Literature DB >> 2271824

Ear wax removal: a survey of current practice.

J F Sharp1, J A Wilson, L Ross, R M Barr-Hamilton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the methods of removing ear wax used by local general practitioners and the incidence of associated complications.
DESIGN: Postal survey of 312 general practitioners serving a population of about 650,000; supplementary study of ear, nose, and throat outpatients to quantify the improvement in aural acuity after wax removal.
SETTING: Catchment area of the Edinburgh otolaryngological unit. PARTICIPANTS: 289 General practitioners who responded to the survey; 21 outpatients in the ear, nose, and throat department with occlusive wax.
RESULTS: 274 General practitioners removed wax by syringing, but only 53 (19%) always performed the procedure themselves; the remainder routinely delegated the task to practice nurses, some of whom had received no instruction. Ears were rarely examined again after the procedure. Complications had been experienced by 105 practitioners (38%) and included perforation, canal lacerations, and failure of wax removal. The removal of occlusive wax improved hearing by a mean of 5 dB over the frequencies analysed.
CONCLUSIONS: About 44,000 ears are syringed each year in the area and complications requiring specialist referral are estimated to occur in 1/1000 ears syringed. The incidence of complications could be reduced by a greater awareness of the potential hazards, increased instruction of personnel, and more careful selection of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2271824      PMCID: PMC1664378          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.301.6763.1251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  13 in total

1.  Managing cerumen impaction.

Authors:  A D Meyers
Journal:  Postgrad Med       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Earwax - and the right way to use an ear syringe.

Authors:  E H Burgess
Journal:  Nurs Times       Date:  1977-10-06

3.  'Silence in court': twenty-one years of otolaryngology litigation.

Authors:  A W Morrison
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.469

4.  A clinical comparison of triethanolamine polypeptide oleate-condensate ear drops with olive oil for the removal of impacted wax.

Authors:  D M Chaput de Saintonge; C I Johnstone
Journal:  Br J Clin Pract       Date:  1973-12

5.  The efficacy of wax solvents: in vitro studies and a clinical trial.

Authors:  J G Fraser
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1970-10       Impact factor: 1.469

6.  Solvents for ear wax.

Authors:  J I Horowitz
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1968-11-30

7.  Multicentre clinical trial of Exterol as a cerumenolytic.

Authors:  S Fahmy; M Whitefield
Journal:  Br J Clin Pract       Date:  1982-05

8.  Ear syringing.

Authors:  E R Seiler
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-05-24

9.  Ear wax removal: a survey of current practice.

Authors:  J F Sharp; J A Wilson; L Ross; R M Barr-Hamilton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-12-01

10.  Wax plugs and cotton buds.

Authors:  D W Sim
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 1.469

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Cerumen: its fascination and clinical importance: a review.

Authors:  H C Hanger; G P Mulley
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 2.  Ear wax.

Authors:  George G G Browning
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2008-01-25

Review 3.  [Complication rate of out-patient removal of ear wax: systematic review of the literature].

Authors:  G Schmiemann; C Kruschinski
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Ear wax removal.

Authors:  A J Drysdale
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-01-19

5.  Assessing the accuracy of tympanometric evaluation of external auditory canal volume: a scientific study using an ear canal model.

Authors:  A Al-Hussaini; D Owens; A Tomkinson
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 6.  Ear wax.

Authors:  Tony Wright
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2015-03-04

7.  Effectiveness of ear syringing in general practice: a randomised controlled trial and patients' experiences.

Authors:  David Memel; Carole Langley; Chris Watkins; Barbara Laue; Martin Birchall; Max Bachmann
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  An evaluation of a nurse-led ear care service in primary care: benefits and costs.

Authors:  M Fall; S Walters; S Read; M Deverill; M Lutman; P Milner; R Rodgers
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  A quasi-randomised controlled trial of water as a quick softening agent of persistent earwax in general practice.

Authors:  J A Eekhof; G H de Bock; S Le Cessie; M P Springer
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Direct hearing aid referral: the effect upon outpatient waiting times in a district general hospital.

Authors:  G C Fox; J F Sharp
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.