Literature DB >> 22703030

Examination of the Moxus Modular Metabolic System by the Douglas-bag technique.

Jon Ingulf Medbø1, Asgeir Mamen, Fernando G Beltrami.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the performance of the Moxus Modular Metabolic System from AEI Technologies, Inc. using the Douglas-bag method as reference. To achieve this, eight moderately trained subjects cycled for 5 min at constant powers from 50 to 300 W in increments of 50 W. The O₂ uptake was measured simultaneously by both systems during the last minute of each stage. The O₂ uptake reported by the Moxus system was 83 ± 78 mL·min⁻¹ higher (mean ± SD; ≈3%, +62 µmol·s⁻¹, P < 0.001) than that reported by the Douglas-bag method; the bias varied by ≈2% between the subjects. The higher O₂ uptake of the Moxus system was a consequence of 1.4% ± 3.0% higher reported ventilation and 2% ± 3% higher reported O₂ extraction per volume of air breathed. The respiratory exchange ratio (R value) reported by the Moxus system rose proportionally to that of the Douglas-bag method and was 1% ± 2% higher for the range examined (0.75-1.10). Repeated tests of the maximal O₂ uptake showed a variability (coefficient of variation) of 2.5%. The study concluded that measurements by the Moxus system showed some bias and residual variation and, in addition, some systematic differences between the subjects in the O₂ uptake. The R value was reported quite accurately with moderate random error. Although there were some computer software and hardware instability problems that need to be solved, the Moxus system worked quite well and provided data more reliable than those of most commercial instruments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22703030     DOI: 10.1139/h2012-056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab        ISSN: 1715-5312            Impact factor:   2.665


  6 in total

1.  The Moxus Modular metabolic system evaluated with two sensors for ventilation against the Douglas bag method.

Authors:  Hans Rosdahl; Thomas Lindberg; Fredrik Edin; Johnny Nilsson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  HIIT is superior than MICT on cardiometabolic health during training and detraining.

Authors:  Fernando Gripp; Roberto Carlos Nava; Ricardo Cardoso Cassilhas; Elizabethe Adriana Esteves; Caíque Olegário Diniz Magalhães; Marco Fabrício Dias-Peixoto; Flávio de Castro Magalhães; Fabiano Trigueiro Amorim
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  The validity of the Moxus Modular metabolic system during incremental exercise tests: impacts on detection of small changes in oxygen consumption.

Authors:  Fernando G Beltrami; Christian Froyd; Asgeir Mamen; Timothy D Noakes
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  The Andersen aerobic fitness test: reliability and validity in 10-year-old children.

Authors:  Eivind Aadland; Torkil Terum; Asgeir Mamen; Lars Bo Andersen; Geir Kåre Resaland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Validity of sports watches when estimating energy expenditure during running.

Authors:  Lilian Roos; Wolfgang Taube; Nadja Beeler; Thomas Wyss
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-12-20

6.  Impact of catheterization on shear-mediated arterial dilation in healthy young men.

Authors:  Andrea Tryfonos; Matthew Cocks; Debar Rasoul; Joseph Mills; Daniel J Green; Ellen A Dawson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 3.078

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.