Regulatory B cells from hilar lymph nodes of tolerant mice in a murine model of allergic airway disease are CD5+, express TGF-β, and co-localize with CD4+Foxp3+ T cells.

In a biphasic, ovalbumin (OVA)-induced murine asthma model where allergic airway disease is followed by resolution and the development of local inhalational tolerance (LIT), transforming growth factor (TGF)-β-expressing CD5(+) B cells were selectively expanded locally in hilar lymph nodes (HLN) of LIT mice. LIT HLN CD5(+) B cells, but not LIT HLN CD5(-) B cells, induced expression of Foxp3 in CD4(+)CD25(-) T cells in vitro. These CD5(+) regulatory B cells (Breg) and CD4(+)Foxp3(+) T cells demonstrated similar increases in expression of chemokine receptors (CXCR4 and CXCR5) and co-localized in HLN B cell zones of LIT mice. The adoptive transfer of LIT HLN CD5(+) B cells, but not LIT HLN CD5(-) B cells, increased the number of CD4(+)Foxp3(+) T cells in the lung and inhibited airway eosinophilia in this OVA model. Thus, Breg in HLNs of LIT mice reside in a CD5(+) TGF-β-producing subpopulation and co-localize with CD4(+)Foxp3(+) T cells.

INTRODUCTION

Research over the last three decades has provided overwhelming evidence that asthma is an inflammatory disease of the airways orchestrated by T lymphocytes.[1,2] Activation of Th2 effector lymphocytes (Teff) causes elaboration of cytokines such as IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13, which in turn results in eosinophil activation and IgE production intrinsic to allergic inflammation.[3,4] The identification of regulatory T lymphocytes (Tregs) that can modulate Teff function has led to intensive research on their role in allergic asthma.[5-7] B lymphocytes have traditionally been viewed as target cells for Th2 cytokines, with IL-4 and IL-13 responsible for the initiation and maintenance of B cell IgE production.[8] However, emerging evidence suggests that there are also regulatory types of B cells (Bregs), which are specifically induced under inflammatory conditions[9-14] and which are capable of suppressing inflammation, enhancing recovery, or inducing tolerance.[15-17] Such Bregs have been implicated in the development of nasal tolerance to aeroallergens.[18] Like Tregs, Bregs may comprise several subpopulations that exhibit different mechanisms of immunomodulation, including production of anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10 or TGF-β1), function as inhibitory antigen presenting cells, and induction or recruitment of Tregs.[19,20]

We have recently identified a novel putative Breg that may be involved in the regulation of airway inflammation.[21] Acute aerosolized ovalbumin (OVA) exposure in sensitized mice induces typical allergic airway disease (AAD), but chronic inhalational antigen exposure results in resolution of the airway eosinophilia, Th2-cytokine secretion, and airway hyperreactivity[22-27] regardless of the persistence of OVA-specific IgE in serum and OVA-specific subcutaneous allergic reactions.[23,28] Reflecting the focal resolution of inflammation, we have termed this process local inhalational tolerance (LIT). Adoptive transfer of regional hilar lymph node (HLN) B cells from LIT mice to OVA-sensitized recipients increases the number of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Tregs in BAL and attenuates AAD following subsequent OVA aerosol exposure.[21] In contrast to AAD HLN B cells or LIT splenic B cells, LIT HLN B cells produce TGF-β and are capable of converting naïve CD4+CD25− T cells into functionally suppressive CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Foxp3+ Treg) in vitro.[21] These findings discovered a regulatory role for regional B cells in the attenuation of inflammation and re-establishment of homeostasis in the airway despite ongoing antigen challenge. The present study was undertaken to further establish the phenotype of these TGFβ-producing Bregs and to investigate their relationship to Tregs in respect to location in the HLN and in chemokine receptor expression.

RESULTS

CD5+ B cells were increased in the HLN at AAD and LIT

B cells isolated from inguinal lymph nodes and spleens were found to have an identical phenotype in both AAD and LIT mice: CD21intermIgDhi IgMintermCD5lo, consistent with mature follicular B cells. AAD HLN B cells had a similar phenotype to the cells in these systemic tissues, whereas LIT HLN had increased percentage of IgDlo and CD5hi cells as compared to AAD (Supplementary Figure S1). In hilar lymph nodes, there was a significant increase (p < 0.005) in the total number of CD5+ B cells in mice at AAD and LIT as compared to mice in the Naïve and Sensitized groups and to any of the groups in inguinal lymph nodes (Figure 1A). In the inguinal nodes, there were no significant differences in the total number of CD5+ B cells in mice at any of the stages (Figure 1A). Also in the HLN, there was a significant increase (p < 0.005) in the percentage CD5+ B cells in mice at LIT as compared to mice in the Naïve, Sensitized and AAD groups and to any of the groups in inguinal nodes (Figure 1B). In contrast, in the inguinal lymph nodes, there were no significant differences in the percentage of CD5+ B cells in mice at any of the stages (Figure 1B).

