Literature DB >> 22717490

Alternative scoring for Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE).

Carlos Siordia1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies assessing physical functioning with the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) should be aware that the instrument may be age and culture insensitive.
OBJECTIVES: To asses "classical" PASE scoring in a sample of aged (mean age 74) Mexican origin Latinos in the Southwestern United States and provide a new scoring algorithm.
METHOD: Information from a cross sectional study of 2438 community-dwelling minority subjects who completed the PASE scale was scored with the classical and a new scoring approach to compare their similarity and predictive power on three items of functional ability.
RESULTS: The classical and new scoring procedures for PASE items render different total scores.
CONCLUSION: The classical approach for scoring PASE in aged minorities may fail to capture the age and culture insensitivity of the instrument. The new approach, or a derivation of it, should be used to compute the total PASE score for minority aged populations as further research continues.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22717490      PMCID: PMC3398236          DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Maturitas        ISSN: 0378-5122            Impact factor:   4.342


  11 in total

1.  Validity and reliability of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) in Japanese elderly people.

Authors:  Akiko Hagiwara; Naomi Ito; Kazuhiko Sawai; Keiko Kazuma
Journal:  Geriatr Gerontol Int       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.730

2.  The reliability, validity, and stability of a measure of physical activity in the elderly.

Authors:  G Kochersberger; E McConnell; M N Kuchibhatla; C Pieper
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  Validity of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE): according to energy expenditure assessed by the doubly labeled water method.

Authors:  A J Schuit; E G Schouten; K R Westerterp; W H Saris
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  The physical activity scale for the elderly (PASE): evidence for validity.

Authors:  R A Washburn; E McAuley; J Katula; S L Mihalko; R A Boileau
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Self-administered physical activity questionnaires for the elderly: a systematic review of measurement properties.

Authors:  Lisa Forsén; Nina Waaler Loland; Anne Vuillemin; Mai J M Chinapaw; Mireille N M van Poppel; Lidwine B Mokkink; Willem van Mechelen; Caroline B Terwee
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  The Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE): development and evaluation.

Authors:  R A Washburn; K W Smith; A M Jette; C A Janney
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE): the relationship with activity measured by a portable accelerometer.

Authors:  R A Washburn; J L Ficker
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.637

8.  Pedometer counts superior to physical activity scale for identifying health markers in older adults.

Authors:  B Ewald; M McEvoy; J Attia
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2008-07-14       Impact factor: 13.800

9.  Measures of physical ability are unrelated to objectively measured physical activity behavior in older adults residing in continuing care retirement communities.

Authors:  Kathryn R Zalewski; J Carson Smith; Jake Malzahn; Mark VanHart; Derek O'Connell
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Reliability and validity of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) in patients with hip osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Ida Svege; Elin Kolle; May Arna Risberg
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  3 in total

1.  An Optimal Self-Report Physical Activity Measure for Older Adults: Does Physical Function Matter?

Authors:  Nancy W Glynn; Alexa J Meinhardt; Kelsea R LaSorda; Jessica L Graves; Theresa Gmelin; Allison M Gerger; Paolo Caserotti; Robert M Boudreau
Journal:  J Aging Phys Act       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 2.109

2.  Social Support, General Self-Efficacy, Fear of Falling, and Physical Activity Among Older Adults in a Middle-Income Country.

Authors:  Emmanuel C Okoye; Ifeoma U Onwuakagba; Cynthia C Akile; Uchenna P Okonkwo; Christopher O Akosile; Ukamaka G Mgbeojedo; Taiwo J Oyewumi; Oluwaseun S Kubeyinje
Journal:  Gerontol Geriatr Med       Date:  2022-04-23

Review 3.  Self-Report Measures of Physical Activity.

Authors:  Emma L Healey; Kelli D Allen; Kim Bennell; Jocelyn L Bowden; Jonathan G Quicke; Robert Smith
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 5.178

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.