A Murphy1, S P Symons, J Hopyan, R I Aviv. 1. Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. amanda.murphy@live.ca
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recanalization may not result in better clinical outcomes after ischemic stroke. We determined the incidence and significant predictors of CMR, defined as CT angiographic recanalization and a good clinical outcome, after IV-rtPA in acute ischemic stroke. A CMR score was devised and tested. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-six consecutive patients with anterior circulation ischemic stroke receiving IV-rtPA were retrospectively reviewed. Imaging included a baseline NCCT and CTA. Recanalization was assessed on a 24-hour CTA. Clinical outcome was determined by the 90-day mRS. CMR was defined as CTA recanalization and a good clinical outcome (mRS ≤2). Logistic regression analysis determined predictors of CMR. The predictive ability of a CMR score was tested with AIC. RESULTS: CMR occurred in 29% (36/126). Patients with CMR had fewer neurologic deficits (P = .001) and higher ASPECTS (P = .041) at baseline than those without CMR. Baseline NIHSS score did not predict proximal occlusion (OR 0.959; 95% CI [0.907-1.014]; P = .141). Multivariate analysis showed admission NIHSS score (P = .001) and the site of vessel occlusion (P = .022) to be significant CMR predictors. CMR was significantly less likely in patients with proximal occlusions (ICA, P = .005; proximal M1, P = .021). A CMR score better predicted CMR than either NIHSS or vessel occlusion site alone (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Milder baseline stroke deficit and distal vessel occlusion are significant predictors of CMR. A combination of these parameters better predicts CMR than either parameter alone.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recanalization may not result in better clinical outcomes after ischemic stroke. We determined the incidence and significant predictors of CMR, defined as CT angiographic recanalization and a good clinical outcome, after IV-rtPA in acute ischemic stroke. A CMR score was devised and tested. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-six consecutive patients with anterior circulation ischemic stroke receiving IV-rtPA were retrospectively reviewed. Imaging included a baseline NCCT and CTA. Recanalization was assessed on a 24-hour CTA. Clinical outcome was determined by the 90-day mRS. CMR was defined as CTA recanalization and a good clinical outcome (mRS ≤2). Logistic regression analysis determined predictors of CMR. The predictive ability of a CMR score was tested with AIC. RESULTS: CMR occurred in 29% (36/126). Patients with CMR had fewer neurologic deficits (P = .001) and higher ASPECTS (P = .041) at baseline than those without CMR. Baseline NIHSS score did not predict proximal occlusion (OR 0.959; 95% CI [0.907-1.014]; P = .141). Multivariate analysis showed admission NIHSS score (P = .001) and the site of vessel occlusion (P = .022) to be significant CMR predictors. CMR was significantly less likely in patients with proximal occlusions (ICA, P = .005; proximal M1, P = .021). A CMR score better predicted CMR than either NIHSS or vessel occlusion site alone (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Milder baseline stroke deficit and distal vessel occlusion are significant predictors of CMR. A combination of these parameters better predicts CMR than either parameter alone.
Authors: Nuno Mendonça; David Rodriguez-Luna; Marta Rubiera; Sandra Boned-Riera; Marc Ribo; Jorge Pagola; Socorro Piñeiro; Pilar Meler; Jose Alvarez-Sabin; Joan Montaner; Carlos A Molina Journal: Stroke Date: 2011-12-01 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Matthew B Maas; Karen L Furie; Michael H Lev; Hakan Ay; Aneesh B Singhal; David M Greer; Gordon J Harris; Elkan Halpern; Walter J Koroshetz; Wade S Smith Journal: Stroke Date: 2009-07-16 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: O C Singer; J Berkefeld; M W Lorenz; J Fiehler; G W Albers; M G Lansberg; A Kastrup; A Rovira; D S Liebeskind; A Gass; C Rosso; L Derex; J S Kim; T Neumann-Haefelin Journal: Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2009-02-16 Impact factor: 2.762
Authors: Michael P Marks; Jean-Marc Olivot; Stephanie Kemp; Maarten G Lansberg; Roland Bammer; Lawrence R Wechsler; Gregory W Albers; Vincent Thijs Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Wade S Smith; Gene Sung; Jeffrey Saver; Ronald Budzik; Gary Duckwiler; David S Liebeskind; Helmi L Lutsep; Marilyn M Rymer; Randall T Higashida; Sidney Starkman; Y Pierre Gobin; Donald Frei; Thomas Grobelny; Frank Hellinger; Dan Huddle; Chelsea Kidwell; Walter Koroshetz; Michael Marks; Gary Nesbit; Isaac E Silverman Journal: Stroke Date: 2008-02-28 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: W Hacke; M Kaste; C Fieschi; D Toni; E Lesaffre; R von Kummer; G Boysen; E Bluhmki; G Höxter; M H Mahagne Journal: JAMA Date: 1995-10-04 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: A D Horsch; J W Dankbaar; J M Niesten; T van Seeters; I C van der Schaaf; Y van der Graaf; W P Th M Mali; B K Velthuis Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-04-23 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: E M Fanou; J Knight; R I Aviv; S-P Hojjat; S P Symons; L Zhang; M Wintermark Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-10-15 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Steven J Warach; Marie Luby; Gregory W Albers; Roland Bammer; Andrew Bivard; Bruce C V Campbell; Colin Derdeyn; Jeremy J Heit; Pooja Khatri; Maarten G Lansberg; David S Liebeskind; Charles B L M Majoie; Michael P Marks; Bijoy K Menon; Keith W Muir; Mark W Parsons; Achala Vagal; Albert J Yoo; Andrei V Alexandrov; Jean-Claude Baron; David J Fiorella; Anthony J Furlan; Josep Puig; Peter D Schellinger; Max Wintermark Journal: Stroke Date: 2016-04-12 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Ansaar T Rai; SoHyun Boo; Chelsea Buseman; Amelia K Adcock; Abdul R Tarabishy; Maurice M Miller; Thomas D Roberts; Jennifer R Domico; Jeffrey S Carpenter Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2017-01-06 Impact factor: 5.836
Authors: Nerea Arrarte Terreros; Agnetha A E Bruggeman; Isabella S J Swijnenburg; Laura C C van Meenen; Adrien E Groot; Jonathan M Coutinho; Yvo B W E M Roos; Bart J Emmer; Ludo F M Beenen; Ed van Bavel; Henk A Marquering; Charles B L M Majoie Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 8.572