Literature DB >> 22564134

Dabigatran etexilate: a review of its use for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip or knee replacement surgery.

Celeste B Burness1, Kate McKeage.   

Abstract

Dabigatran etexilate (Pradaxa®, Pradax™, Prazaxa®) is indicated for the primary prevention of venous thromboembolic (VTE) events in adults who have undergone elective total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR) surgery. This article reviews the clinical efficacy and tolerability of oral dabigatran etexilate in patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery, as well as summarizing its pharmacological properties and results of a cost-utility analysis. The discussion of clinical trial data focuses on comparative trials with the EU approved dosage regimen of once-daily subcutaneous enoxaparin sodium 40 mg. Dabigatran etexilate is an oral prodrug of the potent, rapidly acting, reversible, competitive inhibitor of thrombin, dabigatran. Dabigatran has predictable and consistent anticoagulant effects and does not require routine coagulation monitoring or dose titration. In the large, randomized, double-blind, phase III, noninferiority trials, RE-MODEL, RE-NOVATE and RE-NOVATE II, oral dabigatran etexilate, at dosages of 150 and 220 mg once daily, initiated postoperatively was shown to be noninferior to subcutaneous enoxaparin sodium 40 mg once daily (initiated prior to surgery) with regard to the incidence of the composite of total VTE events and all-cause mortality in patients undergoing TKR or THR surgery. In general, oral dabigatran etexilate was well tolerated in clinical trials of patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery. There were no significant between-group differences in bleeding complications, including major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding or minor bleeding between the dabigatran etexilate or enoxaparin sodium groups. In addition, a cost-utility analysis from the perspective of the UK National Health Service indicated that dabigatran etexilate 220 mg once daily is dominant (i.e. more effective and less costly) to enoxaparin sodium 40 mg once daily in patients undergoing THR or TKR. Additional head-to-head comparisons would be beneficial to more definitively position dabigatran etexilate relative to other available oral treatment options for VTE prophylaxis, such as rivaroxaban and apixaban. In the meantime, dabigatran etexilate offers a convenient, effective and generally well tolerated treatment option for the prophylaxis of VTE in patients undergoing TKR and THR surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22564134     DOI: 10.2165/11209080-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  45 in total

1.  Bleeding risk with dabigatran in the frail elderly.

Authors:  Paul Harper; Laura Young; Eileen Merriman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Dabigatran versus enoxaparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism after hip or knee arthroplasty: a pooled analysis of three trials.

Authors:  R J Friedman; O E Dahl; N Rosencher; J A Caprini; A A Kurth; C W Francis; A Clemens; S Hantel; J M Schnee; B I Eriksson
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 3.944

3.  Influence of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral dabigatran etexilate: an open-label, parallel-group, single-centre study.

Authors:  Joachim Stangier; Karin Rathgen; Hildegard Stähle; Dago Mazur
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Pharmacokinetic profile of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate in healthy volunteers and patients undergoing total hip replacement.

Authors:  Joachim Stangier; Bengt I Eriksson; Ola E Dahl; Lennart Ahnfelt; Gerhard Nehmiz; Hildegard Stähle; Karin Rathgen; Robbyna Svärd
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.126

5.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in Japanese and Caucasian subjects after oral administration of dabigatran etexilate.

Authors:  Sebastian Härtter; Norio Yamamura; Joachim Stangier; Paul A Reilly; Andreas Clemens
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 5.249

6.  Economic evaluation of dabigatran etexilate for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients aged over 75 years or with moderate renal impairment undergoing total knee or hip replacement.

Authors:  S E Wolowacz; N S Roskell; J M Plumb; A Clemens; H Noack; P A Robinson; G Dolan; I J Brenkel
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 5.249

Review 7.  A benefit-risk assessment of dabigatran in the prevention of venous thromboembolism in orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Sam Schulman; Ammar Majeed
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 8.  Thromboprophylaxis in patients older than 75 years or with moderate renal impairment undergoing knee or hip replacement surgery [corrected].

Authors:  Ola E Dahl; Andreas A Kurth; Nadia Rosencher; Herbert Noack; Andreas Clemens; Bengt I Eriksson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Efficacy and safety of dabigatran etexilate for the prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee arthroplasty. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sorrel E Wolowacz; Neil S Roskell; Jonathan M Plumb; Joseph A Caprini; Bengt I Eriksson
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.249

10.  The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and tolerability of dabigatran etexilate, a new oral direct thrombin inhibitor, in healthy male subjects.

Authors:  Joachim Stangier; Karin Rathgen; Hildegard Stähle; Dietmar Gansser; Willy Roth
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 4.335

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Dabigatran Etexilate: A Review in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Hannah A Blair; Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Venous thromboembolism due to suspected interaction between rivaroxaban and nevirapine.

Authors:  Duane Bates; Bruce Dalton; Janet Gilmour; Jeff Kapler
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2013-03

3.  Patient compliance with new oral anticoagulants after major orthopaedic surgery: rivaroxaban and dabigatran compared with subcutaneous injection of fondaparinux.

Authors:  Paolo DI Benedetto; Luigi Vetrugno; Dania DE Franceschi; Renato Gisonni; Araldo Causero; Giorgio Della Rocca
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2017-02-07

Review 4.  The expanding role of prodrugs in contemporary drug design and development.

Authors:  Jarkko Rautio; Nicholas A Meanwell; Li Di; Michael J Hageman
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 5.  Dabigatran etexilate: a review of its use in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism and prevention of venous thromboembolism recurrence.

Authors:  Sarah L Greig; Kate McKeage
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Recommendations for the emergency management of complications associated with the new direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), apixaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban.

Authors:  T Steiner; M Böhm; M Dichgans; H-C Diener; C Ell; M Endres; C Epple; M Grond; U Laufs; G Nickenig; H Riess; J Röther; P D Schellinger; M Spannagl; R Veltkamp
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 7.  The role of new oral anticoagulants in orthopaedics: an update of recent evidence.

Authors:  Dimitrios V Papadopoulos; Ioannis Kostas-Agnantis; Ioannis Gkiatas; Andreas G Tsantes; Panagiota Ziara; Anastasios V Korompilias
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-03-17

Review 8.  Dabigatran approaching the realm of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Authors:  Patricia J Ho; Juan A Siordia
Journal:  Blood Res       Date:  2016-06-23

9.  Predicted effect of ticagrelor on the pharmacokinetics of dabigatran etexilate using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling.

Authors:  Nan Wang; Lu Chen; Na Li; Gaoqi Xu; Fang Qi; Liqin Zhu; Wensheng Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.