Literature DB >> 22695776

Scientific fraud in 20 falsified anesthesia papers : detection using financial auditing methods.

J Hein1, R Zobrist, C Konrad, G Schuepfer.   

Abstract

Data from natural sources show counter-intuitive distribution patterns for the leading digits to the left of the decimal point and the digit 1 is observed more frequently than all other numbers. This pattern, which was first described by Newcomb and later confirmed by Benford, is used in financial and tax auditing to detect fraud. Deviations from the pattern indicate possible falsifications. Anesthesiology journals are affected not only by ghostwriting and plagiarism but also by counterfeiting. In the present study 20 publications in anesthesiology known to be falsified by an author were investigated for irregularities with respect to Benford's law using the χ(2)-test and the Z-test. In the 20 retracted publications an average first-digit frequency of 243.1 (standard deviation SD ± 118.2, range: 30-592) and an average second-digit frequency of 132.3 (SD ± 72.2, range: 15-383) were found. The observed distribution of the first and second digits to the left of the decimal point differed significantly (p< 0.01) from the expected distribution described by Benford. Only the observed absolute frequencies for digits 3, 4 and 5 did not differ significantly from the expected values. In an analysis of each paper 17 out of 20 studies differed significantly from the expected value for the first digit and 18 out of 20 studies varied significantly from the expected value of the second digit. Only one paper did not vary significantly from expected values for the digits to the left of the decimal. For comparison, a meta-analysis using complex mathematical procedures was chosen as a control. The analysis showed a first-digit distribution consistent with the Benford distribution. Thus, the method used in the present study seems to be sensitive for detecting fraud. Additional statements of specificity cannot yet be made as this requires further analysis of data that is definitely not falsified. Future studies exploring conformity might help prevent falsified studies from being published.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22695776     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-012-2029-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  13 in total

1.  Dutch research community is shocked by cases of scientific misconduct.

Authors:  Tony Sheldon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-11-25

2.  On statistical methods to test if sampling in trials is genuinely random.

Authors:  J J Pandit
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 6.955

Review 3.  The analysis of 168 randomised controlled trials to test data integrity.

Authors:  J B Carlisle
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  Another kind of ethics: from corrections to retractions.

Authors:  S M Yentis
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 6.955

5.  Suspected research fraud: difficulties of getting at the truth.

Authors:  Caroline White
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-07-30

6.  Changes in Anesthesia & Analgesia for 2009.

Authors:  Steven L Shafer
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Notice of retraction.

Authors:  Steven L Shafer
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Misinformation in the medical literature: what role do error and fraud play?

Authors:  R Grant Steen
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 2.903

9.  Diagnostic tests. 1: Sensitivity and specificity.

Authors:  D G Altman; J M Bland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-06-11

10.  Statistical modeling of average and variability of time to extubation for meta-analysis comparing desflurane to sevoflurane.

Authors:  Franklin Dexter; Emine O Bayman; Richard H Epstein
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 5.108

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Application of Benford's law: a valuable tool for detecting scientific papers with fabricated data? : A case study using proven falsified articles against a comparison group.

Authors:  S Hüllemann; G Schüpfer; J Mauch
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  [Publication performances of university clinics for anesthesiology: Germany, Austria and Switzerland from 2001 to 2010].

Authors:  G Putzer; J Ausserer; V Wenzel; D Pehböck; T Widmann; K Lindner; P Hamm; P Paal
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Can authorship bias be detected in meta-analysis?

Authors:  Ahmed M Abou-Setta; Rasheda Rabbani; Lisa M Lix; Alexis F Turgeon; Brett L Houston; Dean A Fergusson; Ryan Zarychanski
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  Benford's Law and articles of scientific journals: comparison of JCR® and Scopus data.

Authors:  Alexandre Donizeti Alves; Horacio Hideki Yanasse; Nei Yoshihiro Soma
Journal:  Scientometrics       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.238

5.  Using the Benford's Law as a First Step to Assess the Quality of the Cancer Registry Data.

Authors:  Emanuele Crocetti; Giorgia Randi
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2016-10-13

6.  Pinocchio testing in the forensic analysis of waiting lists: using public waiting list data from Finland and Spain for testing Newcomb-Benford's Law.

Authors:  Jaime Pinilla; Beatriz G López-Valcárcel; Christian González-Martel; Salvador Peiro
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.