| Literature DB >> 22703519 |
Song Zhao1, Zhanyang Yu, Gang Zhao, Changhong Xing, Kazuhide Hayakawa, Michael J Whalen, Josephine M Lok, Eng H Lo, Xiaoying Wang.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that over-expression of Neuroglobin (Ngb) is neuroprotective against hypoxic/ischemic brain injuries. In this study we tested the neuroprotective effects of Ngb over-expression against traumatic brain injury (TBI) in mice.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22703519 PMCID: PMC3444402 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-13-67
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Neurosci ISSN: 1471-2202 Impact factor: 3.288
Figure 1 Ngb expression levels in mouse brains after TBI.A. Representative immunohistochemistry of Ngb protein expression in WT and Ngb-Tg mice cortex of peri-lesion area at sham animals and at 6 h after TBI. Original magnification × 200 in all photomicrographs. B. Representative western blot of Ngb protein expression in WT and Ngb-Tg mice cortex of peri-lesion area at sham animals and at 6 h after TBI, β-actin served as equal protein loading controls. C. Quantitation of Ngb protein levels. Data were expressed as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05, n = 5 per group.
Figure 2 Relative 3NT protein levels. Brian samples were collected at 6 h postinjury in sham and TBI-injured WT and Ngb-Tg mice. Slot-immunoblotting analysis was used to determine relative 3NT protein levels. Data were expressed as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05, n = 5 per group.
Sensorimotor Function Assessments
| Day 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.0 (4.8-5.0) | 4.7 (4.9-5.0) | 100 | 100 |
| Day 1 | 3.0 (2.0-3.5) | 5.0 (3.0-6.0) | 3.0 (2.2-3.7) | 3.0 (2.0-3.3) | 97.2 ± 6.67 | 95.5 ± 3.74 |
| Day 3 | 2.0 (1.0-2.5) | 2.0 (1.0-3.5) | 4.0 (2.7-4.3) | 2.7 (2.2-4.2) | 100.1 ± 6.02 | 97.5 ± 2.18 |
| Day 5 | 1.0 (1.0-2.0) | 2.0 (1.0-2.0) | 4.0 (3.3-4.7) | 4.0 (3.2-4.3) | 99.7 ± 6.81 | 98.5 ± 2.94 |
| Day 7 | 1.0 (1.0-2.0) | 1.0 (1.0-1.0) | 4.3 (4.2-4.7) | 4.0 (3.2-4.1) | 103.8 ± 6.96 | 97.8 ± 4.09 |
| Day 10 | 1.0 (1.0-2.0) | 0.0 (0.0-1.0) | 4.3 (4.0-4.8) | 4.0 (4.0-4.0) | 103.8 ± 6.96 | 97.8 ± 4.09 |
| Day 14 | 1.0 (1.0-1.0) | 0.0 (0.0-1.0) | 4.3 (4.0-4.8) | 4.0 (3.8-4.0) | 105.1 ± 6.74 | 99.4 ± 4.32 |
| Day 21 | 1.0 (0.0-1.0) | 1.0 (0.0-1.0) | 4.3 (4.1-5.0) | 4.0 (3.8-4.0) | 108.3 ± 7.48 | 109.5 ± 4.36 |
Sensorimotor deficits and body weight loss were assessed before (day 0) and at days 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 14, 21 after CCI. Results are expressed as median values and 25th to 75th percentiles for assessments of neurological score, hanging wire tests; and mean ± SD for assessments of body weight loss. N = 11 for Ngb-Tg and 15 for WT per group. In all assessments, there were no statistical significant differences between WT and Ngb-Tg groups.
Figure 3 Spatial memory acquisitions in WT and Ngb-Tg mice after TBI.A. Morris water maze latencies were measured on days 15-21 for hidden and visible platform trials after TBI. B. Morris water maze latencies were measured on days 15-21 for probe trials after TBI. Data were expressed as mean ± SD. n = 15 for WT and 11 for Ngb-Tg per group, respectively.
Figure 4 Measurements of cortical lesion volume in WT and Ngb-Tg mice.A. Representative photomicrographs of the traumatic lesions in H&E stained WT and Ngb-Tg mouse brain sections at 21 days after TBI. B. Traumatic brain lesion size. Data were expressed as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05, n = 15 for WT and 11 for Ngb-Tg per group, respectively.