Figure 1

CD5+ B cells were increased in the HLN at AAD and LIT

Cells were isolated from hilar (black bars) and inguinal lymph nodes (grey bars) at different stages of the OVA model (Naïve, Sensitized, AAD and LIT). Panel A depicts flow cytometry dot plots from representative tissues, and panels B and C show mean ± SEM values for total number (B) and percentage of CD5+ B cells (C). Numbers of CD5+ B cells were significantly expanded in hilar nodes at AAD and LIT, and they remained elevated as a percentage of total B cells during LIT. In contrast, no changes were seen in the inguinal nodes. n = 8–12 in each group. ** indicates p < 0.005 as compared to naïve and sensitized groups in hilar nodes and to all groups in inguinal nodes (Panel B), or p < 0.005 as compared to all other groups (Panel C).

LIT HLN CD5+ B cells predominantly expressed TGF-β

The selective expansion of CD5+ B cells in HLNs from LIT mice suggested that these cells could constitute the suppressive Breg phenotype identified previously, where B lymphocytes isolated from HLNs of LIT mice induced CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T cells via expression of TGF-β.[21] Thus, we examined whether the LIT HLN TGFβ-producing B cells resided in the CD5+ or CD5− cell population. Minimal LAP expression was seen in CD5+ or CD5− cells isolated from spleens of Naïve or LIT mice (0.08–0.2% of these B cells were LAP+; Figure 2A and 2C). LAP was found at low levels in both types of B cells from HLN of Naïve mice. Its expression increased in both CD5+ and CD5− B cells in HLN from LIT mice, but the enhanced expression was much more dramatic in the CD5+ LIT HLN B cell population. In LIT HLNs, 37.9 ± 9% of CD5+ B cells were LAP+, as compared to 13.3 ± 4% of CD5− B cells (p< 0.05; Figure 2C). As anticipated, little IL-10 staining was seen in unstimulated B cells, but IL-10 production could be induced by 5-hour stimulation with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate and ionomycin.[29] As shown in Figures 2B and 2D, IL-10 was also primarily produced by CD5+ B cells (8.2 ± 1.3% in LIT HLN and 5.2 ± 0.7% in LIT spleen) as compared to CD5− B cells (1.0 ± 0.3% in LIT HLN and 0.6 ± 0.1% in LIT spleen; p < 0.0005 each). Unfortunately, the LAP staining was poor in these studies, possibly because of interference from the IL-10 staining conditions (e.g., permeabilization, low temperature), and so co-expression of IL-10 and TGF-β could not be directly assessed. However, in contrast to TGF-β, IL-10 production did not differ between LIT HLN and LIT spleen CD5+ B cells (p > 0.05), and in the HLNs, CD5+ B cell expression of IL-10 was significantly less than their expression of TGF-β (p < 0.005; Figure 2D).

Figure 2

LAP and IL-10 expression in CD5+ and CD5− B cells

Lymphocytes isolated from Spleens and HLN of Naïve and LIT mice were stained for B220, CD5, LAP, and IL-10, as described in the text. Panels A and B depict flow cytometry dot blots from representative tissues, and Panels C and D show mean ± SEM values for LAP expression (C) and IL-10 expression (D) in CD5+ (black bars) and CD5− B cells (gray bars). Panel C: Relative to Naïve animals, LAP expression was unchanged in spleen CD5+ and CD5− B cells of LIT mice, but LAP expression increased in HLN CD5+ and CD5− B cells at LIT. Panel D: IL-10 levels were increased in CD5+ B cells from both spleen and HLN compared to CD5− B cells, but there was no difference in expression between LIT spleen and LIT HLN. n = 4–5 mice per group for LAP and 6 mice per group for IL-10 staining. ** indicates p < 0.001 from other groups by ANOVA; † indicates p < 0.05 for CD5+ cells versus CD5− cells.

