Literature DB >> 22718615

Head models and dynamic causal modeling of subcortical activity using magnetoencephalographic/electroencephalographic data.

Yohan Attal1, Burkhard Maess, Angela Friederici, Olivier David.   

Abstract

Cognitive functions involve not only cortical but also subcortical structures. Subcortical sources, however, contribute very little to magnetoencephalographic (MEG) and electroencephalographic (EEG) signals because they are far from external sensors and their neural architectonic organization often makes them electromagnetically silent. Estimating the activity of deep sources from MEG and EEG (M/EEG) data is thus a challenging issue. Here, we review the influence of geometric parameters (location/orientation) on M/EEG signals produced by the main deep brain structures (amygdalo-hippocampal complex, thalamus and some basal ganglia). We then discuss several methods that have been utilized to solve the issues and localize or quantify the M/EEG contribution from deep neural currents. These methods rely on realistic forward models of subcortical regions or on introducing strong dynamical priors on inverse solutions that are based on biologically plausible neural models, such as those used in dynamic causal modeling (DCM) for M/EEG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22718615     DOI: 10.1515/rns.2011.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Neurosci        ISSN: 0334-1763            Impact factor:   4.353


  27 in total

Review 1.  A review of recent literature employing electroencephalographic techniques to study the pathophysiology, phenomenology, and treatment response of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Gary Marcel Hasey; Michael Kiang
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  Cross-frequency power coupling between hierarchically organized face-selective areas.

Authors:  Nicholas Furl; Richard Coppola; Bruno B Averbeck; Daniel R Weinberger
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  A Rapid Subcortical Amygdala Route for Faces Irrespective of Spatial Frequency and Emotion.

Authors:  Jessica McFadyen; Martial Mermillod; Jason B Mattingley; Veronika Halász; Marta I Garrido
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Physiological Recordings of the Cerebellum in Movement Disorders.

Authors:  Ami Kumar; Chih-Chun Lin; Sheng-Han Kuo; Ming-Kai Pan
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 3.648

5.  Neurocomputational Underpinnings of Expected Surprise.

Authors:  Françoise Lecaignard; Olivier Bertrand; Anne Caclin; Jérémie Mattout
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 6.709

Review 6.  Structural and effective connectivity reveals potential network-based influences on category-sensitive visual areas.

Authors:  Nicholas Furl
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Assessment of subcortical source localization using deep brain activity imaging model with minimum norm operators: a MEG study.

Authors:  Yohan Attal; Denis Schwartz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  MEG reveals a fast pathway from somatosensory cortex to occipital areas via posterior parietal cortex in a blind subject.

Authors:  Andreas A Ioannides; Lichan Liu; Vahe Poghosyan; George A Saridis; Albert Gjedde; Maurice Ptito; Ron Kupers
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  MEG evidence for dynamic amygdala modulations by gaze and facial emotions.

Authors:  Thibaud Dumas; Stéphanie Dubal; Yohan Attal; Marie Chupin; Roland Jouvent; Shasha Morel; Nathalie George
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Subcortical amygdala pathways enable rapid face processing.

Authors:  Mona M Garvert; Karl J Friston; Raymond J Dolan; Marta I Garrido
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.