Literature DB >> 22696360

Telemedicine for the support of parents of high-risk newborn infants.

Kenneth Tan1, Nai Ming Lai.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Telemedicine is the use of electronic communications technology to provide care for patients when distance separates the practitioner and the patient. As the parents and families of infants admitted to the NICU require major support from health professionals in terms of information and time, telemedicine has the potential to increase this support.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate if the use of telemedicine technology to support families of newborn infants receiving intensive care affects the length of hospital stay and parental/family satisfaction. SEARCH
METHODS: We searched the following databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, 2011, Issue 8), MEDLINE (from 1966 to September 2011), EMBASE (1980 to September 2011). We also searched ClinicalTrials.gov (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov) and the EudraCT (http://eudract.emea.eu.int) web sites. We searched the proceedings of conferences of the Canadian Society of Telehealth, American Telemedicine Association, the International Society for Telemedicine, the Annual Conference of The International e-Health Association, American Medical Informatics Association and MedInfo. SELECTION CRITERIA: We attempted to identify randomised controlled trials that assessed the use of telemedicine designed to support parents of infants cared for in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) compared with standard support measures. Our primary outcome was the length of hospital stay, and secondary outcomes included parental and staff satisfaction, emergency hospital visits post-discharge and family utilisation of infant health-related resources. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently screened the studies, extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias of the one included study using the standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. We planned to express treatment effects as risk ratio (RR), risk difference (RD), number needed to treat (NNT) and mean difference (MD) where appropriate, using a fixed-effect model. MAIN
RESULTS: A single study was included for analysis in this review. This study compared the use of telemedicine (Baby Carelink) for parents and families of infants in the NICU with a control group without access to this programme and assessed the length of hospital stay for the infants and family satisfaction in multiple components of infant care. The study shows no difference in the length of hospital stay (average length of stay: telemedicine group: 68.5 days (standard deviation (SD) 28.3 days), control group: 70.6 days (SD 35.6 days), MD -2.10 days (95% confidence interval: -18.85 to 14.65 days). There was insufficient information for further analysis of measures of family satisfaction. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to support or refute the use of telemedicine technology to support the parents of high-risk newborn infants receiving intensive care. Clinical trials are needed to assess the application of telemedicine to support parents and families of infants in NICU with length of hospital stay and their perception of NICU care as the major outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22696360      PMCID: PMC7387237          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006818.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  37 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances: Telemedicine.

Authors:  R Wootton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-09-08

2.  The effect of telemedicine on neonatal intensive care unit length of stay in very low birthweight infants.

Authors:  M C Rendina
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1998

3.  Information technology for children's health and health care: report on the Information Technology in Children's Health Care Expert Meeting, September 21-22, 2000.

Authors:  R N Shiffman; S A Spooner; K Kwiatkowski; P F Brennan
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Revision of the Parenting Stress Index.

Authors:  B H Loyd; R R Abidin
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  1985-06

Review 5.  Telemedicine versus face to face patient care: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.

Authors:  R Currell; C Urquhart; P Wainwright; R Lewis
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2000

6.  Interaction between high-risk infants and their mothers: the NCAST as an assessment tool.

Authors:  A M Farel; V A Freeman; N L Keenan; C J Huber
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 2.228

7.  The ComputerLink projects: a decade of experience.

Authors:  P F Brennan
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  1997

8.  Impact of telemedicine on the practice of pediatric cardiology in community hospitals.

Authors:  Craig A Sable; Susan D Cummings; Gail D Pearson; Lorraine M Schratz; Russell C Cross; Eric S Quivers; Harish Rudra; Gerard R Martin
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 9.  Teleconsultations: who uses them and how?

Authors:  Pekka T Jaatinen; Jari Forsström; Pekka Loula
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.184

10.  The use of telemedicine to provide pediatric critical care consultations to pediatric trauma patients admitted to a remote trauma intensive care unit: a preliminary report.

Authors:  James P Marcin; Donald E Schepps; Kimberly A Page; Steven N Struve; Eule Nagrampa; Robert J Dimand
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.624

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Telehealth and indigenous populations around the world: a systematic review on current modalities for physical and mental health.

Authors:  Aprill Z Dawson; Rebekah J Walker; Jennifer A Campbell; Tatiana M Davidson; Leonard E Egede
Journal:  Mhealth       Date:  2020-07-05

2.  Expanding the reach of preventive interventions: development of an Internet-based training for parents of infants.

Authors:  Edward G Feil; Kathleen M Baggett; Betsy Davis; Lisa Sheeber; Susan Landry; Judith J Carta; Jay Buzhardt
Journal:  Child Maltreat       Date:  2008-11

Review 3.  Facilitators and barriers to quality of care in maternal, newborn and child health: a global situational analysis through metareview.

Authors:  Manisha Nair; Sachiyo Yoshida; Thierry Lambrechts; Cynthia Boschi-Pinto; Krishna Bose; Elizabeth Mary Mason; Matthews Mathai
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Telemedicine in Neonatal Home Care: Identifying Parental Needs Through Participatory Design.

Authors:  Kristina Garne; Anne Brødsgaard; Gitte Zachariassen; Jane Clemensen
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2016-07-08

Review 5.  The impact of health information technology on patient safety.

Authors:  Yasser K Alotaibi; Frank Federico
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.484

6.  Transitions to virtual early childhood home visitation during COVID-19.

Authors:  Dorian Traube; Sharlene Gozalians; Lei Duan
Journal:  Infant Ment Health J       Date:  2021-12-25

Review 7.  Evidence from district level inputs to improve quality of care for maternal and newborn health: interventions and findings.

Authors:  Rehana A Salam; Zohra S Lassi; Jai K Das; Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.223

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.