Literature DB >> 22702402

Mitral isthmus ablation using steerable sheath and high ablation power: a single center experience.

Kelvin C K Wong1, Norman Qureshi, Michael Jones, Kim Rajappan, Yaver Bashir, Timothy R Betts.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mitral isthmus ablation is challenging. The use of steerable sheath and high ablation power may improve success rate.
METHODS: This single-center, prospective study enrolled 200 patients who underwent ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), including mitral isthmus ablation. Mitral isthmus ablation was performed using an irrigated ablation catheter via a steerable sheath (endocardium: maximum power: 40/50 W limited to annular end, maximum temperature: 48 °C; coronary sinus [CS]: maximum power: 25/30 W, maximum temperature: 48 °C). Endpoint was bidirectional mitral isthmus block.
RESULTS: Mitral isthmus block was acutely achieved in 182/200 patients (91%). Sixty-nine percent of patients required CS ablation. Mean total ablation time was 13 ± 6 minutes. There was 1 case of acute circumflex artery occlusion. Mean left atrium (LA) diameter was significantly bigger in patients with unsuccessful mitral isthmus ablation (49 ± 4 mm vs. 43 ± 6 mm; P = 0.0007). In redo procedures, the incidence of reconduction at the mitral isthmus, roof and cavotricuspid isthmus was 44%, 37%, and 29%, respectively. Overall incidence of perimitral flutter was 9%. Prior complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation was a predictor for microreentrant atrial tachycardia (AT) whereas gaps in linear lesions predicted macroreentrant flutters. After a mean follow-up of 20 ± 9 months, 73% of patients remained free from AF or AT.
CONCLUSION: We reported on a series of mitral isthmus ablation using steerable sheath and high ablation power (50 W). Larger LA diameter was a predictor of failure to achieve mitral isthmus block. The mitral isthmus had a moderately high incidence of re-conduction but was only associated with a relatively low incidence of perimitral flutter.
© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22702402     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2012.02380.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of contact force-guided procedure with non-contact force-guided procedure during left atrial mapping and pulmonary vein isolation: impact of contact force on recurrence of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Hisaki Makimoto; Christian-H Heeger; Tina Lin; Andreas Rillig; Andreas Metzner; Erik Wissner; Shibu Mathew; Sebastian Deiss; Peter Rausch; Christine Lemeš; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Feifan Ouyang; Roland Richard Tilz
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Impact of anteroinferior transseptal puncture on creation of a complete block at the mitral isthmus in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Kenji Okubo; Taishi Kuwahara; Masateru Takigawa; Yasuaki Tanaka; Jun Nakajima; Yuji Watari; Emiko Nakashima; Kazuya Yamao; Yuichiro Sagawa; Katsumasa Takagi; Tadashi Fujino; Hiroyuki Tsutsui; Atsushi Takahashi
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Bipolar radiofrequency catheter ablation for refractory perimitral flutter: a case report.

Authors:  Kenichiro Yamagata; Dan Wichterle; Petr Peichl; Bashar Aldhoon; Robert Čihák; Josef Kautzner
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.298

4.  Mitral isthmus ablation using a circular mapping catheter positioned in the left atrial appendage as a reference for conduction block.

Authors:  Takahiko Nishiyama; Takehiro Kimura; Taishi Fujisawa; Kazuaki Nakajima; Akira Kunitomi; Shin Kashimura; Yoshinori Katsumata; Nobuhiro Nishiyama; Yoshiyasu Aizawa; Keiichi Fukuda; Seiji Takatsuki
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-04-13

5.  Ablation of mitral annular flutter ablation utilizing a left atrial anterior line versus a lateral mitral isthmus line: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Omar M Aldaas; Florentino Lupercio; Andrew Y Lin; Frederick T Han; Kurt S Hoffmayer; Farshad Raissi; Gordon Ho; David Krummen; Gregory K Feld; Jonathan C Hsu
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 1.900

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.