Literature DB >> 22722546

Electron specific absorbed fractions for the adult male and female ICRP/ICRU reference computational phantoms.

Maria Zankl1, Helmut Schlattl, Nina Petoussi-Henss, Christoph Hoeschen.   

Abstract

The calculation of radiation dose from internally incorporated radionuclides is based on so-called absorbed fractions (AFs) and specific absorbed fractions (SAFs). SAFs for monoenergetic electrons were calculated for 63 source regions and 67 target regions using the new male and female adult reference computational phantoms adopted by the ICRP and ICRU and the Monte Carlo radiation transport programme package EGSnrc. The SAF values for electrons are opposed to the simplifying assumptions of ICRP Publication 30. The previously applied assumption of electrons being fully absorbed in the source organ itself is not always true at electron energies above approximately 300-500 keV. High-energy electrons have the ability to leave the source organ and, consequently, the electron SAFs for neighbouring organs can reach the same magnitude as those for photons for electron energies above 1 MeV. The reciprocity principle known for photons can be extended to electron SAFs as well, thus making cross-fire electron SAFs mass-independent. To quantify the impact of the improved electron dosimetry in comparison to the dosimetry using the simple assumptions of ICRP Publication 30, absorbed doses per administered activity of three radiopharmaceuticals were evaluated with and without explicit electron transport. The organ absorbed doses per administered activity for the two evaluation methods agree within 2%-3% for most organs for radionuclides with decay spectra having electron energies below a few hundred keV and within approximately 20% if higher electron energies are involved. An important exception is the urinary bladder wall, where the dose is overestimated by 60-150% using the simplified ICRP 30 approach for the radiopharmaceuticals of this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22722546     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/14/4501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  8 in total

Review 1.  Task-based measures of image quality and their relation to radiation dose and patient risk.

Authors:  Harrison H Barrett; Kyle J Myers; Christoph Hoeschen; Matthew A Kupinski; Mark P Little
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  S values for 131I based on the ICRP adult voxel phantoms.

Authors:  Stephanie Lamart; Steven L Simon; Andre Bouville; Brian E Moroz; Choonsik Lee
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 0.972

3.  Finding sensitive parameters in internal dose calculations for radiopharmaceuticals commonly used in clinical nuclear medicine.

Authors:  Vladimir Spielmann; Wei Bo Li; Maria Zankl
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Evaluation of Functionalized Polysaccharide Microparticles Dosimetry for SPECT Imaging Based on Biodistribution Data of Rats.

Authors:  Aurélie Desbrée; Thomas Bonnard; Eric Blanchardon; Anne Petiet; Didier Franck; Cedric Chauvierre; Catherine Le Visage
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  IDAC-Dose 2.1, an internal dosimetry program for diagnostic nuclear medicine based on the ICRP adult reference voxel phantoms.

Authors:  Martin Andersson; Lennart Johansson; Keith Eckerman; Sören Mattsson
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 3.138

6.  Comparison of different methods for post-therapeutic dosimetry in [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy.

Authors:  Florian Rosar; Niklas Schön; Hendrik Bohnenberger; Mark Bartholomä; Tobias Stemler; Stephan Maus; Fadi Khreish; Samer Ezziddin; Andrea Schaefer-Schuler
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2021-05-05

7.  Effective dose to adult patients from 338 radiopharmaceuticals estimated using ICRP biokinetic data, ICRP/ICRU computational reference phantoms and ICRP 2007 tissue weighting factors.

Authors:  Martin Andersson; Lennart Johansson; David Minarik; Sigrid Leide-Svegborn; Sören Mattsson
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2014-09-29

8.  Uncertainty analysis in internal dose calculations for cerium considering the uncertainties of biokinetic parameters and S values.

Authors:  Vladimir Spielmann; Wei Bo Li; Maria Zankl; Juan Camilo Ocampo Ramos; Nina Petoussi-Henss
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2020-09-20       Impact factor: 1.925

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.