| Literature DB >> 22697049 |
Kate S Collison1, Nadine J Makhoul, Marya Z Zaidi, Rana Al-Rabiah, Angela Inglis, Bernard L Andres, Rosario Ubungen, Mohammed Shoukri, Futwan A Al-Mohanna.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that the effects of certain food additives may be synergistic or additive. Aspartame (ASP) and Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) are ubiquitous food additives with a common moiety: both contain acidic amino acids which can act as neurotransmitters, interacting with NMDA receptors concentrated in areas of the Central Nervous System regulating energy expenditure and conservation. MSG has been shown to promote a neuroendocrine dysfunction when large quantities are administered to mammals during the neonatal period. ASP is a low-calorie dipeptide sweetener found in a wide variety of diet beverages and foods. However, recent reports suggest that ASP may promote weight gain and hyperglycemia in a zebrafish nutritional model.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22697049 PMCID: PMC3466134 DOI: 10.1186/1743-7075-9-58
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr Metab (Lond) ISSN: 1743-7075 Impact factor: 4.169
Composition of the Standard Chow diet used throughout the study
| Protein (%) | 22.5 | 22.5 | 22.5 | 22.5 |
| Carbohydrate (%) | 64.2 | 64.2 | 64.2 | 64.2 |
| Fat (%) (Ether extract) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fiber (%) | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Vitamins, Minerals & Ash (%) | 5.3 | 5.3 | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Energy (kcal/g) | 3.36 | 3.36 | 3.36 | 3.36 |
| Aspartame (%) | 0 | 0 | 0.025 | 0.025 |
| Monosodium Glutamate (%) | 0 | 0.075 | 0 | 0.075 |
Constituents are expressed as percentage of ration except where otherwise indicated.
Figure 1Food (A,B) and fluid (C,D) intake in mice at 7 (A,C) and 15 weeks of age (B,D), according to diet groups (n = 18). Statistically significant differences are shown using different letters a,b. Significant gender-wise differences are denoted by * P < .05.
Effect of aspartame (ASP) and MSG on body weight, fat deposition and lipid profile
| 6 Week Body Weight (g) | | | | | | | | | |
| male | 18.1 ± 0.26 | 17.41 ± 0.33 | 17.97 ± 0.22 | 19.39 ± 0.19 | <.0001 | ||||
| female | 14.34** ± 0.17 | 14.15** ± 0.21 | 14.40** ± 0.15 | 15.95** ± 0.19 | <.0001 | ||||
| 17 Week Body Weight (g) | | | | | | | | | |
| male | 24.92 ± 0.34 | 25.61 ± 0.32 | 25.5 ± 0.31 | 27.84 ± 0.42 | <.0001 | ||||
| female | 19.24** ± 0.19 | 18.70** ± 0.19 | 19.66** ± 0.26 | 21.61** ± 0.23 | <.0001 | ||||
| Weight Change (%)† | | | | | | | | | |
| male | 37.79 ± 1.18a | | 46.46 ± 2.28b | | 42.03 ± 1.38ab | | 43.7 ± 2.04ab | | 0.06 |
| female | 34.41 ± 1.47 | 33.64** ± 1.28 | 36.67* ± 1.7 | 35.56** ± 1.12 | <.0001 | ||||
| Visceral Fat (g) | | | | | | | | | |
| male | 0.31 ± 0.02 | | 0.34 ± 0.03 | | 0.34 ± 0.03 | | 0.38 ± 0.03 | | 0.189 |
| female | 0.15** ± 0.02 | 0.14** ± 0.01 | 0.13** ± 0.01 | 0.18** ± 0.02 | <.0001 | ||||
| Insulin (uIU/mL) | | | | | | | | | |
| male | 8.76 ± 1.16 | | 8.67 ± 1.7 | | 5.43 ± 1.02 | | 9.67 ± 1.83 | | 0.197 |
| female | 4.61** ± 0.74 | 5.23 ± 0.65 | 4.34 ± 1.18 | 6.07 ± 1.20 | <0.001 | ||||
| TG (mg/dL)† | | | | | | | | | |
| male | 124.56 ± 6.1a | | 92.88 ± 4.45b | | 95.97 ± 5.61b | | 125.39 ± 2.91a | | <.0001 |
| female | 123.11 ± 5.05a | 84.47 ± 4.56b | 93.54 ± 5.59b | 93.27** ± 5.03b | <0.01 | ||||
| T-CHOL (mg/dL) | | | | | | | | | |
| male | 133.33 ± 2.26 | 123.94 ± 1.19 | 118.17 ± 1.2 | 123.56 ± 1.01 | <.0001 | ||||
| female | 133 ± 1.81 | 123.56 ± 1.2 | 122.33** ± 0.81 | 124.5 ± 0.92 | 0.276 | ||||
| HDL-C (mg/dL) | | | | | | | | | |
| male | 87.48 ± 5.24 | 71.19 ± 3.21 | 83.36 ± 2.39 | 73.33 ± 2.52 | <.01 | ||||
| female | 57.62** ± 3.17 | 54.46** ± 2.19 | 51.16** ± 2.2 | 49.38** ± 1.7 | <.0001 | ||||
Data presented are Means ± SEM (n = 18 per diet and per gender). P-values were calculated using 2-way ANOVA. Significant differences between diets are indicated using different letters in bold . *,** indicates p-value of < .05 and < .01 for the comparison of males to females within each diet.
