Literature DB >> 22702892

A prospective randomized controlled study comparing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion techniques for degenerative spondylolisthesis: unilateral pedicle screw and 1 cage versus bilateral pedicle screws and 2 cages.

Yasuchika Aoki1, Masatsune Yamagata, Yoshikazu Ikeda, Fumitake Nakajima, Seiji Ohtori, Koichi Nakagawa, Arata Nakajima, Tomoaki Toyone, Sumihisa Orita, Kazuhisa Takahashi.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Many surgeons currently prefer to use transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), placing 1 unilateral pedicle screw (PS) and 1 cage. However, no study has examined whether unilateral fixation improves surgical outcome. The authors conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial with a minimum 2-year follow-up to analyze TLIF outcomes for 2 techniques: placement of a unilateral PS and a cage compared with placement of bilateral PSs and 2 cages.
METHODS: Fifty patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis undergoing single-level TLIF were randomly assigned to receive either unilateral or bilateral fixation. Parameters compared between the groups were surgical invasiveness, severity of intermittent claudication, pre- and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores (from 0 to 10 for back pain, lower-extremity pain, and lower-extremity numbness), postoperative disability scores for lumbar spinal disorders (Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire [JOABPEQ]), and fusion rates.
RESULTS: The mean operative time for TLIF was significantly (p = 0.05) shorter and mean estimated blood loss was significantly lower in the unilateral than in the bilateral group. Intermittent claudication improved in response to each technique, but there was no significant intergroup difference. The unilateral group had a nonsignificant tendency toward less improvement in VAS score for back pain (1.5 vs 3.7 for the bilateral group) and exhibited significantly less improvement in VAS score for lower-extremity pain (2.1 vs 5.1, respectively) and numbness (1.7 vs 4.4). There were no significant differences between the groups in postsurgical scores for all 5 items of the JOABPEQ. The fusion rates were 87.5% (21 of 24 patients) in the unilateral group and 95.7% (22 of 23) in the bilateral group.
CONCLUSIONS: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion involving unilateral PS fixation and a single-cage technique is less invasive than a 2-cage technique and bilateral fixation, and it improved patients' symptoms. However, it resulted in less improvement in back pain, lower-extremity pain, and lower-extremity numbness. When considering unilateral PS fixation and a single cage, the surgeon should be aware of the potential limitations of this technique. Clinical trial registration no.: UMIN000007833 (UMIN).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22702892     DOI: 10.3171/2012.5.SPINE111044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  33 in total

1.  Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ying-Chao Han; Zhu-Qing Liu; Shan-Jin Wang; Li-Jun Li; Jun Tan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Clinical outcomes and sagittal alignment of single-level unilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with a 4 to 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Yun Liang; Weibin Shi; Chun Jiang; Zixian Chen; Fubing Liu; Zhenzhou Feng; Xiaoxing Jiang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wenbin Ding; Yile Chen; Hui Liu; Jianru Wang; Zhaomin Zheng
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Unilateral versus bilateral fixation for lumbar spinal fusion: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xi Lin; Chang-Peng Xu; Tao Yang; Qing-Shui Yin; Yu Zhang; Hong Xia
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-10-30

Review 5.  Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in short-segment lumbar spinal fusion: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Zengfeng Xin; Weixu Li
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  South Korean degenerative spondylolisthesis patients had surgical treatment at earlier age than Japanese, American, and European patients: a published literature observation.

Authors:  Zoltán Káplár; Yì-Xiáng J Wáng
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-12

7.  Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation with cage fusion in degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shan-Wen Xiao; Hua Jiang; Li-Jing Yang; Zeng-Ming Xiao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Comparative Analysis of Unilateral versus Bilateral Instrumentation in TLIF for Lumbar Degenerative Disorder: Single Center Large Series.

Authors:  Vigneshwara Badikillaya; Keyur K Akbari; Pramod Sudarshan; Hardik Suthar; Muralidharan Venkatesan; Sajan K Hegde
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-09-22

9.  Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Isthmic Versus Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Dustin H Massel; Benjamin C Mayo; Grant D Shifflett; Daniel D Bohl; Philip K Louie; Bryce A Basques; William W Long; Krishna D Modi; Fady Y Hijji; Ankur S Narain; Kern Singh
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-04-30

Review 10.  Set screw fracture with cage dislocation after two-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): a case report.

Authors:  Philip Johannes Felix Leute; Ahmed Hammad; Isabel Hoffmann; Sebastian Hoppe; Hans-Michael Klinger; Stefan Lakemeier
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2015-01-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.