Literature DB >> 22722085

Eye shape and retinal topography in owls (Aves: Strigiformes).

Thomas J Lisney1, Andrew N Iwaniuk, Mischa V Bandet, Douglas R Wylie.   

Abstract

The eyes of vertebrates show adaptations to the visual environments in which they evolve. For example, eye shape is associated with activity pattern, while retinal topography is related to the symmetry or 'openness' of the habitat of a species. Although these relationships are well documented in many vertebrates including birds, the extent to which they hold true for species within the same avian order is not well understood. Owls (Strigiformes) represent an ideal group for the study of interspecific variation in the avian visual system because they are one of very few avian orders to contain species that vary in both activity pattern and habitat preference. Here, we examined interspecific variation in eye shape and retinal topography in nine species of owl. Eye shape (the ratio of corneal diameter to eye axial length) differed among species, with nocturnal species having relatively larger corneal diameters than diurnal species. All the owl species have an area of high retinal ganglion cell (RGC) density in the temporal retina and a visual streak of increased cell density extending across the central retina from temporal to nasal. However, the organization and degree of elongation of the visual streak varied considerably among species and this variation was quantified using H:V ratios. Species that live in open habitats and/or that are more diurnally active have well-defined, elongated visual streaks and high H:V ratios (3.88-2.33). In contrast, most nocturnal and/or forest-dwelling owls have a poorly defined visual streak, a more radially symmetrical arrangement of RGCs and lower H:V ratios (1.77-1.27). The results of a hierarchical cluster analysis indicate that the apparent interspecific variation is associated with activity pattern and habitat as opposed to the phylogenetic relationships among species. In seven species, the presence of a fovea was confirmed and it is suggested that all strigid owls may possess a fovea, whereas the tytonid barn owl (Tyto alba) does not. A size-frequency analysis of cell soma area indicates that a number of different RGC classes are represented in owls, including a population of large RGCs (cell soma area >150 µm(2)) that resemble the giant RGCs reported in other vertebrates. In conclusion, eye shape and retinal topography in owls vary among species and this variation is associated with different activity patterns and habitat preferences, thereby supporting similar observations in other vertebrates.
Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22722085     DOI: 10.1159/000337760

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Behav Evol        ISSN: 0006-8977            Impact factor:   1.808


  15 in total

1.  Eye shape and the nocturnal bottleneck of mammals.

Authors:  Margaret I Hall; Jason M Kamilar; E Christopher Kirk
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Ecomorphology of eye shape and retinal topography in waterfowl (Aves: Anseriformes: Anatidae) with different foraging modes.

Authors:  Thomas J Lisney; Karyn Stecyk; Jeffrey Kolominsky; Brian K Schmidt; Jeremy R Corfield; Andrew N Iwaniuk; Douglas R Wylie
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-03-10       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Interspecifc variation in eye shape and retinal topography in seven species of galliform bird (Aves: Galliformes: Phasianidae).

Authors:  Thomas J Lisney; Andrew N Iwaniuk; Jeffrey Kolominsky; Mischa V Bandet; Jeremy R Corfield; Douglas R Wylie
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Retinal ganglion cell topography and spatial resolution of two parrot species: budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus) and Bourke's parrot (Neopsephotus bourkii).

Authors:  Mindaugas Mitkus; Sandra Chaib; Olle Lind; Almut Kelber
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Müller cell alignment in bird fovea: possible role in vision.

Authors:  Serguei Skatchkov; Mikhail Inyushin; Lidia Zueva; Vladimir Makarov; Astrid Zayas-Santiago; Tatiana Golubeva; Elena Korneeva; Alexey Savvinov; Misty Eaton
Journal:  J Neurosci Neuroeng       Date:  2014-12-01

6.  Not like night and day: the nocturnal letter-winged kite does not differ from diurnal congeners in orbit or endocast morphology.

Authors:  Aubrey Keirnan; Trevor H Worthy; Jeroen B Smaers; Karine Mardon; Andrew N Iwaniuk; Vera Weisbecker
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 3.653

Review 7.  Understanding the retinal basis of vision across species.

Authors:  Tom Baden; Thomas Euler; Philipp Berens
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 34.870

8.  Anatomical study of the scleral ring and eyeball of the long-eared owl (Asio otus) with anatomical methods and diagnostic imaging techniques.

Authors:  Omid Zehtabvar; Majid Masoudifard; Okan Ekim; Faezeh Ghorbani; Somaye Davudypoor; Iman Memarian; Paniz Zarghami Dastjerdi
Journal:  Vet Med Sci       Date:  2022-05-04

9.  Early evolution of diurnal habits in owls (Aves, Strigiformes) documented by a new and exquisitely preserved Miocene owl fossil from China.

Authors:  Zhiheng Li; Thomas A Stidham; Xiaoting Zheng; Yan Wang; Tao Zhao; Tao Deng; Zhonghe Zhou
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 12.779

10.  Niche convergence suggests functionality of the nocturnal fovea.

Authors:  Gillian L Moritz; Amanda D Melin; Fred Tuh Yit Yu; Henry Bernard; Perry S Ong; Nathaniel J Dominy
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.