Literature DB >> 22719181

Update on risk scoring systems for patients with upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.

Adrian J Stanley.   

Abstract

Upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage (UGIH) remains a common medical emergency worldwide. It is increasingly recognised that early risk assessment is an important part of management, which helps direct appropriate patient care and the timing of endoscopy. Several risk scores have been developed, most of which include endoscopic findings, although a minority do not. These scores were developed to identify various end-points including mortality, rebleeding or clinical intervention in the form of transfusion, endoscopic therapy or surgery. Recent studies have reported accurate identification of a very low risk group on presentation, using scores which require simple clinical or laboratory parameters only. This group may not require admission, but could be managed with early out-patient endoscopy. This article aims to describe the existing pre- and post-endoscopy risk scores for UGIH and assess the published data comparing them in the prediction of outcome. Recent data assessing their use in clinical practice, in particular the early identification of low-risk patients, are also discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blatchford; Bleeding; Endoscopy; Risk assessment; Rockall; Scoring systems; Upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22719181      PMCID: PMC3374976          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i22.2739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  38 in total

1.  Validation of the Rockall scoring system for outcomes from non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a Canadian setting.

Authors:  Robert-A Enns; Yves-M Gagnon; Alan-N Barkun; David Armstrong; Jamie-C Gregor; Richard-N Fedorak
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Validity of the Rockall scoring system after endoscopic therapy for bleeding peptic ulcer: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Nicholas I Church; Helen J Dallal; John Masson; N Ashley G Mowat; David A Johnston; Esme Radin; Marc Turner; Grant Fullarton; Robin J Prescott; Kelvin R Palmer
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  A scoring system to predict rebleeding after endoscopic therapy of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, with a comparison of heat probe and ethanol injection.

Authors:  Z A Saeed; C B Winchester; P A Michaletz; K L Woods; D Y Graham
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Prospective evaluation of a clinical guideline recommending hospital length of stay in upper gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage.

Authors:  J A Hay; L Maldonado; S R Weingarten; A G Ellrodt
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997 Dec 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Successful outpatient management of acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: use of practice guidelines in a large patient series.

Authors:  G F Longstreth; S P Feitelberg
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Risk assessment after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.

Authors:  T A Rockall; R F Logan; H B Devlin; T C Northfield
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Simple clinical predictors may obviate urgent endoscopy in selected patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding.

Authors:  Joseph Romagnuolo; Alan N Barkun; Robert Enns; David Armstrong; Jamie Gregor
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-02-12

8.  Validation of the Rockall risk scoring system in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  E M Vreeburg; C B Terwee; P Snel; E A Rauws; J F Bartelsman; J H Meulen; G N Tytgat
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  A randomized study of the safety of outpatient care for patients with bleeding peptic ulcer treated by endoscopic injection.

Authors:  Enric Brullet; Rafel Campo; Xavier Calvet; Merce Guell; Neus Garcia-Monforte; Joan Cabrol
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Selection of patients for early discharge or outpatient care after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. National Audit of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage.

Authors:  T A Rockall; R F Logan; H B Devlin; T C Northfield
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-04-27       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  11 in total

1.  Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Non-ulcer and Non-variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Prospective Multicenter Study of Risk Prediction Using a Scoring System.

Authors:  Hyun Woo Park; Seong Woo Jeon
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  External validation of scoring systems in risk stratification of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Anna Cherian Anchu; Subair Mohsina; Sathasivam Sureshkumar; T Mahalakshmy; Vikram Kate
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-04-10

3.  Association of inferior vena cava diameter ratio with outcomes in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Namwoo Jo; Jaehoon Oh; Hyunggoo Kang; Tae Ho Lim; Byuk Sung Ko
Journal:  Clin Exp Emerg Med       Date:  2022-06-10

4.  A pilot study of single-use endoscopy in screening acute gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Jae Hee Cho; Hee Man Kim; Sangheun Lee; Yu Jin Kim; Ki Jun Han; Hyeon Geun Cho; Si Young Song
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Comparisons of six endoscopy independent scoring systems for the prediction of clinical outcomes for elderly and younger patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Yajie Li; Qin Lu; Mingyang Song; Kexuan Wu; Xilong Ou
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Use of glasgow-blatchford bleeding score reduces hospital stay duration and costs for patients with low-risk upper GI bleeding.

Authors:  Marc Girardin; David Bertolini; Saskia Ditisheim; Jean-Louis Frossard; Emiliano Giostra; Nicolas Goossens; Isabelle Morard; Thai Nguyen-Tang; Laurent Spahr; Alain Vonlaufen; Antoine Hadengue; Jean-Marc Dumonceau
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2014-05-07

7.  Evaluation of Six Preendoscopy Scoring Systems to Predict Outcomes for Older Adults with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

Authors:  Yajie Li; Qin Lu; Kexuan Wu; Xilong Ou
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 2.260

8.  Glasgow Blatchford Score of limited benefit for low-risk urban patients: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  David A Leiman; Angela M Mills; Frances S Shofer; Andrew T Weber; Erin R Leiman; Brian P Riff; James D Lewis; Shivan J Mehta
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-09-29

9.  Lactate Level Predicts Mortality in Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

Authors:  Muge Gulen; Salim Satar; Adnan Tas; Akkan Avci; Hakan Nazik; Basak Toptas Firat
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 2.260

10.  A Novel Easy-to-Use Prediction Scheme for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Cologne-WATCH (C-WATCH) Risk Score.

Authors:  Vera Hoffmann; Henrik Neubauer; Julia Heinzler; Anna Smarczyk; Martin Hellmich; Andrea Bowe; Fabian Kuetting; Muenevver Demir; Agnes Pelc; Sigrid Schulte; Ullrich Toex; Dirk Nierhoff; Hans-Michael Steffen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.