| Literature DB >> 22703915 |
Keith Duffy1, Douglas Grossman.
Abstract
Since its description in the 1970s, the dysplastic nevus has been a source of confusion, and whether it represents a precursor to melanoma remains a controversial subject. Although a Consensus Conference in 1992 recommended that the term "dysplastic nevus" no longer be used, the histologic diagnosis continues to present a therapeutic quandary for dermatologists and other physicians, and there remains significant variation in clinical management. In part I of this continuing medical education review, we will discuss the historical origins of the term, the evidence for its distinct histologic basis, and its clinical significance.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22703915 PMCID: PMC3625372 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.02.047
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol ISSN: 0190-9622 Impact factor: 11.527