BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the bioequivalence of intravenous and oral lacosamide (tablet), an antiepileptic drug. METHODS: Two randomized, single-dose (200 mg) trials were conducted: a 2-way trial (study A, 15-min infusion, oral tablet) and a 3-way crossover trial (study B, 30- and 60-min infusions, oral tablet). Twenty four healthy men participated in study A and 27 in study B. Eighteen blood samples were taken before to 72 h after lacosamide administration during each treatment period, followed by a 1-week washout. Safety and the ratio of intravenous/oral lacosamide for AUC(0-tz) (area under the concentration-time curve from zero up to the last measurable plasma concentration) and C(max) (maximum plasma concentration) were evaluated. RESULTS: For AUC(0-tz) and C(max), 90% confidence intervals for the ratio of intravenous/oral lacosamide fell within the predetermined bioequivalence range (80-125%) for 30- and 60-min infusions. In study A, all adverse events (AEs) were mild, with no discontinuations. In study B, 3 volunteers discontinued due to AEs; one serious AE (epiglottitis) was reported. No clinically relevant effects on vital signs, electrocardiograms or laboratory parameters and no AEs relating to infusion site were reported. CONCLUSION: Intravenous infusions (15, 30 and 60 min) of 200 mg lacosamide are as well tolerated as the oral tablet. Bioequivalence was demonstrated for 30- and 60-min infusions; therefore, direct conversion from oral to intravenous lacosamide, or vice versa, is possible.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the bioequivalence of intravenous and oral lacosamide (tablet), an antiepileptic drug. METHODS: Two randomized, single-dose (200 mg) trials were conducted: a 2-way trial (study A, 15-min infusion, oral tablet) and a 3-way crossover trial (study B, 30- and 60-min infusions, oral tablet). Twenty four healthy men participated in study A and 27 in study B. Eighteen blood samples were taken before to 72 h after lacosamide administration during each treatment period, followed by a 1-week washout. Safety and the ratio of intravenous/oral lacosamide for AUC(0-tz) (area under the concentration-time curve from zero up to the last measurable plasma concentration) and C(max) (maximum plasma concentration) were evaluated. RESULTS: For AUC(0-tz) and C(max), 90% confidence intervals for the ratio of intravenous/oral lacosamide fell within the predetermined bioequivalence range (80-125%) for 30- and 60-min infusions. In study A, all adverse events (AEs) were mild, with no discontinuations. In study B, 3 volunteers discontinued due to AEs; one serious AE (epiglottitis) was reported. No clinically relevant effects on vital signs, electrocardiograms or laboratory parameters and no AEs relating to infusion site were reported. CONCLUSION: Intravenous infusions (15, 30 and 60 min) of 200 mg lacosamide are as well tolerated as the oral tablet. Bioequivalence was demonstrated for 30- and 60-min infusions; therefore, direct conversion from oral to intravenous lacosamide, or vice versa, is possible.
Authors: Sebastian Bauer; Laurent M Willems; Esther Paule; Christine Petschow; Johann Philipp Zöllner; Felix Rosenow; Adam Strzelczyk Journal: Ther Adv Neurol Disord Date: 2016-11-29 Impact factor: 6.570
Authors: Keith G Phillips; Rolf-Detlef Treede; André Mouraux; Petra Bloms-Funke; Irmgard Boesl; Ombretta Caspani; Sonya C Chapman; Giulia Di Stefano; Nanna Brix Finnerup; Luis Garcia-Larrea; Marcus Goetz; Anna Kostenko; Bernhard Pelz; Esther Pogatzki-Zahn; Karin Schubart; Alexandre Stouffs; Andrea Truini; Irene Tracey; Iñaki F Troconiz; Johannes Van Niel; Jose Miguel Vela; Katy Vincent; Jan Vollert; Vishvarani Wanigasekera; Matthias Wittayer Journal: Trials Date: 2021-06-17 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Zahra Nochi; Hossein Pia; Petra Bloms-Funke; Irmgard Boesl; Ombretta Caspani; Sonya C Chapman; Francesca Fardo; Bernd Genser; Marcus Goetz; Anna V Kostenko; Caterina Leone; Thomas Li; André Mouraux; Bernhard Pelz; Esther Pogatzki-Zahn; Andreas Schilder; Erik Schnetter; Karin Schubart; Alexandre Stouffs; Irene Tracey; Iñaki F Troconiz; Andrea Truini; Johannes Van Niel; Jose Miguel Vela; Katy Vincent; Jan Vollert; Vishvarani Wanigasekera; Matthias Wittayer; Hatice Tankisi; Nanna B Finnerup; Keith G Phillips; Rolf-Detlef Treede Journal: Trials Date: 2022-02-19 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Caterina Leone; Giulia Di Stefano; Keith G Phillips; Andrea Truini; Rolf-Detlef Treede; Giuseppe Di Pietro; Petra Bloms-Funke; Irmgard Boesl; Ombretta Caspani; Sonya C Chapman; Nanna Brix Finnerup; Luis Garcia-Larrea; Tom Li; Marcus Goetz; André Mouraux; Bernhard Pelz; Esther Pogatzki-Zahn; Andreas Schilder; Erik Schnetter; Karin Schubart; Irene Tracey; Inaki F Troconiz; Hans Van Niel; Jose Miguel Vela Hernandez; Katy Vincent; Jan Vollert; Vishvarani Wanigasekera; Matthias Wittayer Journal: Trials Date: 2022-09-05 Impact factor: 2.728