BACKGROUND:Nevirapine-based antiretroviral therapy is the predominant (and often the only) regimen available for children in resource-limited settings. Nevirapine resistance after exposure to the drug for prevention of maternal-to-child human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission is common, a problem that has led to the recommendation of ritonavir-boosted lopinavir in such settings. Regardless of whether there has been prior exposure to nevirapine, the performance of nevirapine versus ritonavir-boosted lopinavir in young children has not been rigorously established. METHODS: In a randomized trial conducted in six African countries and India, we compared the initiation of HIV treatment with zidovudine, lamivudine, and either nevirapine or ritonavir-boosted lopinavir in HIV-infected children 2 to 36 months of age who had no prior exposure tonevirapine. The primary end point was virologic failure or discontinuation of treatment by study week 24. RESULTS: A total of 288 children were enrolled; the median percentage of CD4+ T cells was 15%, and the median plasma HIV type 1 (HIV-1) RNA level was 5.7 log(10) copies per milliliter. The percentage of children who reached the primary end point was significantly higher in the nevirapine group than in the ritonavir-boosted lopinavir group (40.8% vs. 19.3%; P<0.001). Among the nevirapine-treated children with virologic failure for whom data on resistance were available, more than half (19 of 32) had resistance at the time of virologic failure. In addition, the time to a protocol-defined toxicity end point was shorter in the nevirapine group (P=0.04), as was the time to death (P=0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes were superior with ritonavir-boosted lopinavir among young children with no prior exposure to nevirapine. Factors that may have contributed to the suboptimal results with nevirapine include elevated viral load at baseline, selection for nevirapine resistance, background regimen of nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors, and the standard ramp-up dosing strategy. The results of this trial present policymakers with difficult choices. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and others; P1060 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00307151.).
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Nevirapine-based antiretroviral therapy is the predominant (and often the only) regimen available for children in resource-limited settings. Nevirapine resistance after exposure to the drug for prevention of maternal-to-childhuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission is common, a problem that has led to the recommendation of ritonavir-boosted lopinavir in such settings. Regardless of whether there has been prior exposure to nevirapine, the performance of nevirapine versus ritonavir-boosted lopinavir in young children has not been rigorously established. METHODS: In a randomized trial conducted in six African countries and India, we compared the initiation of HIV treatment with zidovudine, lamivudine, and either nevirapine or ritonavir-boosted lopinavir in HIV-infectedchildren 2 to 36 months of age who had no prior exposure to nevirapine. The primary end point was virologic failure or discontinuation of treatment by study week 24. RESULTS: A total of 288 children were enrolled; the median percentage of CD4+ T cells was 15%, and the median plasma HIV type 1 (HIV-1) RNA level was 5.7 log(10) copies per milliliter. The percentage of children who reached the primary end point was significantly higher in the nevirapine group than in the ritonavir-boosted lopinavir group (40.8% vs. 19.3%; P<0.001). Among the nevirapine-treated children with virologic failure for whom data on resistance were available, more than half (19 of 32) had resistance at the time of virologic failure. In addition, the time to a protocol-defined toxicity end point was shorter in the nevirapine group (P=0.04), as was the time to death (P=0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes were superior with ritonavir-boosted lopinavir among young children with no prior exposure to nevirapine. Factors that may have contributed to the suboptimal results with nevirapine include elevated viral load at baseline, selection for nevirapine resistance, background regimen of nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors, and the standard ramp-up dosing strategy. The results of this trial present policymakers with difficult choices. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and others; P1060 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00307151.).
Authors: Sharon A Nachman; Jane C Lindsey; Stephen Pelton; Lynne Mofenson; Kenneth McIntosh; Andrew Wiznia; Kenneth Stanley; Ram Yogev Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2002-05
Authors: V Mulenga; A Cook; A S Walker; D Kabamba; C Chijoka; A Ferrier; C Kalengo; C Kityo; C Kankasa; D Burger; M Thomason; C Chintu; D M Gibb Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2010-11-01 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Shahin Lockman; Michael D Hughes; James McIntyre; Yu Zheng; Tsungai Chipato; Francesca Conradie; Fred Sawe; Aida Asmelash; Mina C Hosseinipour; Lerato Mohapi; Elizabeth Stringer; Rosie Mngqibisa; Abraham Siika; Diana Atwine; James Hakim; Douglas Shaffer; Cecilia Kanyama; Kara Wools-Kaloustian; Robert A Salata; Evelyn Hogg; Beverly Alston-Smith; Ann Walawander; Eva Purcelle-Smith; Susan Eshleman; James Rooney; Sibtain Rahim; John W Mellors; Robert T Schooley; Judith S Currier Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-10-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Grace M Aldrovandi; Jane C Lindsey; Denise L Jacobson; Amanda Zadzilka; Elizabeth Sheeran; Jack Moye; Peggy Borum; William A Meyer; Dana S Hardin; Kathleen Mulligan Journal: AIDS Date: 2009-03-27 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: K Luzuriaga; H Wu; M McManus; P Britto; W Borkowsky; S Burchett; B Smith; L Mofenson; J L Sullivan Journal: J Virol Date: 1999-01 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Avy Violari; Mark F Cotton; Diana M Gibb; Abdel G Babiker; Jan Steyn; Shabir A Madhi; Patrick Jean-Philippe; James A McIntyre Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-11-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Luisa Salazar-Vizcaya; Olivia Keiser; Mary-Ann Davies; Andreas D Haas; Nello Blaser; Vivian Cox; Brian Eley; Helena Rabie; Harry Moultrie; Janet Giddy; Robin Wood; Matthias Egger; Janne Estill Journal: AIDS Date: 2014-10-23 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Claudia S Crowell; Almoustapha I Maiga; Mariam Sylla; Babafemi Taiwo; Niaboula Kone; Assaf P Oron; Robert L Murphy; Anne-Geneviève Marcelin; Ban Traore; Djeneba B Fofana; Gilles Peytavin; Ellen G Chadwick Journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 2.129
Authors: A Bamford; A Turkova; H Lyall; C Foster; N Klein; D Bastiaans; D Burger; S Bernadi; K Butler; E Chiappini; P Clayden; M Della Negra; V Giacomet; C Giaquinto; D Gibb; L Galli; M Hainaut; M Koros; L Marques; E Nastouli; T Niehues; A Noguera-Julian; P Rojo; C Rudin; H J Scherpbier; G Tudor-Williams; S B Welch Journal: HIV Med Date: 2015-02-03 Impact factor: 3.180
Authors: Jennifer Giandhari; Adriaan E Basson; Ashraf Coovadia; Louise Kuhn; Elaine J Abrams; Renate Strehlau; Lynn Morris; Gillian M Hunt Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2015-06-04 Impact factor: 2.205