LIT HLN CD5+ B cells induced formation of Foxp3+ T cells in vitro, and adoptive transfer of LIT HLN CD5+ B cells increased airway Foxp3+ Tregs in sensitized recipient mice

We have previously demonstrated that LIT HLN B cells can induce Foxp3 expression in naïve T cells in vitro through a mechanism dependent on TGF-β and independent of IL-10.[21] To determine if the differential expression of LAP/TGF-β in CD5+ versus CD5− HLN B cells resulted in functional distinctions in the two subsets, CD19+ B cells that were isolated from HLNs of LIT mice were divided into CD5+ and CD5− populations, irradiated, and then co-cultured with naïve splenic CD4+CD25− T cells and anti-CD3/CD28. Foxp3+ expression by the T cells was increased 3-fold by LIT HLN CD5+ B cells relative to control stimulated conditions, but the LIT HLN CD5− B cells were without effect (Figure 3A). B cells were also required for the in vivo expansion of Foxp3+ Treg cells during LIT. In a first series of experiments, the progression of AAD to LIT was compared in wildtype mice and in B-cell-deficient JhD−/− mice (Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME). Wildtype mice showed regional expansion of Foxp3+ T cells during LIT, occurring in hilar but not inguinal lymph nodes (Figure 3B). This regional expansion did not occur in the JhD−/− mice (Figure 3B; p < 0.005 vs. wildtype mice). Next, adoptive transfer studies were performed with LIT HLN CD5+ B cells, LIT HLN CD5− B cells, and LIT Spleen CD5+ B cells. The number of airway Foxp3+ Tregs present in bronchoalveolar lavage of AAD mice increased by 43% in mice receiving LIT HLN CD5+ B cells (0.70 ± 0.1 × 105 cells) as compared to saline control mice (0.5 ± 0.1 × 105 cells) but was not affected by the adoptive transfer of LIT HLN CD5− B cells or LIT splenic CD5+ B cells (Figure 3C). Moreover, there was a direct correlation between the number of airway Foxp3+ Tregs and airway CD5+ B cells (r = 0.56; p < 0.005; Figure 3D). This correlation did not hold between airway Foxp3− Teff cells and CD5+ B cells in (r = 0.27; p = 0.20) or between airway Foxp3+ Tregs and CD5− B cells (r = 0.31; p = 0.14; data not shown).

Figure 3

In vitro and in vivo dependence of Foxp3+ Treg cells on CD5+ B cells

Panel A: CD4+CD25− T cells from spleens of naïve mice were co-cultured for 5 days without or with stimulation by soluble anti-CD3 and anti-CD28. Stimulated cells were also co-cultured with either irradiated CD19+CD5+ B cells or CD19+CD5− B cells from LIT HLNs. T cell Foxp3 expression was increased when cultured with LIT HLN CD5+ B cells versus with LIT CD5− B cells or anti-CD3/CD28 alone. Data represent mean ± SEM values of 3–4 animals per group; ** indicates p < 0.01 vs. other groups by ANOVA. Panel B: Foxp3+ Treg expression was compared in LIT control and JhD−/− mice. Control mice showed expansion of Foxp3+ Treg cells in hilar nodes (black bars) but not inguinal nodes (striped bars), but this local expansion did not occur in the JhD−/− mice. n = 5 mice per group; * indicates p < 0.005 between CRL and JhD−/− mice. Panel C: Two days before a week of daily OVA aerosol exposures, OVA-sensitized mice received tail vein injections of saline or specific B cell populations. Mice receiving LIT HLN CD5+ B cells demonstrated increased numbers of Foxp3+ T cells in their BAL, as compared to control (saline) mice or mice receiving LIT HLN CD5− B cells or LIT spleen CD5+ B cells. n = 5–11 mice per group; * indicates p < 0.05 vs. other groups by ANOVA. Panel D: For all groups of mice in panel C, there was a direct correlation between the number of CD4+Foxp3+ Treg cells and the number of CD19+CD5+ B cells in BAL (dashed line; r = 0.56; p < 0.005). This relationship also held for the LIT HLN CD5+ recipient animals alone (solid line; r = 0.73; p < 0.05). In contrast, there was no association between CD4+CD25+Foxp3− Teff cells and CD19+CD5+ B cells in BAL (r = 0.28; p > 0.10; data not shown).

Foxp3+ Tregs increased in the B cell zone and T cell - B cell border of hilar lymph nodes via confocal microscopy in mice at LIT

