OBJECTIVES: Left ventricular end systolic pressure (LV ESP) is important in assessing left ventricular performance and is usually derived from prediction equations. It is unknown whether these equations are accurate at rest or following exercise in a young, healthy population. DESIGN: Measured LV ESP vs. LV ESP values from the prediction equations were compared at rest, 15 min and 30 min following peak aerobic exercise in 60 participants. METHODS: LV ESP was obtained by applanation tonometry at rest, 15 min post and 30 min post peak cycle exercise. RESULTS: Measured LV ESP was significantly lower (p<0.05) at all time points in comparison to the two calculated values. Measured LV ESP decreased significantly from rest at both the post15 and post30 time points (p<0.05) and changed differently in comparison to the calculated values (significant interaction; p<0.05). The two LV ESP equations were also significantly different from each other (p<0.05) and changed differently over time (significant interaction; p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The two commonly used prediction equations did not accurately predict either resting or post exercise LV ESP in a young, healthy population. Thus, LV ESP needs to be individually determined in young, healthy participants. Non-invasive measurement through applanation tonometry appears to allow for a more accurate determination of LV ESP.
OBJECTIVES:Left ventricular end systolic pressure (LV ESP) is important in assessing left ventricular performance and is usually derived from prediction equations. It is unknown whether these equations are accurate at rest or following exercise in a young, healthy population. DESIGN: Measured LV ESP vs. LV ESP values from the prediction equations were compared at rest, 15 min and 30 min following peak aerobic exercise in 60 participants. METHODS: LV ESP was obtained by applanation tonometry at rest, 15 min post and 30 min post peak cycle exercise. RESULTS: Measured LV ESP was significantly lower (p<0.05) at all time points in comparison to the two calculated values. Measured LV ESP decreased significantly from rest at both the post15 and post30 time points (p<0.05) and changed differently in comparison to the calculated values (significant interaction; p<0.05). The two LV ESP equations were also significantly different from each other (p<0.05) and changed differently over time (significant interaction; p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The two commonly used prediction equations did not accurately predict either resting or post exercise LV ESP in a young, healthy population. Thus, LV ESP needs to be individually determined in young, healthy participants. Non-invasive measurement through applanation tonometry appears to allow for a more accurate determination of LV ESP.
Authors: C H Chen; B Fetics; E Nevo; C E Rochitte; K R Chiou; P A Ding; M Kawaguchi; D A Kass Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Michel E Safar; Jacques Blacher; Bruno Pannier; Alain P Guerin; Sylvain J Marchais; Pierre-Marie Guyonvarc'h; Gérard M London Journal: Hypertension Date: 2002-03-01 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Samer S Najjar; Steven P Schulman; Gary Gerstenblith; Jerome L Fleg; David A Kass; Frances O'Connor; Lewis C Becker; Edward G Lakatta Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-08-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Gary F Mitchell; Helen Parise; Emelia J Benjamin; Martin G Larson; Michelle J Keyes; Joseph A Vita; Ramachandran S Vasan; Daniel Levy Journal: Hypertension Date: 2004-05-03 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Jacqueline A Augustine; Wesley K Lefferts; Jacob P DeBlois; Tiago V Barreira; Beth A Taylor; Kan Liu; Kevin S Heffernan Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2021-09-13 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: A D Lane; H Yan; S M Ranadive; R M Kappus; P Sun; M D Cook; I Harvey; J Woods; K Wilund; B Fernhall Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2014-08-21 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Luca Faconti; Rosa Maria Bruno; Simona Buralli; Marta Barzacchi; Elisa Dal Canto; Lorenzo Ghiadoni; Stefano Taddei Journal: JRSM Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2017-02-01
Authors: Amy M Nicks; Scott H Kesteven; Ming Li; Jianxin Wu; Andrea Y Chan; Nawazish Naqvi; Ahsan Husain; Michael P Feneley; Nicola J Smith; Siiri E Iismaa; Robert M Graham Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-09-18 Impact factor: 4.379