| Literature DB >> 22710359 |
Mina Kim1, Su-Geun Yang, Joon Mi Kim, Jin-Woo Lee, Young Soo Kim, Jung Il Lee.
Abstract
Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is characterized by hepatocellular injury and initial fibrosis severity has been suggested as an important prognostic factor of NASH. Silymarin was reported to improve carbon tetrachloride-induced liver fibrosis and reduce the activation of hepatic stellate cells (HSC). We investigated whether silymarin could suppress the activation of HSCs in NASH induced by methionine- and choline-deficient (MCD) diet fed to insulin-resistant rats. NASH was induced by feeding MCD diet to obese diabetic Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty (OLETF) rats. Non-diabetic Long-Evans Tokushima Otsuka (LETO) rats were fed with standard chow and served as the control. OLETF rats were fed on either standard laboratory chow, or MCD diet or MCD diet mixed with silymarin. Histological analysis of the liver showed improved non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) activity score in silymarin-fed MCD-induced NASH. Silymarin reduced the activation of HSCs, evaluated by counting α-smooth muscle actin (SMA)-positive cells and measuring α-SMA mRNA expression in the liver lysates as well as in HSCs isolated from the experimental animals. Although silymarin decreased α(1)-procollagen mRNA expression in isolated HSCs, the anti-fibrogenic effect of silymarin was not prominent so as to show significant difference under histological analysis. Silymarin increased the nuclear translocation of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) and decreased tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α mRNA expression in the liver. Our study suggested that the possible protective effect of silymarin in diet induced NASH by suppressing the activation of HSCs and disturbing the role of the inflammatory cytokine TNF-α.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22710359 PMCID: PMC3573753 DOI: 10.3892/ijmm.2012.1029
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Med ISSN: 1107-3756 Impact factor: 4.101
Changes in body and liver weight.
| Characteristic | LETO/vehicle LV | OLETF/vehicle OV | OLETF/MCD OM | OLETF/MCD+silymarin OMS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial body weight (g) | 530.23±13.79 | 633.58±30.24 | 595.95±33.82 | 577.29±72.70 |
| Final body weight (g) | 527.75±16.28 | 588.00±27.44 | 411.57±37.17[ | 427.80±31.64[ |
| Liver/final body weight (%) | 3.67±0.10 | 3.73±0.20 | 4.53±0.16[ | 4.30±0.26[ |
Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty (OLETF) rats, which have been established as animal model of obese type 2 diabetes, were fed with normal chow (vehicle) or methionine and choline-deficient (MCD) diet with or without silymarin for 8 weeks. Silymarin was mixed into the diet (0.5%, weight/weight). Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Otsuka (LETO) rats, which originated from the same colony as OLETF rats without diabetes, were fed with normal chow (vehicle) and served as control. Data are expressed as mean ± SD.
P<0.05 as compared with LETO/vehicle;
P<0.05, compared with OLETF/vehicle.
Figure 1.Cytosolic and nuclear Nrf2 protein expression in the liver. Cytosolic Nrf2 protein increased in the livers of MCD diet alone (OLETF/MCD) and MCD with silymarin fed (OLETF/MCD+silymarin) groups. However, only rats in OLETF/MCD+silymarin group had increased nuclear Nrf2.
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) activity score (NAS) of each experimental group assessed 8 weeks after the feeding with experimental diets.
| Characteristic | LETO/vehicle LV | OLETF/vehicle OV | OLETF/MCD OM | OLETF/MCD+Silymarin OMS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steatosis | 0.00±0.00 | 0.75±0.50 | 3.00±0.00 | 3.00±0.0 |
| Inflammation | 0.00±0.00 | 0.00±0.00 | 2.13±0.64 | 1.80±0.83 |
| Ballooning | 0.00±0.00 | 0.00±0.00 | 1.88±0.35 | 1.80±0.44 |
| NAS | 0.00±0.00 | 0.75±0.50 | 7.00±0.76[ | 6.00±0.70[ |
Pathological analysis of NAFLD and NAS was performed according to the suggestion by Kleiner et al (21). Data are expressed as mean ± SD.
P<0.05 as compared with LETO/vehicle;
P<0.05 for the OLETF/MCD vs. the OLETF/MCD+silymarin group.
Figure 2.Evaluation of liver fibrosis. (A) Histological analysis after Masson’s trichrome stain showed pericellular fibrosis in MCD fed OLETF rats (OLETF/MCD). Adding silymarin (OLETF/MCD+silymarin) could not completely block MCD induced fibrosis. (B) The OLETF/MCD group had increased α1-procollagen mRNA expression in the liver whereas that of rats in OLETF/MCD+silymarin tended to have reduced α1-procollagen mRNA. (C) Analysis of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) isolated from OLETF/MCD rats demonstrated increased α1-procollagen mRNA expression whereas HSCs from OLETF/MCD+silymarin had diminished α1-procollagen mRNA expression compared to that of OLETF/MCD. *P<0.05 compared to rats without diabetes fed with standard chow (LETO-vehicle). **P<0.05 compared to OLETF/MCD.
Figure 3.Evaluation of hepatic stellate cell (HSC) activation. (A) Immunohistochemical evaluation showed increased α-SMA positive cells in the liver of OLETF/MCD. The number decreased in OLETF/MCD+silymarin rats. Data are presented as the number of α-SMA positive cells in 30 40x fields (1.3 mm2, approximately 3,000 hepatocytes). (B) Analysis of α-SMA mRNA expression in the liver; the results are compatible to these of the immunohistochemical study. (C) Analysis of α-SMA mRNA expression in HSCs, isolated from the experimental animals; the results are in accordance with those of the whole liver study. *P<0.05 compared to LETO/vehicle. **P<0.05 compared to OLETF/MCD.
Figure 4.Changes in factors related to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). (A) OLETF/vehicle rats display TNF-α mRNA expression compatible to that of LETO/vehicle. OLETF/MCD rats show increased TNF-α mRNA expression, whereas OLETF/MCD+silymarin rats have significantly reduced TNF-α mRNA expression. (B) Activation of extracellular signal-related protein kinase (ERK) was evaluated by detecting phophorylated ERK1/2 protein in HSCs isolated from the experimental animals. (C) Expression of sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1c (SREBP-1c) mRNA increased in the liver of OLETF/MCD rats. Adding silymarin failed to reduce SREBP-1c mRNA expression (OLETF/MCD+silymarin). *P<0.05 compared to LETO/vehicle. **P<0.05 compared to OLETF/MCD.