The expansion of airway and HLN Foxp3+ cells from AAD to LIT was associated with a striking difference in the distribution of Foxp3+ Tregs in HLNs, as demonstrated in representative confocal microscopy images in Figure 4A–4C. Qualitative observations of these confocal images showed apparent increases of Foxp3+ Tregs in HLN of mice at LIT (Figure 4A, lower panel) as compared to sensitized and AAD stages (Figure 4A, upper and middle panels). These observations were supported by quantification of Foxp3+ Tregs and B cells in different compartments of the HLN, which included T cell zone, T cell - B cell border (T-B border), and B cell zone (follicle). Representative images for the quantification strategy of Foxp3+ Tregs in the T-B border are shown in Figures 4B and 4C. In general, the B cell zones (follicular area) were reduced in size and number of cells in the HLN at LIT as compared to AAD, corresponding with the resolution of lung inflammation (Supplementary Table 1). There was a 78.3% increase (p < 0.05) in the density of Tregs (follicular Tregs) in the follicular B cell zone of HLN from mice at LIT as compared to AAD (Figure 4D), with no changes in Foxp3+ Treg densities in the T cell zone and T-B border. Moreover, in the T-B border and B cell zone, the ratios of Foxp3+ Tregs to B cells increased 184% and 146%, respectively, in HLN from mice at LIT as compared to AAD (Figure 4E; p < 0.05 each). Thus, Foxp3+ Tregs preferentially localized in the follicular area of the HLN at LIT. CD5 staining was not bright enough to permit specific identification of CD5+ B cells by confocal microscopy.

Figure 4

Increased Foxp3+ Tregs in the follicular area of the HLN in mice at LIT via confocal microscopy

Confocal microscopy was performed on HLNs from mice after sensitization (white bars), at AAD (grey bars), and at LIT (black bars) to determine the locations of B cells and CD4+Foxp3+Treg cells. Panels A–C: Representative confocal images of HLNs from sensitized (upper panels), AAD (middle panels), and LIT mice (lower panels), with quantification assessed using Imaris software as described in methods. Regions of appropriate dimensions were selected along the T-B border for quantification of Foxp3+ Tregs in that area (B). Foxp3+ Tregs were enhanced using the spots tool in Imaris Suite (C) and counted. Representative colors for confocal microscopy: green B220+ cells, blue CD4+ cells, and red Foxp3+ cells. Images of magnification 20x. Panels D–E: Mean ± SEM values for Foxp3+ Treg cell density (D) and the ratio of the number of Tregs to B cells (E) in the different HLN zones. n = 6–8 specimens per group; * indicates p < 0.05 as compared to sensitized and AAD in T-B border and B cell zone.

The number of CD5+ B cells and Foxp3+ Tregs expressing CXCR4 and CXCR5 were increased in the HLN at AAD and LIT

The co-localization of B cells and Foxp3+ T cells in HLNs suggested that the cells could be expressing similar chemokine receptors. Therefore, the expression of CXCR4 and CXCR5 on CD5+ B cells and Tregs was compared between hilar and inguinal lymph nodes and at various stages of the OVA model (Naïve, Sensitized, AAD and LIT). Significantly more CD5+ B cells expressed CXCR4 in hilar nodes versus inguinal nodes at each stage of the model (p < 0.05; Figure 5B), and this regional expression increased further at AAD and LIT as compared to Naïve and Sensitized stages (p < 0.05). Moreover, within hilar lymph nodes, expression of CXCR4+ was 2.3- to 3.5-fold higher on CD5+ B cells than on CD5− B cells at all stages of the model (Supplementary Figure S3). No changes were observed in the percentage of CXCR4+ CD5+ B cells in the inguinal lymph nodes except for a significant decrease at the Sensitized stage. There was no difference in the percentage of CD5+ B cells expressing CXCR5 at any of the stages in hilar or inguinal lymph nodes (Figure 5C). Like the percentages, the total number CD5+ B cells expressing CXCR4 was significantly increased in the HLN of mice at AAD and LIT as compared to mice at Naïve and Sensitized stages (Supplementary Figure S2A), and the total number of CD5+ B cells expressing CXCR5 was also increased at AAD and LIT (Supplementary Figure S2B). The number of CD5+ B cells expressing CXCR4 and CXCR5 was not altered in the inguinal lymph node at any of the stages (Supplementary Figure S2A and S2B).

Figure 5

Hilar lymph node CD5+ B cell expression of CXCR4 and CXCR5

CD5+ B cells were isolated from hilar nodes (black bars) and inguinal nodes (gray bars) at different stages (Naïve, Sensitized, AAD and LIT) of the OVA model. Panel A depicts representative flow cytometry dot plots of CXCR4 expression on CD19+CD5+ B cells. Panel B demonstrates increased CXCR4+CD5+ B cells in hilar compared to inguinal lymph nodes at all stages of the model, and expansion of hilar node CXCR4+CD5+ B cells during AAD and LIT. Panel C demonstrates similar CXCR5 expression by CD5+ B cells in both tissues and at all stages of the model. Data represent the mean ± SEM; n = 8–12 in each group (A, B); * indicates p < 0.05 as compared to Naïve and Sensitized groups in the HLN and to all groups in the ILN; ! indicates p < 0.05 as compared to all groups in the ILN; † indicates p < 0.05 between HLN and ILN in Naïve and Sensitized groups; †† indicates p < 0.005 between HLN and ILN in AAD and LIT groups.

