Literature DB >> 22699701

Esophageal pressure: benefit and limitations.

G Hedenstierna1.   

Abstract

The recording of esophageal pressure (Pes) in supine position as a substitute for pleural pressure is difficult and fraught with potential errors. Pes is affected by the: 1) elastance and weight of the lung; 2) elastance and weight of the rib cage; 3) weight of the mediastinal organs; 4) elastance and weight of the diaphragm and abdomen; 5) elastance of the esophageal wall; and 6) elastance of the esophageal balloon (if filled with too much air). If the purpose is to measure lung compliance in the intensive care patient, reasonably useful information might be obtained by measuring airway pressure alone, considering chest wall compliance to be a weight that is forced away by the ventilation. Such weight requires a constant pressure for displacement. The transpulmonary pressure, whether calculated with Pes or by another measure of abdominal pressure, may guide in PEEP titration. It may also enable calculation of stresses applied to the lung and these may be more important in guiding an optimal ventilator setting than an optimum compliance or oxygenation of blood. Diaphragm function can be estimated by esophageal minus gastric pressure and with even more precision, when combined with diaphragm electromyography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22699701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol        ISSN: 0375-9393            Impact factor:   3.051


  23 in total

1.  Measurements Obtained From Esophageal Balloon Catheters Are Affected by the Esophageal Balloon Filling Volume in Children With ARDS.

Authors:  Justin C Hotz; Cary T Sodetani; Jeffrey Van Steenbergen; Robinder G Khemani; Timothy W Deakers; Christopher J Newth
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 2.258

Review 2.  Mechanisms of the effects of prone positioning in acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  C Guerin; L Baboi; J C Richard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  What's new in respiratory physiology? The expanding chest wall revisited!

Authors:  Ola Stenqvist; Luciano Gattinoni; Göran Hedenstierna
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Understanding the setting of PEEP from esophageal pressure in patients with ARDS.

Authors:  Davide Chiumello; Claude Guérin
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Can we estimate transpulmonary pressure without an esophageal balloon?-yes.

Authors:  Ola Stenqvist; Per Persson; Stefan Lundin
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-10

Review 6.  Efficacy of prone position in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: A pathophysiology-based review.

Authors:  Vasilios Koulouras; Georgios Papathanakos; Athanasios Papathanasiou; Georgios Nakos
Journal:  World J Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-05-04

Review 7.  Monitoring of lung function in acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Anders Larsson; Claude Guerin
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-07

Review 8.  Technical aspects of bedside respiratory monitoring of transpulmonary pressure.

Authors:  Francesco Mojoli; Francesca Torriglia; Anita Orlando; Isabella Bianchi; Eric Arisi; Marco Pozzi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-10

Review 9.  Interpretation of the transpulmonary pressure in the critically ill patient.

Authors:  Michele Umbrello; Davide Chiumello
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-10

10.  The assessment of transpulmonary pressure in mechanically ventilated ARDS patients.

Authors:  Davide Chiumello; Massimo Cressoni; Andrea Colombo; Giovanni Babini; Matteo Brioni; Francesco Crimella; Stefan Lundin; Ola Stenqvist; Luciano Gattinoni
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.