| Literature DB >> 22720034 |
Philippe Henry1, Zijian Sim, Michael A Russello.
Abstract
When faced with rapidly changing environments, wildlife species are left to adapt, disperse or disappear. Consequently, there is value in investigating the connectivity of populations of species inhabiting different environments in order to evaluate dispersal as a potential strategy for persistence in the face of climate change. Here, we begin to investigate the processes that shape genetic variation within American pika populations from the northern periphery of their range, the central Coast Mountains of British Columbia, Canada. At these latitudes, pikas inhabit sharp elevation gradients ranging from sea level to 1500 m, providing an excellent system for studying the effects of local environmental conditions on pika population genetic structure and gene flow. We found low levels of neutral genetic variation compared to previous studies from more southerly latitudes, consistent with the relatively recent post-glacial colonization of the study location. Moreover, significant levels of inbreeding and marked genetic structure were detected within and among sites. Although low levels of recent gene flow were revealed among elevations within a transect, potentially admixed individuals and first generation migrants were identified using discriminant analysis of principal components between populations separated by less than five kilometers at the same elevations. There was no evidence for historical population decline, yet there was signal for recent demographic contractions, possibly resulting from environmental stochasticity. Correlative analyses revealed an association between patterns of genetic variation and annual heat-to-moisture ratio, mean annual precipitation, precipitation as snow and mean maximum summer temperature. Changes in climatic regimes forecasted for the region may thus potentially increase the rate of population extirpation by further reducing dispersal between sites. Consequently, American pika may have to rely on local adaptations or phenotypic plasticity in order to survive predicted climate changes, although additional studies are required to investigate the evolutionary potential of this climate change sensitive species.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22720034 PMCID: PMC3376113 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039077
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Map of the study area in the Bella Coola Valley, British Columbia, Canada, with the ten sampling sites located along three altitudinal gradients (lowest and highest elevations indicated): the Hill, Nusatsum and Bentinck from east to west.
The light shading indicates Tweedsmuir South Provincial Park. The inset on the top left indicates the distribution of O. princeps subspecies.
Site-specific information including site names, transect, geographical location, elevation, sample size (N), observed (Ho) and expected (He) heterozygosites, number of alleles (Na), allelic richness (Ar), and within-site inbreeding coefficient (Fis), values in brackets indicate Standard Error.
| Site | Transect | Latitude | Longitude | Elevation (m) | N | Ho | He | Na | Ar | Fis |
| A1 | Hill | N52° 18' 36" | W125° 29' 47" | 1433 | 15 | 0.51 (0.23) | 0.58 (0.19) | 3.2 (1.0) | 2.8 (0.84) | 0.10 |
| A2 | Hill | N52° 18' 26" | W125° 29' 34" | 1338 | 6 | 0.40 (0.31) | 0.61 (0.13) | 3.1 (1.3) | 2.6 (1.29) | 0.38 |
| B | Hill | N52° 15' 9" | W125° 31' 39" | 793 | 17 | 0.63 (0.17) | 0.67 (0.11) | 4.4 (1.7) | 3.5 (0.82) |
|
| C | Hill | N52° 14' 56" | W125° 32' 14" | 362 | 26 | 0.52 (0.15) | 0.68 (0.09) | 4.6 (1.2) | 3.5 (0.64) | 0.23 |
| D | Hill | N52° 14' 49" | W125° 33' 15" | 301 | 32 | 0.56 (0.14) | 0.69 (0.08) | 5.4 (1.4) | 3.7 (0.70) | 0.20 |
| E | Hill | N52° 14' 39" | W125° 31' 14" | 329 | 21 | 0.55 (0.18) | 0.60 (0.09) | 5.0 (1.2) | 3.2 (0.42) | 0.08 |
| F | Nusatsum | N52° 9' 37" | W126° 11' 29" | 707 | 10 | 0.38 (0.19) | 0.56 (0.14) | 3.2 (0.6) | 2.9 (0.48) | 0.34 |
| G | Nusatsum | N52° 7' 46" | W126° 13' 4" | 1058 | 30 | 0.46 (0.16) | 0.64 (0.14) | 4.3 (1.1) | 3.3 (0.63) | 0.28 |
| H | Bentinck | N52° 13' 21" | W126° 29' 22" | 2 | 5 | 0.45 (0.18) | 0.59 (0.12) | 2.6 (0.7) | 2.3 (0.95) | 0.26 |
| I | Bentinck | N52° 10' 22" | W126° 32' 5" | 1282 | 6 | 0.28 (0.19) | 0.36 (0.17) | 2.3 (0.5) | 1.7 (0.73) | 0.25 |
Pairwise population differentiation indices.
