Literature DB >> 22700493

Dietary inclusion of feathers affects intestinal microbiota and microbial metabolites in growing Leghorn-type chickens.

B Meyer1, W Bessei, A W Bessei, W Vahjen, J Zentek, A Harlander-Matauschek.   

Abstract

Feather pecking in laying hens is a serious behavioral problem that is often associated with feather eating. The intake of feathers may influence the gut microbiota and its metabolism. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of 2 different diets, with or without 5% ground feathers, on the gut microbiota and the resulting microbial fermentation products and to identify keratin-degrading bacteria in chicken digesta. One-day-old Lohmann-Selected Leghorn chicks were divided into 3 feeding groups: group A (control), B (5% ground feathers in the diet), and C, in which the control diet was fed until wk 12 and then switched to the 5% feather diet to study the effect of time of first feather ingestion. The gut microbiota was analyzed by cultivation and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of ileum and cecum digesta. Short-chain fatty acids, ammonia, and lactate concentrations were measured as microbial metabolites. The concentration of keratinolytic bacteria increased after feather ingestion in the ileum (P < 0.001) and cecum (P = 0.033). Bacterial species that hydrolyzed keratin were identified as Enterococcus faecium, Lactobacillus crispatus, Lactobacillus reuteri-like species (97% sequence homology), and Lactobacillus salivarius-like species (97% sequence homology). Molecular analysis of cecal DNA extracts showed that the feather diet lowered the bacterial diversity indicated by a reduced richness (P < 0.001) and shannon (P = 0.012) index. The pattern of microbial metabolites indicated some changes, especially in the cecum. This study showed that feather intake induced an adaptation of the intestinal microbiota in chickens. It remains unclear to what extent the changed metabolism of the microbiota reflects the feather intake and could have an effect on the behavior of the hens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22700493     DOI: 10.3382/ps.2011-01786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  15 in total

1.  Differences in gut microbiota composition of laying hen lines divergently selected on feather pecking.

Authors:  Jerine A J van der Eijk; Hugo de Vries; Joergen B Kjaer; Marc Naguib; Bas Kemp; Hauke Smidt; T Bas Rodenburg; Aart Lammers
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Campylobacter jejuni BumSR directs a response to butyrate via sensor phosphatase activity to impact transcription and colonization.

Authors:  Kyle N Goodman; Matthew J Powers; Alexander A Crofts; M Stephen Trent; David R Hendrixson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Parents and early life environment affect behavioral development of laying hen chickens.

Authors:  Elske N de Haas; J Elizabeth Bolhuis; Bas Kemp; Ton G G Groothuis; T Bas Rodenburg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Differential fecal microbiota are retained in broiler chicken lines divergently selected for fatness traits.

Authors:  Qiangchuan Hou; Lai-Yu Kwok; Yi Zheng; Lifeng Wang; Zhuang Guo; Jiachao Zhang; Weiqiang Huang; Yuxiang Wang; Li Leng; Hui Li; Heping Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Host and Environmental Factors Affecting the Intestinal Microbiota in Chickens.

Authors:  Jannigje G Kers; Francisca C Velkers; Egil A J Fischer; Gerben D A Hermes; J A Stegeman; Hauke Smidt
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Differences in cecal microbiome of selected high and low feather-pecking laying hens.

Authors:  P Birkl; A Bharwani; J B Kjaer; W Kunze; P McBride; P Forsythe; A Harlander-Matauschek
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Quantitative genetic background of the host influences gut microbiomes in chickens.

Authors:  Lele Zhao; Gang Wang; Paul Siegel; Chuan He; Hezhong Wang; Wenjing Zhao; Zhengxiao Zhai; Fengwei Tian; Jianxin Zhao; Hao Zhang; Zikui Sun; Wei Chen; Yan Zhang; He Meng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Omnivores Going Astray: A Review and New Synthesis of Abnormal Behavior in Pigs and Laying Hens.

Authors:  Emma I Brunberg; T Bas Rodenburg; Lotta Rydhmer; Joergen B Kjaer; Per Jensen; Linda J Keeling
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-07-22

9.  Analysis of the brain transcriptome in lines of laying hens divergently selected for feather pecking.

Authors:  Clemens Falker-Gieske; Andrea Mott; Siegfried Preuß; Sören Franzenburg; Werner Bessei; Jörn Bennewitz; Jens Tetens
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Cecal motility and the impact of Lactobacillus in feather pecking laying hens.

Authors:  Nienke van Staaveren; Julia Krumma; Paul Forsythe; Joergen B Kjaer; Isabelle Y Kwon; Yu-Kang Mao; Christine West; Wolfgang Kunze; Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.