The percentage (Figure 6B) and total number (Supplementary Figure S2C) of Foxp3+ Tregs expressing CXCR4 were also increased in the hilar nodes in mice at AAD and LIT, as compared to Naïve and Sensitized groups (p < 0.005), with no changes seen in inguinal nodes. In contrast to CD5+ B cells in the HLN, the percentage of Foxp3+ Tregs expressing CXCR5 was significantly increased in mice at AAD and LIT as compared to Naïve and Sensitized stages (p < 0.005; (Figure 6C). In inguinal nodes, the percentage of CXCR5+ Foxp3+ Tregs was not altered at any of the stages (Figure 6C). Similarly, the total number of Tregs expressing CXCR5 was significantly increased in HLNs of mice at AAD and LIT as compared to mice in Naïve and Sensitized stages (Supplementary Figure S2D). These data show that both CD5+ B cells and Foxp3+ Tregs up-regulate the expression of CXCR4 and CXCR5 at AAD and LIT specifically in hilar but not inguinal lymph nodes.

Figure 6

Hilar lymph node Foxp3+ T cell expression of CXCR4 and CXCR5

Foxp3+ T cells were isolated from hilar nodes (black bars) and inguinal nodes (gray bars) at different stages (Naïve, Sensitized, AAD and LIT) of the OVA model. Panel A depicts representative flow cytometry dot plots of CXCR4 and CXCR5 expression on CD4+Foxp3+ T cells. Panel B demonstrates increased CXCR4+Foxp3+ T cells in hilar compared to inguinal lymph nodes at AAD and LIT, and expansion of hilar node CXCR4+Foxp3+ T cells during AAD and LIT. Panel C demonstrates expansion of hilar node CXCR4+Foxp3+ B cells during AAD and LIT. Data represent the mean ± SEM; n = 4–8 in each group (A, B); ** indicates p < 0.005 as compared to Naïve and Sensitized groups in the HLN; †† indicates p < 0.005 between HLN and ILN in AAD and LIT groups.

Adoptive transfer of LIT HLN CD5+ B cells attenuated airway eosinophilia in sensitized recipient mice

The association between CD5+ B cells and Foxp3+ Tregs suggested that the regional HLN B cells responsible for the previously reported attenuation of AAD[21] resided in the CD5+ population. To test this, the degree of AAD was compared in animals receiving LIT HLN CD5+ B cells and animals receiving other cells. The development of airway eosinophilia was significantly reduced in mice that received LIT HLN CD5+ B cells (60.6 ± 2.0% and 17.2 ± 2.6 × 105 eosinophils) as compared to mice that received either vehicle alone, LIT HLN CD5− B cells or LIT spleen CD5+ B cells (Figure 8). Mice receiving LIT spleen CD5− B cells, naïve spleen CD5− B cells, or naïve spleen CD5+ B cells also developed similar airway eosinophilia as the control recipient animals (data not shown).

DISCUSSION

Previously we have shown that regional B cells isolated from hilar lymph nodes of LIT mice are capable of suppressing AAD in recipient animals.[21] B cells from LIT HLNs are unique in this function, as AAD suppression is not exerted by B cells isolated from AAD HLN or by splenic B cells of either AAD or LIT mice.[21] These LIT HLN Bregs induce Foxp3+ T cell generation through expression of TGF-β.[21] The present study further characterized these Bregs as a specific local CD19+B220+CD1dhiCD5+ B cell population expressing TGF-β and up-regulated expression of the chemokine receptor CXCR4.

The finding of CD5+ cells in LIT HLNs was distinctive, as there are very few reports of CD5+ cells in draining lymph nodes.[30] Their presence, in part, could be attributed to their expression of the chemokine receptors CXCR4 and CXCR5. The high level of CXCR5 expression by all the hilar and inguinal node B cells was consistent with its constituitive expression on circulating B cells, which directs their homing to B-cell follicles.[31,32] The upregulation of CXCR4 on HLN CD5+ B cells at AAD and LIT would direct their localization to germinal center dark zones, which are located adjacent to T-cell areas.[33] Further, the observation of increased expression of CXCR4 and CXCR5 on HLN Foxp3+ Tregs during AAD and LIT would facilitate their interaction with follicular B cells by placing Bregs and Foxp3+ Tregs in close proximity in the hilar nodes. Foxp3+ Treg cells are known to express CXCR4,[34] and so the increased numbers of CXCR4+Foxp3+ Treg cells in HLNs of AAD and LIT mice may have been due to enhanced migration of existing Foxp3+ Treg cells to the HLN. Alternately, the ability of LIT HLN CD5+ B cells to convert naïve CD4+ T cells to suppressive Foxp3+ Treg cells in vitro raises the intriguing possibility that this conversion may be occurring in vivo in the HLN follicles, initially during AAD to help limit the inflammatory response and continued at LIT to sustain the reestablished airway homeostasis. The confocal images support the close localization of these regulatory cells in the HLN especially in the T-B border, both qualitatively and quantitatively.