Data presented are means ± SEM.
P-values for diet and gender are calculated using two way ANOVA.
Significant differences between diets are shown using different letters .
† Diet*Gender interaction was found to be significant (P < 0.05). Letters abc indicate significant differences between diets separately for each gender.
*,** indicate p-value of < .05, <.01 for the comparison of males to females within each diet.
Figure 2Effect of aspartame (ASP) and MSG on fasting glucose levels in C57Bl/6 J mice. Statistically significant differences are shown using different letters abc (n = 18 per diet and per gender).
Figure 3Random-fed insulin tolerance test. Glucose levels following insulin challenge in (A) male mice and (B) female mice at 0,15,30,45 and 60 minutes after challenge. Dissimilar means are denoted by **,*** indicating p-values of < .01 and < .001. Area Under the Curve (AUC GLUCOSE) as a measure of insulin resistance in (C) males and (D) females. Statistically significant differences are shown using different letters abc.
AUC, Kand T values during a random-fed insulin tolerance test administered to male and female C57Bl/6 J mice (n = 18 per gender)
| Basal Glucose (mg/dL) | | | | | | | | | |
| male | 119.36a | 2.80 | 117.92a | 4.71 | 143.72 | 5.41b | 122.64a | 2.90 | <.0001 |
| female | 112.39ab | 4.49 | 108.50a | 1.96 | 120.33ab** | 4.94 | 125.08b | 2.30 | <.01 |
| AUCGLUCOSE (mg/dL.min) | | | | | | | | | |
| male | 4829.58a | 131.96 | 5522.29ab | 152.69 | 5829.79bc | 197.07 | 6454.79c | 266.98 | <.0001 |
| female | 4819.93 | 190.36 | 4717.92** | 76.45 | 5288.33 | 217.38 | 5057.92** | 233.79 | 0.156 |
| K. ITT (%/min) | | | | | | | | | |
| male | 2.92a | 0.28 | 2.10ab | 0.20 | 2.32a | 0.29 | 1.15b | 0.26 | 0.001 |
| female | 2.60 | 0.37 | 2.28 | 0.26 | 2.40 | 0.19 | 1.95* | 0.26 | 0.436 |
| T½GLUCOSE (min) | | | | | | | | | |
| male | 39.69a | 14.05 | 37.91a | 3.84 | 51.61ab | 16.63 | 105.56b | 23.72 | 0.022 |
| female | 39.02 | 6.38 | 41.54 | 7.66 | 32.36 | 2.90 | 92.55 | 36.44 | 0.105 |
Significant differences between diets are indicated by different letters abc. *, ** indicate differences between males and females within each diet P < 0.05 and 0.01 respectively.
P-values for comparison of diets are calculated using one way ANOVA, dissimilar means are denoted by different letters abc.
*,** indicate p-value of < .05, <.01 when comparing males to females within each diet group.
Pearson correlation analysis of insulin resistance parameters, ASP and MSG intake and body characteristics in C57BL/6 J mice
| ASP Intake (mg/kg) | | |||||||||||||
| MSG Intake (mg/kg) | 0.181 | | ||||||||||||
| 6 Week Body Weight (g) | | |||||||||||||
| 17 Week Body Weight (g) | | |||||||||||||
| Weight Change (%) | 0.151 | −0.090 | | |||||||||||
| Visceral Fat (g) | 0.078 | 0.222 | | |||||||||||
| Fasting Glucose (mg/dL) | | |||||||||||||
| T-CHOL (mg/dL) | −0.222 | 0.030 | 0.031 | 0.142 | 0.196 | −0.058 | | |||||||
| HDL-C (mg/dL) | −0.172 | −0.098 | −0.216 | −0.237 | 0.014 | −0.153 | 0.050 | | ||||||
| TG (mg/dL) | −0.053 | 0.015 | 0.161 | −0.241 | −0.100 | 0.075 | | |||||||
| Random Glucose (mg/dL) | 0.241 | −0.102 | 0.175 | −0.126 | 0.084 | | ||||||||
| AUCGLUCOSE (mg/dL.min) | 0.235 | −0.126 | −0.071 | 0.005 | 0.073 | 0.150 | 0.080 | 0.173 | 0.076 | | ||||
| K.ITT (%/min) | −0.214 | −0.202 | −0.017 | −0.068 | −0.085 | −0.184 | −0.145 | 0.139 | −0.090 | 0.107 | −0.080 | | ||
| T½GLUCOSE (min) | 0.135 | 0.214 | 0.218 | 0.041 | 0.235 | 0.255* | 0.077 | −0.032 | −0.101 | 0.038 | −0.066 |
Significant correlations are indicated in bold by ** at the 0.01 level and * at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). Correlations in males (n = 72) are indicated in italics (top right), and correlations in female subjects (n = 72) are shown in the bottom left of the table.
Significant correlations are indicated in bold by ** at the 0.01 level and * at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
Correlations in males are indicated in italics.