BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Multimodal imaging is gaining an important role in acute stroke. The benefit of obtaining additional clinically relevant information must be weighed against the detriment of increased cost, delaying time to treatment, and adverse events such as contrast-induced nephropathy. Use of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score to predict a proximal arterial occlusion (PO) is suggested by several case series as a viable method of selecting cases appropriate for multimodal imaging. METHODS: Six hundred ninety-nine patients enrolled in a prospective cohort study involving CT angiographic imaging in acute stroke were dichotomized according to the presence of a PO, including a subgroup of 177 subjects with middle cerebral artery M1 occlusion. RESULTS: The median NIHSS score of patients found to have a PO was higher than the overall median (9 versus 5, P<0.0001). The median NIHSS score of patients with middle cerebral artery M1 occlusion was 14. NIHSS score > or =10 had 81% positive predictive value for PO but only 48% sensitivity with the majority of subjects with PO presenting with lower NIHSS scores. All patients with NIHSS score > or =2 would need to undergo angiographic imaging to detect 90% of PO. CONCLUSIONS: High NIHSS score correlates with the presence of a proximal arterial occlusion in patients presenting with acute cerebral ischemia. No NIHSS score threshold can be applied to select a subgroup of patients for angiographic imaging without failing to capture the majority of cases with clinically important occlusive lesions. The finding of minimal clinical deficits should not deter urgent angiographic imaging in otherwise appropriate patients suspected of acute stroke.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Multimodal imaging is gaining an important role in acute stroke. The benefit of obtaining additional clinically relevant information must be weighed against the detriment of increased cost, delaying time to treatment, and adverse events such as contrast-induced nephropathy. Use of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score to predict a proximal arterial occlusion (PO) is suggested by several case series as a viable method of selecting cases appropriate for multimodal imaging. METHODS: Six hundred ninety-nine patients enrolled in a prospective cohort study involving CT angiographic imaging in acute stroke were dichotomized according to the presence of a PO, including a subgroup of 177 subjects with middle cerebral artery M1 occlusion. RESULTS: The median NIHSS score of patients found to have a PO was higher than the overall median (9 versus 5, P<0.0001). The median NIHSS score of patients with middle cerebral artery M1 occlusion was 14. NIHSS score > or =10 had 81% positive predictive value for PO but only 48% sensitivity with the majority of subjects with PO presenting with lower NIHSS scores. All patients with NIHSS score > or =2 would need to undergo angiographic imaging to detect 90% of PO. CONCLUSIONS: High NIHSS score correlates with the presence of a proximal arterial occlusion in patients presenting with acute cerebral ischemia. No NIHSS score threshold can be applied to select a subgroup of patients for angiographic imaging without failing to capture the majority of cases with clinically important occlusive lesions. The finding of minimal clinical deficits should not deter urgent angiographic imaging in otherwise appropriate patients suspected of acute stroke.
Authors: C A Lewandowski; M Frankel; T A Tomsick; J Broderick; J Frey; W Clark; S Starkman; J Grotta; J Spilker; J Khoury; T Brott Journal: Stroke Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: M W Parsons; T Li; P A Barber; Q Yang; D G Darby; P M Desmond; R P Gerraty; B M Tress; S M Davis Journal: Neurology Date: 2000-08-22 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Werner Hacke; Markku Kaste; Erich Bluhmki; Miroslav Brozman; Antoni Dávalos; Donata Guidetti; Vincent Larrue; Kennedy R Lees; Zakaria Medeghri; Thomas Machnig; Dietmar Schneider; Rüdiger von Kummer; Nils Wahlgren; Danilo Toni Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-09-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: P Alan Barber; Mark W Parsons; Patricia M Desmond; Donald A Bennett; Geoffrey A Donnan; Brian M Tress; Stephen M Davis Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Shervin Kamalian; Andre Kemmling; Roderick C Borgie; Livia T Morais; Seyedmehdi Payabvash; Ana M Franceschi; Shahmir Kamalian; Albert J Yoo; Karen L Furie; Michael H Lev Journal: Stroke Date: 2013-08-29 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Jens Fiehler; Christophe Cognard; Mauro Gallitelli; Olav Jansen; Adam Kobayashi; Heinrich P Mattle; Keith W Muir; Mikael Mazighi; Karl Schaller; Peter D Schellinger Journal: Eur Stroke J Date: 2016-07-26
Authors: Rakesh Khatri; Mohammad Rauf Afzal; Gustavo J Rodriguez; Alberto Maud; Muhammad Shah Miran; Mohtashim Arbaab Qureshi; Salvador Cruz-Flores; Adnan I Qureshi Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Olvert A Berkhemer; Shervin Kamalian; R Gilberto González; Charles B L M Majoie; Albert J Yoo Journal: Cardiovasc Eng Technol Date: 2013-12-01 Impact factor: 2.495
Authors: Nitin Goyal; Georgios Tsivgoulis; Konark Malhotra; Muhammad F Ishfaq; Abhi Pandhi; Michael T Frohler; Alejandro M Spiotta; Mohammad Anadani; Marios Psychogios; Volker Maus; Adnan Siddiqui; Muhammad Waqas; Peter D Schellinger; Marcel Groen; Christos Krogias; Daniel Richter; Maher Saqqur; Pablo Garcia-Bermejo; Maxim Mokin; Ronen Leker; Jose E Cohen; Aristeidis H Katsanos; Georgios Magoufis; Klearchos Psychogios; Vasileios Lioutas; Meg VanNostrand; Vijay K Sharma; Maurizio Paciaroni; Alexandros Rentzos; Hazem Shoirah; J Mocco; Christopher Nickele; Violiza Inoa; Daniel Hoit; Lucas Elijovich; Andrei V Alexandrov; Adam S Arthur Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2020-01-01 Impact factor: 18.302