Other investigators have implicated a regulatory role for B-1a CD19+CD5+ cells in moderating allergic airway disease. In a cockroach allergen-induced asthma model, mice that are deficient in B-1a cells (CBA/CaHN-Btk/J mice) develop higher serum IgE levels and more airway inflammation than wildtype mice.[35] It should be noted, however, that Xid mice have several B-cell abnormalities, including impaired survival of follicular IgDhiIgMlo B cells and reduced numbers of marginal zone B cells.[36] Thus, potential abnormalities in other regulatory B cell populations in Xid mice could have accounted for their increased allergic airway disease. The IgDloCD5hi phenotype also suggested a B-1 rather than B-2 cell morphology in our subpopulation of LIT HLN B cells; however, all the cells were also B220+ (e.g., CD45Rhi), which is associated with B-2 cells. Thus, the expanded population of CD19+CD5+ cells in LIT HLNs had characteristics of both B-1 (IgDlo) and B-2 (B220+) subsets, and therefore may reflect a previously undefined Breg cell population that arose with chronic antigen exposure. Indeed, while CD5 expression is characteristic of B-1 cells, this surface marker can also be induced in B-2 cells by a variety of stimuli.[37] CD5 expression can be induced in human peripheral blood B cells by co-cultivation with T cells via CD40-CD40L interaction, and these CD5+ B cells have T-cell suppressive activity.[38] Since our LIT mice are chronically exposed to OVA for 6 weeks, the CD5+ cells seen in their HLN may represent induced expression of the marker by non-B-1 cells.

To date, most studies of regulatory B cells have focused on IL-10-producing B10 cells that reside in a CD19hiCD1dhiCD5+ B-cell population.[39,40] It has been shown that B10 cells expand in response to Schistosoma mansoni infections, and that the adoptive transfer of these B10 cells into allergen-sensitized mice suppresses anaphylaxis and AAD through IL-10–dependent mechanisms.[41,42] These B10 cells have a CD19+CD21hiCD23+IgD+IgMhiCD1dhi phenotype,[42] somewhat similar to our CD19+CD21intermIgDloIgMintermCD1dhi LIT HLN B cells. In the worm model, these suppressive B10 cells were found in the spleen. We found some expansion of CD5+ IL-10 producing B cells in the spleen and HLN in LIT mice (Figure 2D); however, these cells were ineffective at inhibiting AAD (Figure 7). In our LIT model, the suppressive Bregs arose only in regional HLNs, and no suppressive B cells were found in spleen or inguinal lymph node tissues. Moreover, the LIT hilar nodes contained 5-fold more TGF-β+ cells than IL-10+ cells (Figure 2). Of interest, CD19+ B cells from regional, mesenteric lymph nodes of mice with chronic enteric helminth infections are also capable of suppressing AAD through an IL-10–independent mechanism.[43] In addition, both IL-10 producing CD19+CD5+ B cells (B-10 cells) and TGFβ-producing CD19+CD5+ B cells have been shown to regulate cow’s milk allergic responses in human subjects.[44, 45] TGFβ-expressing B cells have also been shown to down-regulate pathogenic Th1 immunity in nonobese diabetic mice.[14] As with T cells, it is likely that several populations of regulatory B cells exist, and that different subsets may be preferentially generated based on the types of stimuli and anatomical sites of antigen presentation.

Figure 7

Attenuation of AAD by adoptive transfer of LIT HLN CD5+ B cells into sensitized recipient mice

OVA-sensitized mice received tail vein injections of saline or specific B cell populations (0.2 × 106 CD19+CD5+ or 1.0 × 106 CD19+CD5− cells) 2 days before a week of daily exposure to 1% OVA aerosols. Mice receiving the LIT HLN CD5+ B cells (solid bars) developed attenuated AAD, with less relative (Panel A) and absolute (Panel B) airway eosinophilia relative to control (saline) mice or mice receiving LIT HLN CD5− B cells or LIT spleen CD5+ B cells. Data represent mean ± SEM values of 5–11 mice per group; * indicates p < 0.05 vs. other groups by ANOVA.

