 in total

1.  Familial haplotyping and embryo analysis for Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) using DNA microarrays: a proof of principle study.

Authors:  G Altarescu; D A Zeevi; S Zeligson; S Perlberg; T Eldar-Geva; E J Margalioth; E Levy-Lahad; P Renbaum
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) with Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) following day 3 single cell blastomere biopsy markedly improves IVF outcomes while lowering multiple pregnancies and miscarriages.

Authors:  Martin D Keltz; Mario Vega; Ido Sirota; Matthew Lederman; Erin L Moshier; Eric Gonzales; Daniel Stein
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Comprehensive pre-implantation genetic screening: ethical reflection urgently needed.

Authors:  Kristien Hens; Wybo Dondorp; Joep Geraedts; Guido de Wert
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Two different microarray technologies for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening, due to reciprocal translocation imbalances, demonstrate equivalent euploidy and clinical pregnancy rates.

Authors:  Kyle J Tobler; Paul R Brezina; Andrew T Benner; Luke Du; Xin Xu; William G Kearns
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  Could time-lapse embryo imaging reduce the need for biopsy and PGS?

Authors:  Jason E Swain
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Is it time for a paradigm shift in understanding embryo selection?

Authors:  Norbert Gleicher; Vitaly A Kushnir; David H Barad
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2015-01-11       Impact factor: 5.211

7.  Aberrant expression of maternal Plk1 and Dctn3 results in the developmental failure of human in-vivo- and in-vitro-matured oocytes.

Authors:  Yong Fan; Hong-Cui Zhao; Jianqiao Liu; Tao Tan; Ting Ding; Rong Li; Yue Zhao; Jie Yan; Xiaofang Sun; Yang Yu; Jie Qiao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: Prenatal Testing for Embryos Finally Achieving Its Potential.

Authors:  Harvey J Stern
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Selection of euploid blastocysts for cryopreservation with array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) results in increased implantation rates in subsequent frozen and thawed embryo transfer cycles.

Authors:  Zhihong Yang; Shala A Salem; Xiaohong Liu; Yanping Kuang; Rifaat D Salem; Jiaen Liu
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  Utilizing FMR1 gene mutations as predictors of treatment success in human in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Vitaly A Kushnir; Yao Yu; David H Barad; Andrea Weghofer; Eric Himaya; Ho-Joon Lee; Yan-Guang Wu; Aya Shohat-Tal; Emanuela Lazzaroni-Tealdi; Norbert Gleicher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.