Literature DB >> 22711977

Decision making under time pressure, modeled in a prospect theory framework.

Diana L Young1, Adam S Goodie, Daniel B Hall, Eric Wu.   

Abstract

The current research examines the effects of time pressure on decision behavior based on a prospect theory framework. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants estimated certainty equivalents for binary gains-only bets in the presence or absence of time pressure. In Experiment 3, participants assessed comparable bets that were framed as losses. Data were modeled to establish psychological mechanisms underlying decision behavior. In Experiments 1 and 2, time pressure led to increased risk attractiveness, but no significant differences emerged in either probability discriminability or outcome utility. In Experiment 3, time pressure reduced probability discriminability, which was coupled with severe risk-seeking behavior for both conditions in the domain of losses. No significant effects of control over outcomes were observed. Results provide qualified support for theories that suggest increased risk-seeking for gains under time pressure.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22711977      PMCID: PMC3375992          DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Organ Behav Hum Decis Process        ISSN: 0749-5978


  8 in total

1.  On the shape of the probability weighting function.

Authors:  R Gonzalez; G Wu
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Experimental practices in economics: a methodological challenge for psychologists?

Authors:  R Hertwig; A Ortmann
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 12.579

3.  Modeling the Impact of Control on the Attractiveness of Risk in a Prospect Theory Framework.

Authors:  Diana L Young; Adam S Goodie; Daniel B Hall
Journal:  J Behav Decis Mak       Date:  2011-01

4.  The effects of control on betting: paradoxical betting on items of high confidence with low value.

Authors:  Adam S Goodie
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Information input overload and psychopathology.

Authors:  J G MILLER
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1960-02       Impact factor: 18.112

6.  Decision making under uncertainty: a comparison of simple scalability, fixed-sample, and sequential-sampling models.

Authors:  J R Busemeyer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 7.  Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment.

Authors:  J R Busemeyer; J T Townsend
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Artificial time constraints on the Iowa Gambling Task: the effects on behavioural performance and subjective experience.

Authors:  Caroline H Bowman; Cathryn E Y Evans; Oliver H Turnbull
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.310

  8 in total
  9 in total

Review 1.  Stress, Time Pressure, Strategy Selection and Math Anxiety in Mathematics: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Sara Caviola; Emma Carey; Irene C Mammarella; Denes Szucs
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-09-01

2.  Investigating Gender Differences under Time Pressure in Financial Risk Taking.

Authors:  Zhixin Xie; Lionel Page; Ben Hardy
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.558

3.  Time pressure changes how people explore and respond to uncertainty.

Authors:  Charley M Wu; Eric Schulz; Timothy J Pleskac; Maarten Speekenbrink
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Public health emergency decision-making and management system sound research using rough set attribute reduction and blockchain.

Authors:  Hanyi Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  The influence of ergodicity on risk affinity of timed and non-timed respondents.

Authors:  Arne Vanhoyweghen; Brecht Verbeken; Cathy Macharis; Vincent Ginis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  On the use of discrete-time quantum walks in decision theory.

Authors:  Ming Chen; Giuseppe M Ferro; Didier Sornette
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 3.752

7.  Acute stress affects risk taking but not ambiguity aversion.

Authors:  Magdalena Buckert; Christiane Schwieren; Brigitte M Kudielka; Christian J Fiebach
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  The BCD of response time analysis in experimental economics.

Authors:  Leonidas Spiliopoulos; Andreas Ortmann
Journal:  Exp Econ       Date:  2017-05-24

9.  The effect of fast and slow decisions on risk taking.

Authors:  Michael Kirchler; David Andersson; Caroline Bonn; Magnus Johannesson; Erik Ø Sørensen; Matthias Stefan; Gustav Tinghög; Daniel Västfjäll
Journal:  J Risk Uncertain       Date:  2017-06-07
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.