Asthma is a complex disease. Its generation and resolution, pathogenesis and regulation are dependent upon intricate interactions between adaptive and innate immune cells. In animal models, antigen-induced AAD constitutes an unwanted and unnecessary Th2-driven inflammatory reaction against harmless inhaled antigens. LIT represents one process by which mice are able to suppress this detrimental inflammatory response and re-establish airway homeostasis despite ongoing systemic responses. It is apparent, both from basic science and clinical stand points, that no one cell type – effector or regulator – stands alone in this disease and is able to create or prevent asthma. Our studies have shown that LIT does not depend on the presence of either Bregs or Foxp3+ Tregs in knockout or antibody-depleted animals.[21,46] Although B-cell knockout animals develop LIT, they do so despite diminished levels of regional Foxp3+ Tregs. This finding supports the complex and interactive contributions of Bregs and Tregs in the development of tolerance in wildtype animals. Indeed, the contrasting pro- and anti-inflammatory roles of B and T cells are likely to overlap in asthma, with the balance of these opposing actions determining the natural course of the disease.

In summary, the present study identified a subpopulation of B cells that arose preferentially in regional lymphoid tissues in response to chronic antigen exposure and inflammation. These cells express a CD19+B220+CD21intermIgDloIgMinterm CD1dhiCD5+ phenotype, produce TGF-β, induce formation of regulatory Foxp3+ T cells in vitro, and suppress development of AAD in vivo via enhanced accumulation of Foxp3+ T cells in the airways. Further analysis of the genesis and function of these TGFβ-producing Bregs will help us understand how mice are capable of modulating their AAD and, thereby, yield potential insights into a cure for asthma.

METHODS

Ovalbumin animal model protocol

Female C57BL/6J mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). Animals were housed in the animal facility at the University of Connecticut Health Center and were treated in accordance with institutional and Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare guidelines. As previously described,[21-23] mice were immunized with 3 weekly intraperitoneal injections of 25 µg OVA in alum. One week after the last immunization, the mice are exposed to 1% aerosolized OVA in physiological saline, one hour/day for either 7 days (AAD) or 42 days (LIT), with an estimated inhaled daily dose of 30–40 µg/mouse.

Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL)/tissue analysis

At sacrifice, BAL fluid, hilar lymph nodes, inguinal lymph nodes, and spleens were harvested and processed for the isolation and enumeration of leukocytes. For collection of BAL, lungs were lavaged in situ with five 1.0 ml aliquots of sterile saline. Lymph nodes and spleens were harvested and mechanically disrupted into single-cell suspensions, with lysis of splenic erythrocytes by TAC solution (9 parts 0.83% w/v NH4Cl; 1 part 2.57% w/v Tris, pH 7.0). For all tissue samples, total nucleated cell counts were obtained using a hemocytometer with nigrosin dye exclusion as a measure of viability.

Antibodies and immunofluorescence reagents

The following monoclonal antibodies, either phycoerythrin (PE) or fluorescein isothiocyanate conjugated or unlabeled, were purchased from BD Pharmingen (San Diego, CA) and eBiosciences (San Diego, CA): CD3 (145-2C11), CD4 (RM4-5), CD5 (53-7.3), CD8 (53-6.72), CD19 (1D3), CD25 (PC61), B220 (RA3-6B2), CXCR4 (2B11), CXCR5 (2G8), Foxp3 (FJR-16s), IL-10 (JES5-16E3), IgD (11–26), and IgM (11/41). In addition, PE labeled anti-CD4 and anti-CD8 were purchased from Coulter Immunology (Marietta, GA). An anti-latency associated protein (LAP) of TGF-β was purchased from R & D Systems (Minneapolis, MN) and used to detect TGF-β bound to cells.

FACS analysis

Isolated lymphocytes were resuspended in PBS containing 0.2% BSA and 0.1% NaN3 at a concentration of 1 × 105 to 1 × 106 white blood cells/ml, and 100 µl of the cells were incubated with 100 µl of properly diluted mAb at 4° C for 30 min. For the identification of Foxp3+ Treg cells, cells stained with anti-CD3, anti-CD4, and anti-CD25 were permeabilized using fixation/ permeabilization buffer, following the manufacturer’s protocol, and stained using anti-Foxp3-allophycocyanin (FJK-16s) with corresponding isotype controls (eBioscience, San Diego, CA). After staining, the cells were washed twice with PBS containing 0.2% BSA and 0.1% NaN3 solution, and relative fluorescence intensities were measured on a 4-decade log scale by flow-cytometric analysis using a FACSCalibur or LSR II (Becton-Dickinson, San Diego, CA). For identification of CXCR4 and CXCR5 positive cells, cells were stained, incubated at 37° C for 45 minutes, washed in the above PBS solution, and samples were on Becton Dickinson LSR II.

