Literature DB >> 22714892

Association between ocular dominance and spherical/astigmatic anisometropia, age, and sex: analysis of 1274 hyperopic individuals.

Stephan J Linke1, Julio Baviera, Gisbert Richard, Toam Katz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the association between ocular dominance and spherical/astigmatic anisometropia, age, and sex in hyperopic subjects.
METHODS: The medical records of 1274 hyperopic refractive surgery candidates were filtered. Ocular dominance was assessed with the hole-in-the-card test. Refractive error (manifest and cycloplegic) was measured in each subject and correlated to ocular dominance. Only subjects with corrected distance visual acuity of >20/22 in each eye were enrolled, to exclude amblyopia. Associations between ocular dominance and refractive state were analyzed by means of t-test, χ(2) test, Spearman correlation, and multivariate logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: Right and left eye ocular dominance was noted in 57.4 and 40.5% of the individuals. Nondominant eyes were more hyperopic (2.6 ± 1.27 diopters [D] vs. 2.35 ± 1.16 D; P < 0.001) and more astigmatic (-1.3 ± 1.3 D vs. -1.2 ± 1.2 D; P = 0.003) compared to dominant eyes. For spherical equivalent (SE) anisometropia of >2.5 D (n = 21), the nondominant eye was more hyperopic in 95.2% (SE 4.7 ± 1.4 D) compared to 4.8% (1.8 ± 0.94 D; P < 0.001) for the dominant eye being more hyperopic. For astigmatic anisometropia of >2.5 D (n = 27), the nondominant eye was more astigmatic in 89% (mean astigmatism -3.8 ± 1.1 D) compared to 11.1% (-1.4 ± 1.4 D; P < 0.001) for the dominant eye being more astigmatic.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study is the first to show that the nondominant eye has a greater degree of hyperopia and astigmatism than the dominant eye in hyperopic subjects. The prevalence of the nondominant eye being more hyperopic and more astigmatic increases with increasing anisometropia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22714892     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-8781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  6 in total

1.  The horizontal dark oculomotor rest position.

Authors:  Eun H Kim; Tara L Alvarez
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Comparing accommodative function between the dominant and non-dominant eye.

Authors:  Hamed Momeni-Moghaddam; Colm McAlinden; Abbas Azimi; Mina Sobhani; Eirini Skiadaresi
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 3.  The relationship between anisometropia and amblyopia.

Authors:  Brendan T Barrett; Arthur Bradley; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 21.198

4.  Association between Ocular Sensory Dominance and Refractive Error Asymmetry.

Authors:  Feng Jiang; Zheyi Chen; Hua Bi; Edgar Ekure; Binbin Su; Haoran Wu; Yifei Huang; Bin Zhang; Jun Jiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Elucidation of the more myopic eye in anisometropia: the interplay of laterality, ocular dominance, and anisometropic magnitude.

Authors:  Siyu Jiang; Zheyi Chen; Hua Bi; Ruijing Xia; Ting Shen; Ling Zhou; Jun Jiang; Bin Zhang; Fan Lu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Eyes of Aniso-Axial Length Individuals Share Generally Similar Corneal Biometrics with Normal Eyes in Cataract Population.

Authors:  Min Zhang; Tianhui Chen; Michael Deng; Jiahui Chen; Qinghe Jing; Yongxiang Jiang
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 1.909

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.