Literature DB >> 22704461

Evaluation of the acute coronary syndrome safety profile of dabigatran etexilate in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery: findings from four Phase 3 trials.

Bengt I Eriksson1, John J Smith, Joseph Caprini, Stefan Hantel, Andreas Clemens, Martin Feuring, Janet Schnee, Gregory W Barsness.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Several anticoagulants have been associated with a 'rebound effect' that potentially increases the risk of thrombosis and cardiovascular events following discontinuation. Four Phase 3 trials of dabigatran etexilate in major orthopedic surgery incorporated measures to assess the risk of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) events during and after treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients in RE-MOBILIZE®, RE-MODEL™, RE-NOVATE®, and RENOVATE® II were randomized to dabigatran etexilate (150 mg or 220mg once daily) or enoxaparin for 6-35 days, and followed for up to 90 days. ACS data were tabulated from investigator-reported serious adverse events using ACS-specific Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Authorities (MedDRA) lower-level terms. To ensure that all ACS events were identified in the initial three studies, RE-MOBILIZE®, RE-MODEL™, and RE-NOVATE®, a broader list of MedDRA terms was prespecified that would trigger treatment-blinded adjudication.
RESULTS: When pooling the four trials, patients receiving dabigatran etexilate 220 mg had the fewest treatment-emergent, investigator-reported ACS events (6 [0.16%] vs 14 [0.51%] for dabigatran 150 mg and 13 [0.35%] for enoxaparin). Corresponding post-treatment rates were 2 (0.06%), 1 (0.04%), and 4 (0.11%). Similarly, treatment-emergent centrally adjudicated definite or likely ACS events in the first three trials were fewer in patients on dabigatran 220 mg (16 [0.60%]) than dabigatran 150 mg (26 [0.95%]) and enoxaparin (20 [0.74%]). The corresponding numbers post treatment were 2, 2, and 7. None of these between-group differences were statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: No increased ACS signal was detected with dabigatran etexilate compared with enoxaparin during or after treatment.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22704461     DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2012.05.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Res        ISSN: 0049-3848            Impact factor:   3.944


  7 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of central adjudication of outcomes and onsite outcome assessment on treatment effect estimates.

Authors:  Lee Aymar Ndounga Diakou; Ludovic Trinquart; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Caroline Barnes; Amelie Yavchitz; Philippe Ravaud; Isabelle Boutron
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-03-10

Review 2.  Dabigatran etexilate: a review of its use for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip or knee replacement surgery.

Authors:  Celeste B Burness; Kate McKeage
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Treatment of venous thromboembolism - effects of different therapeutic strategies on bleeding and recurrence rates and considerations for future anticoagulant management.

Authors:  Bastian Hass; Jayne Pooley; Adrian E Harrington; Andreas Clemens; Martin Feuring
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2012-12-31

4.  Dabigatran for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: answers to challenging "real-world" questions.

Authors:  Jorge Ferreira; Daniel Ferreira; Miguel Viana-Baptista; Paulo Bettencourt; Rui Cernadas; Francisco Crespo
Journal:  Thrombosis       Date:  2012-05-07

Review 5.  Cardiovascular outcomes during treatment with dabigatran: comprehensive analysis of individual subject data by treatment.

Authors:  Andreas Clemens; Mandy Fraessdorf; Jeffrey Friedman
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2013-10-11

6.  Dabigatran etexilate for thromboprophylaxis in over 5000 hip or knee replacement patients in a real-world clinical setting.

Authors:  Nadia Rosencher; Charles M Samama; Martin Feuring; Martina Brueckmann; Eva Kleine; Andreas Clemens; Simon Frostick
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2016-04-01

7.  Oral dabigatran etexilate versus enoxaparin for venous thromboembolism prevention after total hip arthroplasty: pooled analysis of two phase 3 randomized trials.

Authors:  Bengt I Eriksson; Ola E Dahl; Nadia Rosencher; Andreas Clemens; Stefan Hantel; Martin Feuring; Jörg Kreuzer; Michael Huo; Richard J Friedman
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2015-11-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.