Literature DB >> 22700854

Periprocedural bleeding and thromboembolic events with dabigatran compared with warfarin: results from the Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY) randomized trial.

Jeff S Healey1, John Eikelboom, James Douketis, Lars Wallentin, Jonas Oldgren, Sean Yang, Ellison Themeles, Hein Heidbuchel, Hein Heidbuchle, Alvaro Avezum, Paul Reilly, Stuart J Connolly, Salim Yusuf, Michael Ezekowitz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dabigatran reduces ischemic stroke in comparison with warfarin; however, given the lack of antidote, there is concern that it might increase bleeding when surgery or invasive procedures are required. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The current analysis was undertaken to compare the periprocedural bleeding risk of patients in the Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY) trial treated with dabigatran and warfarin. Bleeding rates were evaluated from 7 days before until 30 days after invasive procedures, considering only the first procedure for each patient. A total of 4591 patients underwent at least 1 invasive procedure: 24.7% of patients received dabigatran 110 mg, 25.4% received dabigatran 150 mg, and 25.9% received warfarin, P=0.34. Procedures included: pacemaker/defibrillator insertion (10.3%), dental procedures (10.0%), diagnostic procedures (10.0%), cataract removal (9.3%), colonoscopy (8.6%), and joint replacement (6.2%). Among patients assigned to either dabigatran dose, the last dose of study drug was given 49 (35-85) hours before the procedure on comparison with 114 (87-144) hours in patients receiving warfarin, P<0.001. There was no significant difference in the rates of periprocedural major bleeding between patients receiving dabigatran 110 mg (3.8%) or dabigatran 150 mg (5.1%) or warfarin (4.6%); dabigatran 110 mg versus warfarin: relative risk, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.17; P=0.28; dabigatran 150 mg versus warfarin: relative risk, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.49; P=0.58. Among patients having urgent surgery, major bleeding occurred in 17.8% with dabigatran 110 mg, 17.7% with dabigatran 150 mg, and 21.6% with warfarin: dabigatran 110 mg; relative risk, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.48 to 1.41; P=0.47; dabigatran 150 mg: relative risk, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.35; P=0.44.
CONCLUSIONS: Dabigatran and warfarin were associated with similar rates of periprocedural bleeding, including patients having urgent surgery. Dabigatran facilitated a shorter interruption of oral anticoagulation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00262600.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22700854     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.090464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  122 in total

1.  Approach to the new oral anticoagulants in family practice: part 2: addressing frequently asked questions.

Authors:  James Douketis; Alan David Bell; John Eikelboom; Aaron Liew
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Dabigatran for periprocedural anticoagulation following radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Benjamin A Steinberg; Vic Hasselblad; Brett D Atwater; Tristram D Bahnson; Jeffrey B Washam; John H Alexander; James P Daubert; Jonathan P Piccini
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Recommendations for the implementation of a Patient Blood Management programme. Application to elective major orthopaedic surgery in adults.

Authors:  Stefania Vaglio; Domenico Prisco; Gianni Biancofiore; Daniela Rafanelli; Paola Antonioli; Michele Lisanti; Lorenzo Andreani; Leonardo Basso; Claudio Velati; Giuliano Grazzini; Giancarlo M Liumbruno
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 4.  Role of the anticoagulant monitoring service in 2018: beyond warfarin.

Authors:  Nathan P Clark
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2018-11-30

5.  Patients Prescribed Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants Have Low Risk of Postpolypectomy Complications.

Authors:  Jessica X Yu; Melissa Oliver; Jody Lin; Matthew Chang; Berkeley N Limketkai; Roy Soetikno; Jay Bhattacharya; Tonya Kaltenbach
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 6.  Bleeding in patients receiving non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants: clinical trial evidence.

Authors:  Arthur Bracey; Wassim Shatila; James Wilson
Journal:  Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2018-09-30

7.  Outcomes of temporary interruption of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: results from the rivaroxaban once daily, oral, direct factor Xa inhibition compared with vitamin K antagonism for prevention of stroke and embolism trial in atrial fibrillation (ROCKET AF).

Authors:  Matthew W Sherwood; James D Douketis; Manesh R Patel; Jonathan P Piccini; Anne S Hellkamp; Yuliya Lokhnygina; Alex C Spyropoulos; Graeme J Hankey; Daniel E Singer; Christopher C Nessel; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Keith A A Fox; Robert M Califf; Richard C Becker
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 8.  A Bridge to Nowhere? Benefits and Risks for Periprocedural Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Arun Krishnamoorthy; Thomas Ortel
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 9.  Practical issues, limitations, and periprocedural management of the NOAC's.

Authors:  Gregory Connolly; Alex C Spyropoulos
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 10.  Why develop antidotes and reversal agents for non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants?

Authors:  Jeffrey B Washam; Jonathan P Piccini
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.