| A1 | A2 | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | |
| A1 | - | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * |
| A2 | 0.20 | - | * | * | * | * | * | * | NS | NS |
| B | 0.14 | 0.22 | - | * | * | * | * | * | * | * |
| C | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.11 | - | * | * | * | * | * | * |
| D | 0.15 | 0.22 | 0.11 | 0.05 | - | * | * | * | * | * |
| E | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.17 | 0.15 | 0.14 | - | * | * | * | * |
| F | 0.25 | 0.21 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.20 | 0.23 | - | * | * | * |
| G | 0.17 | 0.20 | 0.12 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.19 | 0.10 | - | * | |
| H | 0.26 | 0.29 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.25 | 0.29 | 0.25 | 0.19 | - | NS |
| I | 0.40 | 0.43 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.34 | 0.32 | 0.38 | 0.30 | 0.38 | - |
FST values are represented below the diagonal. Asterisks above the diagonal represent a significant differentiation based on log-likelihood G-tests (Goudet, 1996)
Figure 2Population structure in pikas from the Bella Coola Valley.
A. Scatter plot from the Discriminant Analysis of Principal Components (DAPC) [23] with a minimum spanning tree based on the squared distance between populations, showing the regional cohesion of sample sites into clusters that represent the three elevation gradients sampled. The centre of each group is indicated by a cross of the respective colour. Note that the distance between the Hill and the rest of the samples is not to scale (dashed line). B. Plot of membership probabilities, where each column represents an individual. Admixed individuals are defined as individuals that had less than 90% probability of membership to the site in which it was sampled and denoted by an open circle. Migrant individuals are denoted by full circles.
Mean estimates of the distribution of recent migration rates (m) calculated using Bayesass+ [28], given as the proportion of migrant individuals per population per generations.
| A1 | A2 | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | |
| A1 |
| 0.074 | 0.004 | 0.004 | 0.005 | 0.011 | 0.005 | 0.001 | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| A2 | 0.003 |
| 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.004 | 0.006 | 0.001 | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| B | 0.003 | 0.015 |
| 0.047 | 0.005 | 0.008 | 0.006 | 0.002 | 0.011 | 0.005 |
| C | 0.003 | 0.043 | 0.004 |
| 0.015 | 0.017 | 0.006 | 0.001 | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| D | 0.003 | 0.015 | 0.005 | 0.017 |
| 0.006 | 0.005 | 0.002 | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| E | 0.004 | 0.017 | 0.004 | 0.003 | 0.013 |
| 0.005 | 0.001 | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| F | 0.003 | 0.021 | 0.004 | 0.011 | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| 0.002 | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| G | 0.004 | 0.046 | 0.004 | 0.007 | 0.004 | 0.009 | 0.015 |
| 0.009 | 0.005 |
| H | 0.003 | 0.016 | 0.004 | 0.005 | 0.003 | 0.01 | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| 0.005 |
| I | 0.003 | 0.043 | 0.004 | 0.004 | 0.002 | 0.016 | 0.011 | 0.001 | 0.014 |
|
Columns represent the incoming migration rates and rows represent the outgoing migration rates. Bold values represent the proportion of non-migrant individuals in a population.