Literature DB >> 23532364

Practical issues, limitations, and periprocedural management of the NOAC's.

Gregory Connolly1, Alex C Spyropoulos.   

Abstract

The recent introduction of new oral anticoagulants or novel target specific oral anticoagulants (TSOA's) is likely to have a major impact in the years ahead. Many large clinical trials have been published in the past few years showing these agents are generally safe and effective in several clinical settings including acute venous thromboembolic disease, prophylaxis in the postoperative setting, prevention of thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation, and in the management of acute coronary syndromes. Reported rates of overall and intracranial bleeding are lower compared to oral vitamin K antagonists. Other major advantages of oral direct thrombin inhibitors (dabigatran) and Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban and apixaban) include rapid onset and offset of action and predictable pharmacodynamics with relatively wide therapeutic window allowing for unmonitored drug use. The relatively short half-life, rapid onset of action, and predictable pharmacokinetics should simplify periprocedural use of these agents. In this review we focus on some practical issues related to TSOA's including some limitations, potential complications, considerations to be made for certain patient populations, periprocedural management and issues pertaining to transition to and from these novel agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23532364     DOI: 10.1007/s11239-013-0911-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis        ISSN: 0929-5305            Impact factor:   2.300


  48 in total

1.  Rivaroxaban in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Jessica L Mega; Eugene Braunwald; Stephen D Wiviott; Jean-Pierre Bassand; Deepak L Bhatt; Christoph Bode; Paul Burton; Marc Cohen; Nancy Cook-Bruns; Keith A A Fox; Shinya Goto; Sabina A Murphy; Alexei N Plotnikov; David Schneider; Xiang Sun; Freek W A Verheugt; C Michael Gibson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-11-13       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Apixaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in medically ill patients.

Authors:  Samuel Z Goldhaber; Alain Leizorovicz; Ajay K Kakkar; Sylvia K Haas; Geno Merli; Robert M Knabb; Jeffrey I Weitz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-11-13       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Cost-effectiveness of dabigatran compared with warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  James V Freeman; Ruo P Zhu; Douglas K Owens; Alan M Garber; David W Hutton; Alan S Go; Paul J Wang; Mintu P Turakhia
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Apixaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after hip replacement.

Authors:  Michael Rud Lassen; Alexander Gallus; Gary E Raskob; Graham Pineo; Dalei Chen; Luz Margarita Ramirez
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Potential inaccuracy of point-of-care INR in dabigatran-treated patients.

Authors:  Lawrence Baruch; Olga Sherman
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 6.  A benefit-risk assessment of dabigatran in the prevention of venous thromboembolism in orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Sam Schulman; Ammar Majeed
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 7.  Cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for the prevention of postsurgical venous thromboembolism in Canada.

Authors:  Alexander Diamantopoulos; Michael Lees; Philip S Wells; Fiona Forster; Jaithri Ananthapavan; Heather McDonald
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 5.249

Review 8.  Epidemiology and management of bleeding in patients using vitamin K antagonists.

Authors:  M Levi
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.824

9.  Apixaban or enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after knee replacement.

Authors:  Michael Rud Lassen; Gary E Raskob; Alexander Gallus; Graham Pineo; Dalei Chen; Ronald J Portman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  In vitro metabolism of rivaroxaban, an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor, in liver microsomes and hepatocytes of rats, dogs, and humans.

Authors:  D Lang; C Freudenberger; C Weinz
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 3.922

View more
  6 in total

1.  Urgent monitoring of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation: a tentative approach based on routine laboratory tests.

Authors:  Giuseppe Lippi; Diego Ardissino; Roberto Quintavalla; Gianfranco Cervellin
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 2.  Using new oral anticoagulants in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  Anne R Bass
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.592

3.  Acquired hemophilia with inhibitors presenting as an emergency: misinterpretation of clotting results during direct oral anticoagulation.

Authors:  Ariane Sümnig; Anne Grotevendt; Antje Westphal; Michael Fiene; Andreas Greinacher; Thomas Thiele
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Pharmacoepidemiologic study of warfarin prescription in a Brazilian tertiary hospital.

Authors:  Camilo Molino Guidoni; Paulo Roque Obreli-Neto; Leonardo Regis Leira Pereira
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 5.  An updated review of target-specific oral anticoagulants used in stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation, venous thromboembolic disease, and acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Christina L Cove; Elaine M Hylek
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 6.  New Anticoagulants for the Prevention and Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism.

Authors:  Joo Hee Kim; Kyung-Min Lim; Hye Sun Gwak
Journal:  Biomol Ther (Seoul)       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.634

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.