Literature DB >> 22702389

Titanium cranioplasty and the prediction of complications.

Ciaran Scott Hill1, Astri Maria Valpuri Luoma, Sally R Wilson, Neil Kitchen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Titanium cranioplasty (TC), the operative repair of a skull defect with an ergonomically manufactured plate to restore cosmesis, cranial function and reduce complications is a common neurosurgical procedure. It is technically simple but has high complication rates. This study aimed to determine the incidence and predictors of complications following TC.
DESIGN: Retrospective review.
SUBJECTS: All patients undergoing TC over a 42-month period in our institution.
METHODS: Data was collected from the hospital database and case-notes. 3D CT reconstructions accurately measured defect size and location. Statistical analysis included correlation, independent variable analysis and descriptive methods.
RESULTS: A total of 95 TCs were analysed in 92 patients (3 cases of bifrontal cranioplasty). The commonest indications for TC were bony defect following removal of infected bone flap (n = 20), acute subdural haematoma (n = 18) and post-malignant infarction (n = 11). The commonest site was frontotemporoparietal (n = 61) and the overall complication rate was 30.4%. The commonest complication was infection and the overall removal rate was 8.4%. The mean cranioplasty area was 73.26 cm(2) (range 12.78-178.26 cm(2)). There was a significant relationship between area and length of post-operative hospital stay (p = 0.008, Pearson Rank). There was no significant relationship between area and complications, removal rates or infections. There was no relationship between age and total complications, post-operative hospital stay and infections. There was a non-significant trend for older patients to have their cranioplasty removed.
CONCLUSIONS: TC size is predictive of postoperative length of stay. However, the TC size is not predictive of complications or removal rate. Also, there was no association between interval since primary operation and complications. There was a non-significant trend for greater rates of TC removal in the elderly. There were no predictors of complications identified but they are common and patients should be consented accordingly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22702389     DOI: 10.3109/02688697.2012.692839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0268-8697            Impact factor:   1.596


  14 in total

1.  Calvaria critical-size defects in rats using piezoelectric equipment: a comparison with the classic trephine.

Authors:  R Senos; K D Hankenson
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 2.586

2.  Factors influencing the outcome (GOS) in reconstructive cranioplasty.

Authors:  U R Krause-Titz; N Warneke; S Freitag-Wolf; H Barth; H M Mehdorn
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  PTH promotes allograft integration in a calvarial bone defect.

Authors:  Dmitriy Sheyn; Doron Cohn Yakubovich; Ilan Kallai; Susan Su; Xiaoyu Da; Gadi Pelled; Wafa Tawackoli; Galen Cook-Weins; Edward M Schwarz; Dan Gazit; Zulma Gazit
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Reconstruction of Acquired Frontal Bone Defects Using Titanium Mesh Implants: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Chandrashekhar Chattopadhyay
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2018-01-22

5.  Management of infections complicating the orbitocranial approaches: Report of two cases and review of literature.

Authors:  Akash J Patel; Edward A M Duckworth
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2015-05-26

6.  Feasibility of the custom-made titanium cranioplasty CRANIOTOP(®).

Authors:  Julius Höhne; Alexander Brawanski; Holger G Gassner; Karl-Michael Schebesch
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2013-07-09

7.  Exposure of Titanium Mesh after Cranioplasty for Microvascular Decompression Surgery: Two Case Reports.

Authors:  Saiko Watanabe; Kenichi Amagasaki; Kazuaki Naemura; Hiroshi Nakaguchi
Journal:  NMC Case Rep J       Date:  2015-09-03

Review 8.  Decompressive craniectomy: past, present and future.

Authors:  Angelos G Kolias; Peter J Kirkpatrick; Peter J Hutchinson
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 42.937

9.  Mesenchymal stem cells and three-dimensional-osteoconductive scaffold regenerate calvarial bone in critical size defects in swine.

Authors:  Zoe M Johnson; Yuan Yuan; Xiangjia Li; Tea Jashashvili; Michael Jamieson; Mark Urata; Yong Chen; Yang Chai
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 6.940

10.  Bioceramic Implant Induces Bone Healing of Cranial Defects.

Authors:  Thomas Engstrand; Lars Kihlström; Kalle Lundgren; Margarita Trobos; Håkan Engqvist; Peter Thomsen
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-08-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.