Literature DB >> 22700664

Burden of Congenital Rubella Syndrome (CRS) in India: a systematic review.

Pooja Dewan1, Piyush Gupta.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rubella, though a mild, vaccine-preventable disease, can manifest with severe teratogenic effects in the fetus labeled as congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) due to primary maternal rubella infection. Despite a reduction in disease burden of several vaccine-preventable diseases through childhood immunization, CRS continues to account for preventable severe morbidity including childhood blindness, deafness, heart disease, and mental retardation.
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review to describe the prevalence of CRS and its contribution to major long-term handicaps in Indian population. Another objective was to estimate the susceptibility to rubella infection in Indian adolescent girls and women of reproductive age-group. We also explored strategies to decrease CRS in India by identifying the immunogenicity of rubella containing vaccines (RCV) in Indian children and women, as well as their coverage in India.
METHODS: Publications reporting CRS prevalence in general population as well as selected subgroups i.e., suspected intra-uterine infection, congenital ocular abnormalities, deafness, congenital heart disease, mental retardation, and congenital malformations, seroprevalence to rubella (IgG) amongst women and adolescents, and immunogenicity and coverage of RCVs in Indian population were retrieved through a systematic search. Primary databases employed were Medline through PubMed and IndMed, websites of the WHO, and UNICEF. No restrictions were applied in terms of study designs. The primary outcome measure was congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) which was further categorized as suspected CRS and confirmed CRS as defined by World Health Organization (WHO).
RESULTS: Comprehensive evidence about the true burden of CRS in India is not available. Almost all studies have been done in nstitutional/hospital set-ups and community-based studies are grossly lacking. There are no studies assessing the prevalence of CRS in general population. All studies have evaluated the CRS burden in symptomatic cohorts of children. 1-15% of all infants suspected to have intra-uterine infection were found to have laboratory evidence of CRS. About 3-10% of suspected CRS cases are ultimately proven to have confirmed CRS with the aid of laboratory tests. CRS accounts for 10-15% of pediatric cataract. 10-50% of children with congenital anomalies have laboratory evidence of CRS. 10-30% of adolescent females and 12-30% of women in the reproductive age-group are susceptible to rubella infection in India. RCVs are highly immunogenic in Indian adolescents and women. The coverage data of RCVs in India is not available. However, the coverage of MMR vaccine has been reported as 42%, 30% and 5% from Delhi, Chandigarh and Goa, respectively.
CONCLUSION: This systematic review identifies and explores factors associated with the prevalence of CRS in India. There is a need for urgent action in terms of revamping the national immunization policy and introduction of RCVs in the national immunization program. Active surveillance of rubella and CRS is needed to redress the burden of CRS in India.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22700664     DOI: 10.1007/s13312-012-0087-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian Pediatr        ISSN: 0019-6061            Impact factor:   1.411


  24 in total

1.  An infant with congenital rubella syndrome in developing India.

Authors:  Ajit Singh; Sharon Narula; Hashir Kareem; Tom Devasia
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2017-11-28

2.  Sero-prevalence of rubella among pregnant women in Sub-Saharan Africa: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zemenu Yohannes Kassa; Siraj Hussen; Solomon Asnake
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Identification of germinal centres in the lymph node of a patient with hyperimmunoglobulin M syndrome associated with congenital rubella.

Authors:  Rohan Ameratunga; Chun-Jen J Chen; Wikke Koopmans; P Rod Dunbar; Maia Brewerton; Richard Lloydd; Claudia J Mansell; Chris van Vliet; See-Tarn Woon
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 8.317

4.  Congenital rubella syndrome with blueberry muffin lesions and extensive metaphysitis.

Authors:  Mohemmed Ajij; Sushma Nangia; Bhavna Sharma Dubey
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-12-05

5.  "If they tell me to get it, I'll get it. If they don't...": Immunization decision-making processes of immigrant mothers.

Authors:  Stephanie P Kowal; Cynthia G Jardine; Tania M Bubela
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2015-04-29

6.  Violaceous Maculopapular Rash in a Newborn: Congenital Rubella Syndrome.

Authors:  Nikita Gandhi; Vibhu Mendiratta; Shailja Shukla; Ritu Rawat; Shiwangi Rana; Ram Chander
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.494

Review 7.  Post-exposure passive immunisation for preventing rubella and congenital rubella syndrome.

Authors:  Megan K Young; Allan W Cripps; Graeme R Nimmo; Mieke L van Driel
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-09

Review 8.  Genetics of congenital heart disease: the glass half empty.

Authors:  Akl C Fahed; Bruce D Gelb; J G Seidman; Christine E Seidman
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 17.367

9.  Indigenous Medicine Use for Sex Selection During Pregnancy and Risk of Congenital Malformations: A Population-Based Case-Control Study in Haryana, India.

Authors:  Sutapa Bandyopadhyay Neogi; Preeti H Negandhi; Navraj Sandhu; Ravi Kant Gupta; Abhijit Ganguli; Sanjay Zodpey; Amarjeet Singh; Arun Singh; Rakesh Gupta
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.228

10.  Assessment of knowledge and awareness regarding rubella infection among medical professionals seen in IGIMS, Bihar.

Authors:  Dipali Prasad; Nidhi Prasad; Kanchan Kumari; Varsha Singh; Urvashi Mishra; Neeru Goel
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2021-05-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.