Literature DB >> 22710510

Vestibular schwannoma surgical volume and short-term outcomes in Maryland.

Bryan K Ward1, Christine G Gourin, Howard W Francis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize contemporary practice patterns and outcomes of vestibular schwannoma surgery.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis.
SETTING: Maryland Health Service Cost Review Commission database. PATIENTS: The study included patients who underwent surgery for vestibular schwannoma between 1990 and 2009. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Temporal trends and relationships between volume and in-hospital deaths, central nervous system (CNS) complications, length of hospitalization, and costs.
RESULTS: A total of 1177 surgical procedures were performed by 57 surgeons at 12 hospitals. Most cases were performed by high-volume surgeons (47%) at high-volume hospitals (79%). The number of cases increased from 474 in 1999-2000 to 703 in 2000-2009. Vestibular schwannoma surgery in 2000-2009 was associated with a decrease in CNS complications (odds ratio [OR] 0.4; P < .001) and an increase in cases performed by intermediate-volume (OR, 4.2; P = .002) and high-volume (OR, 3.2; P = .005) hospitals and intermediate-volume (OR, 1.9; P = .004) and high-volume (OR, 1.8; P = .006) surgeons. High-volume care was inversely related to the odds of urgent and emergent surgery (OR, 0.2; P < .001) and readmissions (OR, 0.1; P = .02). Surgeon volume accounted for 59% of the effect of hospital volume for urgent and emergent admissions and 20% for readmissions. After all other variables were controlled for, there was no significant association between hospital or surgeon volume and in-hospital mortality or CNS complications; however, surgery at high-volume hospitals was associated with significantly lower hospital-related costs (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest increased centralization of vestibular schwannoma surgery, with an increase in cases performed by intermediate- and high-volume providers and meaningful differences in high-volume surgical care that are mediated by surgeon volume and are associated with reduced hospital-related costs. Further investigation is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22710510     DOI: 10.1001/archoto.2012.877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0886-4470


  9 in total

1.  Association of Surgical and Hospital Volume and Patient Characteristics With 30-Day Readmission Rates.

Authors:  Gabriela Hernandez-Meza; Sean McKee; Daniel Carlton; Anthony Yang; Satish Govindaraj; Alfred Iloreta
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 6.223

2.  Transsphenoidal Resection of Pituitary Tumors in the United States, 2009 to 2011: Effects of Hospital Volume on Postoperative Complications.

Authors:  Daphne Li; Stephen Johans; Brendan Martin; Adrienne Cobb; Miri Kim; Anand V Germanwala
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2020-01-24

3.  The Influence of Hospital Volume on the Outcomes of Nasopharyngeal, Sinonasal, and Skull-Base Tumors: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Stephanie Flukes; Rahul K Sharma; Shivangi Lohia; Marc A Cohen
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-01-19

4.  Postoperative Complications and Readmission Rates Following Surgery for Cerebellopontine Angle Schwannomas.

Authors:  Hossein Mahboubi; Yarah M Haidar; Omid Moshtaghi; Kasra Ziai; Yaser Ghavami; Marlon Maducdoc; Harrison W Lin; Hamid R Djalilian
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  A Cross-sectional Survey of the North American Skull Base Society: Current Practice Patterns of Vestibular Schwannoma Evaluation and Management in North America.

Authors:  Matthew L Carlson; Jamie J Van Gompel; R Mark Wiet; Nicole M Tombers; Anand K Devaiah; Devyani Lal; Jacques J Morcos; Michael J Link
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2017-11-03

6.  Does where you live influence how your vestibular schwannoma is managed? Examining geographical differences in vestibular schwannoma treatment across the United States.

Authors:  Matthew L Carlson; Amy E Glasgow; Brandon R Grossardt; Elizabeth B Habermann; Michael J Link
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Does Hospital Volume Affect Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery?

Authors:  Jonathan L Hatch; Michael J Bauschard; Shaun A Nguyen; Paul R Lambert; Ted A Meyer; Theodore R McRackan
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  A clinicopathological study of peripheral schwannomas.

Authors:  Ankur Majumder; Arvind Ahuja; D S Chauhan; Purnima Paliwal; Minakshi Bhardwaj
Journal:  Med Pharm Rep       Date:  2021-04-29

9.  Surgery After Surgery for Vestibular Schwannoma: A Case Series.

Authors:  Łukasz Przepiórka; Przemysław Kunert; Wiktoria Rutkowska; Tomasz Dziedzic; Andrzej Marchel
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 6.244

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.