A Jakab1, R Blanc, E L Berényi, G Székely. 1. Computer Vision Laboratory, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zürich, Switzerland. jakaba@med.unideb.hu
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Neurosurgical interventions of the thalamus rely on transferring stereotactic coordinates from an atlas onto the patient's MR brain images. We propose a prototype application for performing thalamus target map individualization by fusing patient-specific thalamus geometric information and diffusion tensor tractography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Previously, our workgroup developed a thalamus atlas by fusing anatomic information from 7 histologically processed thalami. Thalamocortical connectivity maps were generated from DTI scans of 40 subjects by using a previously described procedure and were mapped to a standard neuroimaging space. These data were merged into a statistical shape model describing the morphologic variability of the thalamic outline, nuclei, and connectivity landmarks. This model was used to deform the atlas to individual images. Postmortem MR imaging scans were used to quantify the accuracy of nuclei predictions. RESULTS: Reliable tractography-based markers were located in the ventral lateral thalamus, with the somatosensory connections coinciding with the VPLa and VPLp nuclei; and motor/premotor connections, with the VLpv and VLa nuclei. Prediction accuracy of thalamus outlines was higher with the SSM approach than the ACPC alignment of data (0.56 mm versus 1.24; Dice overlap: 0.87 versus 0.7); for individual nuclei: 0.65 mm, Dice: 0.63 (SSM); 1.24 mm, Dice: 0.4 (ACPC). CONCLUSIONS: Previous studies have already applied DTI to the thalamus. As a further step in this direction, we demonstrate a hybrid approach by using statistical shape models, which have the potential to cope with intersubject variations in individual thalamus geometry.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Neurosurgical interventions of the thalamus rely on transferring stereotactic coordinates from an atlas onto the patient's MR brain images. We propose a prototype application for performing thalamus target map individualization by fusing patient-specific thalamus geometric information and diffusion tensor tractography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Previously, our workgroup developed a thalamus atlas by fusing anatomic information from 7 histologically processed thalami. Thalamocortical connectivity maps were generated from DTI scans of 40 subjects by using a previously described procedure and were mapped to a standard neuroimaging space. These data were merged into a statistical shape model describing the morphologic variability of the thalamic outline, nuclei, and connectivity landmarks. This model was used to deform the atlas to individual images. Postmortem MR imaging scans were used to quantify the accuracy of nuclei predictions. RESULTS: Reliable tractography-based markers were located in the ventral lateral thalamus, with the somatosensory connections coinciding with the VPLa and VPLp nuclei; and motor/premotor connections, with the VLpv and VLa nuclei. Prediction accuracy of thalamus outlines was higher with the SSM approach than the ACPC alignment of data (0.56 mm versus 1.24; Dice overlap: 0.87 versus 0.7); for individual nuclei: 0.65 mm, Dice: 0.63 (SSM); 1.24 mm, Dice: 0.4 (ACPC). CONCLUSIONS: Previous studies have already applied DTI to the thalamus. As a further step in this direction, we demonstrate a hybrid approach by using statistical shape models, which have the potential to cope with intersubject variations in individual thalamus geometry.
Authors: T E J Behrens; H Johansen-Berg; M W Woolrich; S M Smith; C A M Wheeler-Kingshott; P A Boulby; G J Barker; E L Sillery; K Sheehan; O Ciccarelli; A J Thompson; J M Brady; P M Matthews Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2004 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Dongyang Zhang; Abraham Z Snyder; Joshua S Shimony; Michael D Fox; Marcus E Raichle Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2009-09-03 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Catherine R Traynor; Gareth J Barker; William R Crum; Steve C R Williams; Mark P Richardson Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2011-02-17 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Axel Krauth; Remi Blanc; Alejandra Poveda; Daniel Jeanmonod; Anne Morel; Gábor Székely Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2009-10-21 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: J T Devlin; E L Sillery; D A Hall; P Hobden; T E J Behrens; R G Nunes; S Clare; P M Matthews; D R Moore; H Johansen-Berg Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2006-02-09 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Hannes O Tiedt; Felicitas Ehlen; Lea K Krugel; Andreas Horn; Andrea A Kühn; Fabian Klostermann Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2016-09-20 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Mohammad S Majdi; Mahesh B Keerthivasan; Brian K Rutt; Natalie M Zahr; Jeffrey J Rodriguez; Manojkumar Saranathan Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2020-08-21 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Andreas Horn; Ningfei Li; Till A Dembek; Ari Kappel; Chadwick Boulay; Siobhan Ewert; Anna Tietze; Andreas Husch; Thushara Perera; Wolf-Julian Neumann; Marco Reisert; Hang Si; Robert Oostenveld; Christopher Rorden; Fang-Cheng Yeh; Qianqian Fang; Todd M Herrington; Johannes Vorwerk; Andrea A Kühn Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Benjamin A Ely; Junqian Xu; Wayne K Goodman; Kyle A Lapidus; Vilma Gabbay; Emily R Stern Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2016-03-16 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Fatimah M Albazron; Joel Bruss; Robin M Jones; Torunn I Yock; Margaret B Pulsifer; Alexander L Cohen; Peg C Nopoulos; Annah N Abrams; Mariko Sato; Aaron D Boes Journal: Neurology Date: 2019-09-16 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Wolf-Julian Neumann; Franziska Staub-Bartelt; Andreas Horn; Julia Schanda; Gerd-Helge Schneider; Peter Brown; Andrea A Kühn Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2017-09-20 Impact factor: 3.708