Literature DB >> 26091849

Indigenous Medicine Use for Sex Selection During Pregnancy and Risk of Congenital Malformations: A Population-Based Case-Control Study in Haryana, India.

Sutapa Bandyopadhyay Neogi1, Preeti H Negandhi, Navraj Sandhu, Ravi Kant Gupta, Abhijit Ganguli, Sanjay Zodpey, Amarjeet Singh, Arun Singh, Rakesh Gupta.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Congenital malformations (CMFs) are a major public health problem in India. Consanguineous marriages, infections during pregnancy, folic acid deficiency during the periconceptional period, exposure to pesticides and a history of intake of drugs during pregnancy have been hypothesized as risk factors. Drugs include oral contraceptive pills, progesterone analogues, medications for ailments and indigenous drugs to bear male offspring. It is important to analyze the risk factors in order to implement preventive measures. The prime objective of this study was to study the risk factors of visible structural CMFs, with a focus on indigenous medicines for sex selection.
METHODS: A population-based, case-control study was undertaken in Haryana state. Cases included children (0-18 months) with any apparent structural deformity as reported by various Government sources. A consecutive birth from the same area as the case was labelled and included as the control. The sample size calculated was 175 in each group. Mothers of every case and control were interviewed at their respective homes using a structured tool. Descriptive analysis, bivariate analysis, followed by logistic regression was conducted to establish the association between risk factors and CMFs.
RESULTS: The sociodemographic profiles of the cases and controls were similar. Among the various risk factors studied, more than two living children (unadjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.6, 95 % CI 1.04-2.4) and intake of sex-selection drugs (unadjusted OR 2.8, 95 % CI 1.6-5.1) were significant risk factors on bivariate and regression analyses. The risk of having a child with CMFs was threefold more among mothers with a history of intake of indigenous medicines for sex selection (adjusted OR 3; 95 % CI 1.7-5.6).
CONCLUSIONS: The intake of indigenous drugs during pregnancy increased the risk of CMFs almost threefold. This has social as well as economic implications, and hence needs further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26091849     DOI: 10.1007/s40264-015-0309-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.228


  28 in total

1.  Use of herbal treatments in pregnancy.

Authors:  Carol Louik; Paula Gardiner; Katherine Kelley; Allen A Mitchell
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Cardiac toxicity following short-term exposure to methomyl in spraymen and rabbits.

Authors:  H N Saiyed; H G Sadhu; V K Bhatnagar; A Dewan; K Venkaiah; S K Kashyap
Journal:  Hum Exp Toxicol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Safety evaluation of commonly used Chinese herbal medicines during pregnancy in mice.

Authors:  Chi Chiu Wang; Lu Li; Ling Yin Tang; Ping Chung Leung
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Use of Coptidis Rhizoma and foetal growth: a follow-up study of 9,895 pregnancies.

Authors:  Chao-Hua Chuang; Jung-Nien Lai; Jung-Der Wang; Pei-Jen Chang; Pau-Chung Chen
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.890

5.  Congenital malformations: unexplored causes.

Authors:  Sutapa Bandhyopadhyay Neogi
Journal:  Indian Pediatr       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.411

6.  Infant mortality and congenital anomalies from 1950 to 1994: an international perspective.

Authors:  A Rosano; L D Botto; B Botting; P Mastroiacovo
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  An epidemiological study of congenital malformations in rural children.

Authors:  V Kumar; A J Singh; R K Marwaha
Journal:  Indian Pediatr       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 1.411

8.  Congenital malformations at birth in Central India: A rural medical college hospital based data.

Authors:  Amar Taksande; Krishna Vilhekar; Pushpa Chaturvedi; Manish Jain
Journal:  Indian J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-09

Review 9.  Birth defects in India: Hidden truth, need for urgent attention.

Authors:  Rinku Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-04

10.  A community-based survey of visible congenital anomalies in rural Tamil Nadu.

Authors:  K Sridhar
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2009-10
View more
  6 in total

1.  Comment on: "Indigenous Medicine Use for Sex Selection During Pregnancy and Risk of Congenital Malformations: A Population-Based Case-Control Study in Haryana, India".

Authors:  Sibel Yöntem; Belgin Maden-Tastan; Yusuf Cem Kaplan
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Authors' Reply to Sibel Yöntem and Colleagues' Comment on "Indigenous Medicine Use for Sex Selection During Pregnancy and Risk of Congenital Malformations: A Population-Based Case-Control Study in Haryana, India".

Authors:  Sutapa Bandyopadhyay Neogi; Preeti H Negandhi; Ravi Kant Gupta; Abhijit Ganguli; Sanjay Zodpey; Amarjeet Singh; Rakesh Gupta
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Walking the Fine Line between Science and Culture.

Authors:  Lee P Shulman
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Consumption of indigenous medicines by pregnant women in North India for selecting sex of the foetus: what can it lead to?

Authors:  Sutapa Bandyopadhyay Neogi; Preeti H Negandhi; Abhijit Ganguli; Sapna Chopra; Navraj Sandhu; Ravi Kant Gupta; Sanjay Zodpey; Amarjeet Singh; Arun Singh; Rakesh Gupta
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Risk factors for orofacial clefts in India: A case-control study.

Authors:  Sutapa Bandyopadhyay Neogi; Samiksha Singh; Dinesh Raj Pallepogula; Hira Pant; Sunanda Reddy Kolli; Priyanka Bharti; Vikram Datta; Srinivas Reddy Gosla; Krishnamurthy Bonanthaya; Andy Ness; Sanjay Kinra; Pat Doyle; Venkata Satyanarayana Murthy Gudlavalleti
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 2.344

6.  Evidence of prenatal toxicity of herbal based indigenous formulations for sex selection in rat models.

Authors:  Sutapa Bandyopadhyay Neogi; Dilip Kumar Roy; Anand Kamal Sachdeva; Rashmi Sharma; Rakesh Gupta; Abhijit Ganguli
Journal:  J Tradit Complement Med       Date:  2019-09-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.