For intracellular IL-10 staining, 1 × 106 cells from the Spleen or HLN were plated in a 96-well plate and treated with BD Golgi Plug® (BD Pharmigen). Cells were stimulated with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) (50 ng/ml; Sigma-Aldrich, Inc.) plus ionomycin (1 μg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich, Inc.) or left unstimulated for 5 hours at 37°C.[29] Cells were then stained for surface cell markers, treated with Cytofix/perm buffer (BD Pharmigen), and followed by intracellular cytokine staining with α-IL-10 at 4°C. After staining all samples were run on LSR II and analyzed with FlowJo, Tree Star Inc., software.

Mice at the various stages were sacrificed on different days and hence the gating strategy was kept consistent for all tissues at a particular stage. This is shown by different sized quadrants in the dot plots in Figures 1, 5, 6. Selective representative dot plots are presented in each figure.

Confocal Microscopy

HLN were cryopreserved in OCT, sectioned, and stained as described previously.[47] In brief, frozen sections of thickness 20 µm were fixed in acetone or glutaraldehyde, washed in ice cold PBS, and stained for 60 minutes at room temperature with a combination of fluorescently conjugated Abs (anti-B220, anti-CD4, anti-Foxp3) in 2% normal goat serum and 2% FCS/PBS solution. For consistency, the middle sections from each node were used for staining. To detect Foxp3 positive cells, the sections were prepared and permeabilized according to instructions in the Foxp3 staining kit (eBiosciences, CA). The sections were then Fc blocked (anti CD16/CD32), stained with Foxp3 overnight at 4° C, washed, mounted and analyzed by confocal microscopy.

For quantification of B220+ B cells and Foxp3+ Tregs, the spots tool in Imaris suite was used. B cell zones were selected using boxes along the entire area of B220+ cell clusters and T cell zones were selected boxes along the entire area based on the distribution of CD4+ cells. The T-B border of 100µm thickness (50µm into the B cell zone and 50µm into the T cell zone) was selected using approximately four boxes of appropriate length and width along the border of B cell zone. The four boxes represent the T-B cell border for one follicular image. For every mouse, 3–4 such follicular areas were imaged, and there were 2 mice per group. B220+ cells (green) and Foxp3+ cells (red) were enhanced, and the spots were counted to obtain the total number of each cell population. The ratios were then calculated from these numbers. To calculate the density values, X, Y and Z dimensions were obtained from regions selected based on distribution of T cell and B cells. The density was calculated using the formula = number of Tregs in a specific compartment/(X × Y × Z) of that compartment, with Units = µm−3

Treg cell induction assay

Freshly isolated CD4+CD25− Teff cells were obtained from spleens of Naïve mice using magnetic bead isolation (Miltenyi Biotech), with >95% purity. These Teff cells (1 × 106) were cocultured for 5 days with viable irradiated (2600 Rad) CD19+ CD5+ or CD5− B cells from HLNs of LIT mice (1 × 106; isolated as above), soluble anti-CD3 (1 µg/ml), and anti-CD28 (1 µg/ml). The cultures were in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FCS and 50 µM 2-ME in 24-well plates. After 5 days in culture, the cells were taken out from the wells, and the intracellular expression of Foxp3 was assessed on gated CD4+ T cells. All studies were performed in triplicate.

B cell isolation and adoptive transfers

B cells from HLNs and spleens of LIT mice were positively selected using a mouse CD19+ isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotech, Auburn, CA). The CD19+ cells were then separated by immunofluorescent labeling and subsequent isolation utilizing a FACS-Vantage sorter into CD5− and CD5+ subpopulations. Purified B cell subpopulations (0.2 × 106 CD19+CD5+ or 1.0 × 106 CD19+CD5− cells) were injected by tail vein into sensitized animals 2 days prior to 7 days of OVA aerosol exposures. Different numbers of CD19+CD5+ and CD19+CD5− cells were chosen for transfer to represent their relative proportions in the whole LN adoptive transfer studies.[21]

Statistical analysis

Data were expressed as mean ± standard error of mean values. Statistical comparisons between group means were made with ANOVA followed by Fisher’s protected least significant difference test between possible pair-wise combinations of means (StatView 4.5; Abacus Concepts or JMP7; SAS Institute). In all comparisons, p < 0.05 was used to determine statistical significance.