Literature DB >> 22703190

Staging lymphadenectomy in renal cell carcinoma must be extended: a sensitivity curve analysis.

Umberto Capitanio1, Nazareno Suardi, Rayan Matloob, Firas Abdollah, Fabio Castiglione, Alberto Briganti, Cristina Carenzi, Marco Roscigno, Francesco Montorsi, Roberto Bertini.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: WHAT'S KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT? AND WHAT DOES THE STUDY ADD?: In renal cell carcinoma the role of lymphadenectomy (LND) is still controversial. Moreover, no firm consensus exists regarding the minimum number of lymph nodes that should be removed to obtain a satisfactory staging LND at the time of surgery. Our findings demonstrate that, when clinically indicated, staging LND in renal cell carcinoma should be extended. The removal of 15 lymph nodes might represent the lowest threshold to define a staging LND as adequate. More extended LND should be pursued if unfavourable clinical and pathological characteristics are evident at diagnosis and/or during surgery.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the staging of lymphadenectomy in renal cell carcinoma. No convincing data exist regarding the minimum number of lymph nodes that should be removed at the time of nephrectomy to ensure an accurate staging.
METHODS: Between 1987 and 2011, 850 patients with renal cell carcinoma underwent either partial or radical nephrectomy plus lymph node dissection (LND) at a single tertiary care institution (Tany N0-1Many ). Receiver operating characteristic curve coordinates were used to graph the probability of finding lymph node invasion according to the number of removed lymph nodes. Assuming that the likelihood of finding lymph node invasion according to the number of lymph nodes removed may be affected by patient characteristics, analyses were further stratified for clinical and pathological characteristics.
RESULTS: The rate of lymph node metastases strongly correlated with the clinical and pathological characteristics of the patients. Fifteen lymph nodes need to be removed to achieve a 90% probability of detecting at least one metastatic lymph node. Only slight differences were recorded after stratification for clinical nodal status, the presence of metastases at diagnosis and pathological T stage. Finally, 13, 16 and 21 lymph nodes need to be removed to achieve a 90% probability of detecting lymph node invasion, if present, in the low risk (score 0-1), intermediate risk (score 2-3) and high risk (score 4-5) Mayo Clinic classification, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The removal of 15 lymph nodes represents the lowest threshold for considering a staging LND as adequate. More extended LND should be pursued if unfavourable clinical and pathological characteristics are evident at diagnosis and/or during surgery.
© 2012 BJU International.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22703190     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11313.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  8 in total

1.  Kidney cancer: lymphadenectomy for RCC-how many nodes?

Authors:  Sarah Payton
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Development and external validation of a pathological nodal staging score for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Malte Rieken; Stephen A Boorjian; Luis A Kluth; Umberto Capitanio; Alberto Briganti; R Houston Thompson; Bradley C Leibovich; Laura-Maria Krabbe; Vitaly Margulis; Jay D Raman; Mikhail Regelman; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Morgan Rouprêt; Mohammad Abufaraj; Beat Foerster; Mithat Gönen; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Analysis of lymph node dissection in patients with ≥7-cm renal tumors.

Authors:  Michael A Feuerstein; Matthew Kent; Wassim M Bazzi; Melanie Bernstein; Paul Russo
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Revisiting the role of lymph node dissection in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Alice Yu; Dimitar V Zlatev; Michael L Blute
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-07

5.  Lymph node dissection during cytoreductive nephrectomy: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Michael A Feuerstein; Matthew Kent; Melanie Bernstein; Paul Russo
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 3.369

Review 6.  Management of inferior vena cava tumor thrombus in locally advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Sarah P Psutka; Bradley C Leibovich
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2015-08

Review 7.  Surgical Management of Advanced and Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Multidisciplinary Approach.

Authors:  Brian M Shinder; Kevin Rhee; Douglas Farrell; Nicholas J Farber; Mark N Stein; Thomas L Jang; Eric A Singer
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Diagnostic and Prognostic Significance of Radiologic Node-positive Renal Cell Carcinoma in the Absence of Distant Metastases: A Retrospective Analysis of Patients Undergoing Nephrectomy and Lymph Node Dissection.

Authors:  Hye Won Lee; Hwang Gyun Jeon; Byong Chang Jeong; Seong Il Seo; Seong Soo Jeon; Han Yong Choi; Hyun Moo Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 2.153

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.