Literature DB >> 22721891

Recovery time of motor evoked potentials following lengthening and shortening muscle action in the tibialis anterior.

J Tallent1, S Goodall, T Hortobágyi, A St Clair Gibson, D N French, G Howatson.   

Abstract

Motor evoked potentials (MEP) at rest remain facilitated following an isometric muscle contraction. Because the pre-synaptic and post-synaptic control of shortening (SHO) and lengthening (LEN) contractions differs, the possibility exists that the recovery of the MEP is also task specific. The time course of MEP recovery was assessed in the tibialis anterior following SHO and LEN (0.26 rad/s) at 25% and 80% of maximal voluntary contraction. Following LEN and SHO contractions, the MEP recovered to baseline levels within 10s. Despite task-specific differences between SHO and LEN contractions, the MEP facilitation from the augmented neurotransmitter release appears to be short lasting and not influenced by contraction type.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22721891     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2012.01.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0967-5868            Impact factor:   1.961


  4 in total

Review 1.  The use of transcranial magnetic stimulation to evaluate cortical excitability of lower limb musculature: Challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Trisha M Kesar; James W Stinear; Steven L Wolf
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 2.  Corticospinal responses to sustained locomotor exercises: moving beyond single-joint studies of central fatigue.

Authors:  Simranjit K Sidhu; Andrew G Cresswell; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Repeatability of corticospinal and spinal measures during lengthening and shortening contractions in the human tibialis anterior muscle.

Authors:  Jamie Tallent; Stuart Goodall; Tibor Hortobágyi; Alan St Clair Gibson; Duncan N French; Glyn Howatson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Compound maximal motor unit response is modulated by contraction intensity, but not contraction type in tibialis anterior.

Authors:  Jamie Tallent; Stuart Goodall; Dawson J Kidgell; Rade Durbaba; Glyn Howatson
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2019-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.