OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of 2005 and 2006 reductions in chemotherapy reimbursement, mandated in the Medicare Modernization Act, on patterns of chemotherapy receipt in the last 14 days of life. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Included in the study were Medicare beneficiaries dying with poor-prognosis cancer from 2003 to 2007. We compared pre- and postreform probability and frequency of chemotherapy receipt in the last 14 days of life, a validated quality measure, using linear models. We assessed changes in chemotherapy use in physician offices (where prescribing is often directly linked to physician income) and hospital outpatient departments (where the link is indirect and likely weaker). RESULTS: Among patients receiving chemotherapy in the 6 months before death in physicians' offices before the policy implementation (2003 to 2004), 18% received chemotherapy in the last 14 days of life. Those dying after implementation (2006 to 2007) were 3.5 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], -5.4 to -1.6; P <.001), or 20%, less likely to receive chemotherapy in the 14 days before death than those dying before implementation. By contrast, there was no significant change in the percentage of patients receiving chemotherapy in the last 14 days of life in hospital outpatient departments between 2003 and 2004 and between 2006 and 2007. CONCLUSIONS: In physician offices, where drugs generate the majority of revenue, and prescribing patterns can determine physician income, use of chemotherapy at the end of life fell significantly after reimbursement reductions; no concurrent change occurred in hospital outpatient departments. These results suggest that payment reform may be used to better align appropriate financial incentives with better quality of care.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of 2005 and 2006 reductions in chemotherapy reimbursement, mandated in the Medicare Modernization Act, on patterns of chemotherapy receipt in the last 14 days of life. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Included in the study were Medicare beneficiaries dying with poor-prognosis cancer from 2003 to 2007. We compared pre- and postreform probability and frequency of chemotherapy receipt in the last 14 days of life, a validated quality measure, using linear models. We assessed changes in chemotherapy use in physician offices (where prescribing is often directly linked to physician income) and hospital outpatient departments (where the link is indirect and likely weaker). RESULTS: Among patients receiving chemotherapy in the 6 months before death in physicians' offices before the policy implementation (2003 to 2004), 18% received chemotherapy in the last 14 days of life. Those dying after implementation (2006 to 2007) were 3.5 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], -5.4 to -1.6; P <.001), or 20%, less likely to receive chemotherapy in the 14 days before death than those dying before implementation. By contrast, there was no significant change in the percentage of patients receiving chemotherapy in the last 14 days of life in hospital outpatient departments between 2003 and 2004 and between 2006 and 2007. CONCLUSIONS: In physician offices, where drugs generate the majority of revenue, and prescribing patterns can determine physician income, use of chemotherapy at the end of life fell significantly after reimbursement reductions; no concurrent change occurred in hospital outpatient departments. These results suggest that payment reform may be used to better align appropriate financial incentives with better quality of care.
Authors: Mark McClellan; Aaron N McKethan; Julie L Lewis; Joachim Roski; Elliott S Fisher Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Mireille Jacobson; A James O'Malley; Craig C Earle; Juliana Pakes; Peter Gaccione; Joseph P Newhouse Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2006 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Craig C Earle; Bridget A Neville; Mary Beth Landrum; John Z Ayanian; Susan D Block; Jane C Weeks Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-01-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Joeëlle Y Friedman; Lesley H Curtis; Bradley G Hammill; Jatinder K Dhillon; Charles H Weaver; Sugata Biswas; Amy P Abernethy; Kevin A Schulman Journal: Cancer Date: 2007-11-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Craig C Earle; Mary Beth Landrum; Jeffrey M Souza; Bridget A Neville; Jane C Weeks; John Z Ayanian Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-08-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ezekiel J Emanuel; Yinong Young-Xu; Norman G Levinsky; Gail Gazelle; Olga Saynina; Arlene S Ash Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2003-04-15 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Alisa M Shea; Lesley H Curtis; Bradley G Hammill; Lisa D DiMartino; Amy P Abernethy; Kevin A Schulman Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-07-09 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Mark C Hornbrook; Jennifer Malin; Jane C Weeks; Solomon B Makgoeng; Nancy L Keating; Arnold L Potosky Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-09-29 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Volker R Jacobs; Gerhard Bogner; Christiane E Schausberger; Roland Reitsamer; Thorsten Fischer Journal: Breast Care (Basel) Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: William F Pirl; Joseph A Greer; Kelly Irwin; Inga T Lennes; Vicki A Jackson; Elyse R Park; Daisuke Fujisawa; Alexi A Wright; Jennifer S Temel Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2015-03-31 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Jonas B Green; Martin F Shapiro; Susan L Ettner; Jennifer Malin; Alfonso Ang; Mitchell D Wong Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 3.247