Literature DB >> 22699985

Hearing preservation and hearing improvement after reimplantation of pediatric and adult patients with partial deafness: a retrospective case series review.

Janitha Jayawardena1, Jafri Kuthubutheen, Gunesh Rajan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report and review the clinical experiences of patients who required reimplantation from an ongoing trial of patients with partial deafness who were treated with electroacoustic stimulation (EAS) cochlear implantation. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective case series review.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Two patients with partial deafness, 1 child and 1 adult, who required reimplantation because of device failure occurring 12 to 18 months after hearing preservation cochlear implantation with a Med-El Sonata Flex-EAS electrode array. INTERVENTION: Reimplantation (with full insertion) of a Med-El Sonata Flex-EAS array (child) and the new complete cochlear coverage Med-El Sonata Flex-28 electrode array (adult). Surgical techniques used include round window insertion with slow insertion speed and the use of preoperative systemic steroids and preoperative, perioperative, and postimplantation intratympanic steroids. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Preservation of residual hearing.
RESULTS: Both patients had complete preservation of residual hearing after reimplantation. The adult patient had stable improvement in hearing from 750 to 2,000 Hz of 5 to 10 dB. Both patients reported increased benefit after reimplantation.
CONCLUSION: We report a case series of successful pediatric and adult EAS reimplantation, in the adult hearing improvement after reimplantation with a deep insertion electrode was observed. Reimplantation with preservation of residual hearing in patients with EAS is possible with current surgical hearing preserving techniques and atraumatic electrode arrays of variable length.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22699985     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318255dd91

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  6 in total

1.  Would an endosteal CI-electrode make sense? Comparison of the auditory nerve excitability from different stimulation sites using ESRT measurements and mathematical models.

Authors:  Hans Wilhelm Pau; Annekathrin Grünbaum; Karsten Ehrt; Rüdiger Dahl; Tino Just; Ursula van Rienen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Influence of cochleostomy and cochlear implant insertion on drug gradients following intratympanic application in Guinea pigs.

Authors:  E B King; J J Hartsock; S J O'Leary; A N Salt
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 1.854

Review 3.  Challenging aspects of contemporary cochlear implant electrode array design.

Authors:  Pavel Mistrík; Claude Jolly; Daniel Sieber; Ingeborg Hochmair
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-03-30

Review 4.  Research Status and Future Development of Cochlear Reimplantation.

Authors:  Xinyi Yao; Haotian Liu; Jinyuan Si; Xiuyong Ding; Yu Zhao; Yun Zheng
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Hearing Improvement After Pain Related to Cochlear Implant Explantation: A Case Report.

Authors:  Isra Aljazeeri; Maha Alrajhi; Abdulrahman Hagr
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 1.316

Review 6.  Systematic Literature Review of Hearing Preservation Rates in Cochlear Implantation Associated With Medium- and Longer-Length Flexible Lateral Wall Electrode Arrays.

Authors:  Paul H Van de Heyning; Stefan Dazert; Javier Gavilan; Luis Lassaletta; Artur Lorens; Gunesh P Rajan; Henryk Skarzynski; Piotr H Skarzynski; Dayse Tavora-Vieira; Vedat Topsakal; Shin-Ichi Usami; Vincent Van Rompaey; Nora M Weiss; Marek Polak
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-07-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.