Literature DB >> 22718643

Is there a suitable point-of-care glucose meter for tight glycemic control? Evaluation of one home-use and four hospital-use meters in an intensive care unit.

Karlijn Gijzen1, David L J Moolenaar, Jos J A M Weusten, Hendrik J Pluim, Ayse Y Demir.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Implementation of tight glycemic control (TGC) and avoidance of hypoglycemia in intensive care unit (ICU) patients require frequent analysis of blood glucose. This can be achieved by accurate point-of-care (POC) hospital-use glucose meters. In this study one home-use and four different hospital-use POC glucose meters were evaluated in critically ill ICU patients.
METHODS: All patients (n = 80) requiring TGC were included in this study. For each patient three to six glucose measurements (n = 390) were performed. Blood glucose was determined by four hospital-use POC glucose meters, Roche Accu-Check Inform II System, HemoCue Glu201DM, Nova StatStrip, Abbott Precision Xceed Pro, and one home-use POC glucose meter, Menarini GlucoCard Memory PC. The criteria described in ISO 15197, Dutch TNO quality guideline and in NACB/ADA-2011 were applied in the comparisons.
RESULTS: According to the ISO 15197, the percentages of the measured values that fulfilled the criterion were 99.5% by Roche, 95.1% by HemoCue, 91.0% by Nova, 96.6% by Abbott, and 63.3% by Menarini. According to the TNO quality guideline these percentages were 96.1% , 91.0% , 81.8% , 94.2% , and 47.7% , respectively. Application of the NACB/ADA guideline resulted in percentages of 95.6%, 89.2%, 77.9%, 93.4%, and 45.4%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: When ISO 15197 was applied, Roche, HemoCue and Abbott fulfilled the criterion in this patient population, whereas Nova and Menarini did not. However, when TNO quality guideline and NACB/ADA 2011 guideline were applied only Roche fulfilled the criteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22718643     DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2012-0104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN: 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


  7 in total

Review 1.  Point-of-care blood glucose testing for diabetes care in hospitalized patients: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Rajesh Rajendran; Gerry Rayman
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-06-05

2.  Statistical transformation and the interpretation of inpatient glucose control data from the intensive care unit.

Authors:  George E Saulnier; Janna C Castro; Curtiss B Cook
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-02-27

Review 3.  Blood glucose measurement in the intensive care unit: what is the best method?

Authors:  Huong T Le; Neil S Harris; Abby J Estilong; Arvid Olson; Mark J Rice
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-03-01

4.  Inadequate Reporting of Analytical Characteristics of Biomarkers Used in Clinical Research: A Threat to Interpretation and Replication of Study Findings.

Authors:  Qian Sun; Kerry J Welsh; David E Bruns; David B Sacks; Zhen Zhao
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 8.327

5.  Early experiences with quality-assured HbA1c and professional glucose point-of-care testing in general practice: a cross-sectional observational study among patients, nurses and doctors.

Authors:  Marleen Smits; Rogier Hopstaken; Lusan Terhaag; Gijs de Kort; Paul Giesen
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2022-07-08

6.  Measuring and reporting glycemic control in clinical trials: building a path to consensus.

Authors:  Carmen L Soto-Rivera; Michael S D Agus
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Glucose Meter Use in the Intensive Care Unit: Much Ado About Something.

Authors:  S Karon Brad
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2014-09-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.