Literature DB >> 22711029

Too low to kill: concentration of the secondary metabolite ranunculin in buttercup pollen does not affect bee larval survival.

Claudio Sedivy1, Rafal Piskorski, Andreas Müller, Silvia Dorn.   

Abstract

Growing evidence suggests that the freely accessible pollen of some plants is chemically protected against pollen-feeding flower visitors. For example, a diet of pollen from buttercup plants (Ranunculus) recently was shown to have a deleterious effect on developing larvae of several bee species not specialized on Ranunculus. Numerous Ranunculus species contain ranunculin, the glucosyl hydrate form of the highly reactive and toxic lactone protoanemonin, that causes the toxicity of these plants. We tested whether the presence of ranunculin is responsible for the lethal effects of R. acris pollen on the larvae of two bee species that are not Ranunculus specialists. To investigate the effect on bee larval development, we added ranunculin to the pollen provisions of the Campanula specialist bee Chelostoma rapunculi and the Asteraceae specialist bee Heriades truncorum, and allowed the larvae to feed on these provisions. We quantified ranunculin in pollen of R. acris and in brood cell provisions collected by the Ranunculus specialist bee Chelostoma florisomne. We demonstrated that although ranunculin was lethal to both tested bee species in high concentrations, the concentration in the pollen of R. acris was at least fourfold lower than that tolerated by the larvae of C. rapunculi and H. truncorum in the feeding experiments. Ranunculin concentration in the brood cells of C. florisomne was on average even twentyfold lower than that in Ranunculus pollen, suggesting that a mechanism different from ranunculin intoxication accounts for the larval mortality reported for bees not specialized on Ranunculus pollen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22711029     DOI: 10.1007/s10886-012-0153-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  15 in total

1.  Anther evolution: pollen presentation strategies when pollinators differ.

Authors:  Maria Clara Castellanos; Paul Wilson; Sarah J Keller; Andrea D Wolfe; James D Thomson
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-12-12       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Patterns of host-plant choice in bees of the genus Chelostoma: the constraint hypothesis of host-range evolution in bees.

Authors:  Claudio Sedivy; Christophe J Praz; Andreas Müller; Alex Widmer; Silvia Dorn
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Ranunculin; the precursor of the vesicant substance of the buttercup.

Authors:  R HILL; R VAN HEYNINGEN
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1951-08       Impact factor: 3.857

4.  Can pollen headspace volatiles and pollenkitt lipids serve as reliable chemical cues for bee pollinators?

Authors:  Rafal Piskorski; Stefan Kroder; Silvia Dorn
Journal:  Chem Biodivers       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.408

5.  Insecticidal activity of Ranunculus sceleratus (L.) against Drosophila melanogaster and Tribolium castaneum.

Authors:  P R Bhattacharyya; S C Nath; D N Bordoloi
Journal:  Indian J Exp Biol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 0.818

6.  Chemical composition of anther volatiles in Ranunculaceae: genera-specific profiles in Anemone, Aquilegia, Caltha, Pulsatilla, Ranunculus, and Trollius species.

Authors:  Andreas Jürgens; Stefan Dötterl
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.844

7.  Specialized bees fail to develop on non-host pollen: do plants chemically protect their pollen?

Authors:  Christophe J Praz; Andreas Müller; Silvia Dorn
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.499

8.  In vitro activity of protoanemonin, an antifungal agent.

Authors:  M L Martín; L San Román; A Domínguez
Journal:  Planta Med       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Digestion of Pollen Components by Larvae of the Flower-Specialist Bee Chelostoma florisomne (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae).

Authors:  Y -S. Peng; H E.M. Dobson
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  1997-02-19       Impact factor: 2.354

10.  Antimicrobial activity of protoanemonin, a lactone from ranunculaceous plants.

Authors:  D Mares
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 2.574

View more
  6 in total

1.  Understanding pollen specialization in mason bees: a case study of six species.

Authors:  Megan K McAulay; Saff Z Killingsworth; Jessica R K Forrest
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Mechanisms in mutualisms: a chemically mediated thrips pollination strategy in common elder.

Authors:  Alison S Scott-Brown; Sarah E J Arnold; Geoffrey C Kite; Iain W Farrell; Dudley I Farman; Dominique W Collins; Philip C Stevenson
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 4.116

3.  The importance of pollen chemistry in evolutionary host shifts of bees.

Authors:  Maryse Vanderplanck; Nicolas J Vereecken; Laurent Grumiau; Fabiana Esposito; Georges Lognay; Ruddy Wattiez; Denis Michez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  A rare chemical burn due to Ranunculus arvensis: three case reports.

Authors:  Abdullah O Kocak; Murat Saritemur; Kenan Atac; Sibel Guclu; Ibrahim Ozlu
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.526

Review 5.  Poisonous Plants of the Indian Himalaya: An Overview.

Authors:  Abhishek Jamloki; Vijay Laxmi Trivedi; M C Nautiyal; Prabhakar Semwal; Natália Cruz-Martins
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2022-06-13

6.  Pollen defenses negatively impact foraging and fitness in a generalist bee (Bombus impatiens: Apidae).

Authors:  Kristen K Brochu; Maria T van Dyke; Nelson J Milano; Jessica D Petersen; Scott H McArt; Brian A Nault; André Kessler; Bryan N Danforth
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.